Too bad so many will stay at home or vote third party...but even so, based on those that voted before I did, Obama loses. This should be a pretty good cross section.
Romney... I'd vote for almost any Republican over Obama except Sarah Palin (the one who quit her job as governor). The country is in need of recovery for God's sake.
I think it'll be a close race , but Obama will win . If Romney doesn't come out of the GOP Convention like a cannon ball , the Dems will have gained too much momentum to overcome by November. I'm looking forward to hearing Romney debate Obama on national Live TV , now that'll be entertainment.
How sad we need a party named after the constitution. Americans have become such weak and ignorant people.
If Romney doesn't win we'll have $10.00 a gal gas, the UN will rule the world, and all the illegal aliens will take the cheap jobs driving the rest of us Americans into the poor house, and our country will be bankrupt before 2016. Romney will drill for gas. Romney will make it harder for illegal aliens to live in the US. Romney will not bow down to the UN. Romney will end Obamacare. Staying home and letting Obama win and bankrupting our country isn't the answer.
Romney is Obama with slightly less socialist programs. Honestly WHO CARES at this point. If this is the best Americans can do then we'll call it a dictatorship and forget about elections. We have no choice. We have an illusion of choice.
Romney is the candidate the Republican Party had planning all along. It was not really the constituents that voted for Romney. It was the Republican Party leadership from the very beginning. Most of the Conservative media made it seem like Romney was the the most electable of the candidates. Then the media brought in some hand-picked candidates, that it knew could never become electable, just to keep up appearances, as if the people had a choice. The russians have a long history of using the same sort of tactics. Make it seem like the people are being given a choice. Here is a little hint: none of the Republican candidates were selected by the common voters. They were all endorsed by the Party. The entire "debate" was framed by the media. By selecting a bunch of other candidates that had ultra-conservative social beliefs, the Republican Party was able to make sure that Romney was the candidate the Liberal media would be least prone to attack. Half the conservatives would vote for Obama if that was what there media told them to do! The constituents have no idea how they are being played by their Party leadership. If you are a conservative and reading this, let me ask you this: How much information about politics do you actually get outside of the mainstream televised news? Fox news is owned by the same people who own the Wall Street Journal (newcorp), while the Economist magazine is controlled by Pearson PLC and members of the Rothschild family. The real ownership of Pearson PLC seems to be opaque, most of the corporate stock is held by shadowy stock funds. Also suspicious is that Pearson and newscorp seem to have many business dealings with eachother, transfering subsiduaries from one to the other. Newscorp even owned outright 20 percent of Pearson at one time.
Well, since the primary IS NOT over and Paul is grabbing delegates for the national convention, I would say I will wait to see how the RNC moves forward at the convention in Tampa before I make my choice. If they chose to ignore the Ron Paul vote or keep bringing fraud to the election, I will vote 3rd party.
Which only completely contradicts the assertion that Ron Paul can win, because not only has he NOT won, he's trying to sneak through the backdoor. There won't be a backdoor in the general election.
Drilling for oil in our own country is "less socialistic" Bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Closing borders to illegal aliens stealing jobs from Americans is "less socialistic" bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Changing the laws so companies like Apple can repatriate their money without being taxed to death is "less socialistic" bull(*)(*)(*)(*). They're pure Capitalistic. You need a new dictionary.
What you advocate is fascist bull(*)(*)(*)(*). If Apple wants to repatriate their corporate money tax free than they should move back production of their products to the U.S or pay a 30% import tax on goods... wtf? when is welfare to thse companies enough? As far as the borders being closed to illegal aliens.. get a whiff of reality, its the corporations that you so love that lobby to keep the federal government from enforcing immigration laws in the interior of the U.S. How the hell is allowing foriegn companies like Shell and multinational companies like BP and Exxon to drill for oil, destroying our environment in our best interest? All that oil goes on the world market and sold to to the highest bidder and larget consumer which is CHINA.. and you know what.. we pay them tax subsidies to do it!!! You dont need a dictionary.. you need oxygen
You don't know what your talking about and I'm getting tired of explaining it over and over again to those like you. Apple paid taxes on stuff it manufactered here and elsewhere that they sold here. Apple paid taxes to foreign countries to income they made in those foreign countries but are not allowed to take their profits and spend it in the US without paying an ADDITIONAL 30% tax on it. You do know what additional means right. Changing the laws so that we are just like Every other country where we don't tax income made in other countries would do the trick. Or a temporary tax holiday so they could repatriate their 90 billion in profits so they can then in turn spend it on manufacturing jobs here. http://www.appleinsider.com/article...oliday_gain_no_traction_with_white_house.html Second while you are right oil goes to the highest bidder, so does bread, and milk, and corn. The more you have of it the cheaper the price because of supply and demand. increase supply without increasing demand and you decrease the price. Simple economics. You need a realty check.
If the average American really understood what that would mean they would be against destroying the constitution. But again they're ignorant and weak beyond hope.
