What about when this kid grows up. What happens when he decides for himself (if he is given the chance) that blokes screwing each other in the bum is sick? If gays want to get married let em. If they want kids, well bad luck, nature has spoken and you cant have kids.
Did i say i was? Its tragic when a couple cant have kids. For gays its just a fact. You do understand how reproduction works dont you?
No, that's why I asked you the question: to clarify (that's what questions are for). It's a fact for infertile couples too. Why do you have sympathy for one fact, and not the other? You said: Well, for infertile couples "nature has spoken" and they can't have kids. Fact. So, I'll ask my simple question again: Are you against infertile couples (man and woman) adopting children? (it's a question, not an assumption - you just need to provide the answer, because I don't know your opinion one way or the other).
'If infertile couples want to get married let em. If they want kids, well bad luck, nature has spoken and you cant have kids.' What do ya think Oxy? Same rules for everyone? Yes/No?
Its funny how people think that homosexuals shouldn't be allowed to have kids because 'nature has spoken' but they have different views on infertile couples.
Well when gays can come up with a natural way of preproducing and they are unlucky enough to have something go wrong and they can't reproduce then they can adopt alll the kids they want. Until then, nature has spoken and you can't reproduce by carpet munching or man on man anal sex. So IMO, no, same sex couples should not have the right to children.
Nature has also spoken to infertile (opposite sex) couples: they can't have children. So, why is it ok for infertile couples to adopt children yet it is not ok for gay couples to adopt? Or, are you against all adoption? What is it Oxy?
Infertile couples are using help to assist them in achiving what is natural, to repoduce and have a family. Gays can never reproduce. Gay copulation does not produce children. It is not natural. They should not be able to adopt. Nature has seen to it that you need a male and female to reproduce. One has a fan one has a willy. Is is my opinion. If you don't like it boo-hoo, i don't care.
With IVF, maybe. When they adopt, they are not naturally reproducing. Straight people born infertile can never reproduce. Straight copulation when one or both partners are infertile does not produce children. Albeit a rather ignorant, prejudiced opinion. I'm shattered.
say the word Tasmania without thinking of this? [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ed0Hg7stjHE"]YouTube- Bevilled Rabbit (1957).wmv - YouTube[/ame]
Nope. However you're looking increasingly stupid because you can't provide an answer. Give it a go Oxy, answer the question.
Infertile couples cannot have children the natural way. IVF is not natural - why is it okay for them to have IVF, which is unnatural, but not okay for gay couples to do the same?
Now you`re sounding desperste & stupid. The quality of discussion is scraping the bottom of the barrel when "adults" ask for an explanation of the difference between homosexuals and hetrosexuals who are accident victims, or victims of disease. Incidentally, I think "he" is a very disturbed woman or girl, not a male.
Let's get get back to the subject. Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. This means two people of the same sex cannot marry. To allow two people of the same sex to marry would be to tear down the existing meaning, purpose, history and culture of marriage and family. You would be giving legitimacy and acceptance to a sick parody of marriage and family.