ARMY officials denied the brother of Michael Flynn, highly disgraced former national security adviser was at a meeting that discussed deploying the National Guard to the Capitol amid the 6 January riot. According to the Washington Post, officials on the telephone call were reluctant to deploy troops to the Capitol because their presence would have created a negative “visual” of a heavy military response. EXACTLY WHAT WAS NEEDED. https://www.yahoo.com/news/michael-flynn-brother-reveals-involved-155207621.html " entered the room after the call began and departed prior to the call ending as I believed a decision was imminent,", this critical moment of involvement was either good, bad, or benign. he also told trump supporters that they needed "to be fearless as Americans”, and that they had reached a "crucible moment" and "there has to be sacrifice". Those comments, and his brother’s role in the Army’s response to the riots are to come under further scrutiny amid criticism of relaxed policing on the day, and which the Pentagon has denied. The corrupted Pentagon needs to be opened up like a can of rotten sardines to find Bossie and Lewandowski at the helm. ...and where's Erik Prince?
When the Navy gets the gravy the Army gets the beans?? The article i read earlier today said the Flynn's brother was in the room during the call.
Flynn's a patsy because he sided with Trump. You don't get to be a protected person if you side with Trump.
traitor trump protected him as much as possible for being loyal and still is. a weird kinda weird lol
Yes it was certainly effective to have 25,000 soldiers to protect the capitol from a single protester. What is an NG brother?