Err...ummm....from what I have seen MGTOWs are not interested in dating. You are partially correct. Women want a man that has the ability to protect and provide for them and their children. The emotional crap you are talking about is nonsense.
Bah, reaction-formation. It is not and until you prove me wrong with an actual argument, I will remain correct.
Nothing said in the posts you responded to is even REMOTELY misogynistic. It is typical to completely lie about what others say and then claim that their statement demonstrates the need for something like feminism. Himmler would have loved that propaganda technique. " the fact that someone criticizes us proves the need for national socialism "
Saying "Modern feminism's objective is to absolve women of what little accountability they do have", "...most women are apolitical and care more about their hair dye than they do about 'oppression'" or "The problem is that women are herd animals and will therefore very easily fall for stupid trends." is pretty freakin' misogynistic. Care to deny it?
I might have been waiting for my medicine to kick in March 17th., when I wrote that. I'm a bear when I'm in pain.
I guess the question I have is what new law(s) is going to fix the issues feminist claim there are like the pay gap. Businesses nearly always make the choices they do because it's directly connected to there profits. I think it has more to do with the number of women that exit the work force to stay at home and lose out on having that time to gain more work experience. There are likely other factor's as well but it's really about professional standard's than anything. I mean look at how many businesses came down hard on the NC HB-2 restroom law. It's kind of hard for me to see how they could miss out on profits from that state and stand up for a much more fringe group and yet be anti women.
Men work longer hours than women on average, even when both are working full time. There are also major differences between jobs even in the same field. For example, pediatricians are not paid the same as neurosurgeons, nor is their job as demanding.
True. Buuut, if you want to show her that you like her, you will want to take her on dates and do stuff for her. If you like her these favours will come naturally. Furthermore, this is not only how - he says - it "traditionally" works, it is in fact how it biologically works - show a woman you have resources (economic, genetic, muscle, personality) and she will want you to have her eggs. How is this different from the Feminist narrative? MGTOW and Feminists should unite and fight together, they both have the same goals. Yes they are. Actually, this is how it usually works in Sweden; Swedes do not do dates in the American, "Lady and the Tramp" kind of way. Here a guy and girl will meet at the club, party or wherever, exchange numbers and then start texting. If that goes well, tney will meet for a coffee and if that goes well, they will meet again and eventually the guy might ask her out for dinner. Swedes are very reserved and shy and therefore feel it is threatening to be asked out "just like that".
I care to object since those quotes come from my posts. My first defense is that what is shared in the second quote is rooted in evolution and if evolution is misogynistic, you are right. But, no one can possibly be so dumb that they would claim empirical facts and nature, in themselves, are misogynistic. Or can they? The first quote is obviously not entirely serious and put in a semi-humorous way to make a point. You taking offense just proves women aren't funny.
No I will not deny it because it is an ignorant and foolish statement. It is not misognynistic and that is absolute fact. You do not get to redefine words to suit your argument. What was expressed was an opinion. It may be wrong you or I and others may not agree but to call it misogynistic is a cowardly evasion which shows you lack the capacity to criticize it or defend your position. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Misogyny Misogyny is hatred of or mistrust of women not opinions of women which you disagree with Btw you make the same mistake in many ways such as your ludicrous statement that there are fewer false rape accusations than their are rapists who get away with their crime which is a patented lie.
By all means, if you have proof that women evolved to be herd animals (and that men have not), then show it, otherwise, it is not an empirical fact and instead is misogyny. As for the first quote, humorous or not, you still inferred that women don't care about politics, which was proven wrong in January. Also, I'm not sure how me taking offense proves that women are not funny.
Women are 50% of the population in case you hadn't noticed. Furthermore your baseless generalization is utterly meaningless. If you want to make the case for receiving "preferential treatment" and then just "gliding along" you should have picked the wealthy 1% instead. Only that doesn't "kill off" their "feeling of self worth, & individuality" so that allegation of yours is false.
The lack of insight is just astounding! "Diversity" amongst men just amounts to which brand of beer is best and which football team is better because that is what you are saying about women in the screed above.
You know you're right. Affirmative Action many blacks have said, indeed was a great contributing factor in their personal feeling of low self worth. http://theblacksphere.net/2013/03/is-affirmative-action-destroying-black-pride/ Like many feminists agree that modern feminists are seen as a bane to the movement, by Old School fighters for the cause. http://news.nationalpost.com/news/n...cated-messy-personal-and-sometimes-alienating The 1%ers really have not thing one in common, or comparable to either.
Just quoting articles is meaningless. Where are the credible scientific studies to support your baseless allegations?
I said it and I meant it. Only that I am too young to be blamed. Like most of today's problems, the guilty are the godforsaken Baby-Boomers.