Muslim migrants burn own housing over lack of CHOCOLATE

I think you're missing the bigger picture here: I was trying to get across that these migrants have been welcomed by their host countries, and at prodigious cost to the taxpayers of those countries infrastructures have been constructed to accommodate them in safety and comfort, plus the provision of free food and free health care: but instead of being grateful, they destroy what has been provided, and otherwise insult or abuse those who welcomed them. I obviously didn't need to be told that 'arson has always risked the loss of lives'.

 

Don't you find it embarrassing to be a supporter of their cause only for them to let you down by their unlawful and destructive actions? I would be.

 

Europeans are tired of aggressive tolerant idiots. They have only one hope for salvation.

 

That’s apparently true of two of them. It seems lots of other migrants went there only to be stuck in a disused warehouse with arsonists.

Some migrants will commit crimes, plenty won’t just as some natives will commit crimes while plenty won’t. The problem here is the criminality, not the migration (unless you think arson is OK as long as you do it in your country of birth).

 

It's no good, I simply cannot get on the same wavelength as a liberal. There's more chance I'd be able to get on the same wavelength as a doggy person and that's a chance in a zillion!

 

It’s nothing to do with being “liberal”, it’s basic logic. If an individual commits a crime, their guilt doesn’t automatically reflect onto anybody who happens to share any general characteristic with the criminal. If you can’t get on that “wavelength”, all hope is lost.

 

It isn't even that, it's the pedantry that does my head in; I was obviously only referring to those who show no appreciation or gratitude?

- - - Updated - - -

But out of curiosity, HJ - are you a doggy person?

 

Way to go with lumping all of them with the two arsonists and then you state "It's no good, I simply cannot get on the same wavelength as a liberal" !. I think that everyone, but you, will see that you are the one who is not getting it.

edit : just saw your next post addressing this

 

To what end though? I’ve never seen the point in commenting on any incidents with just “Isn’t this bad?” type posts and frankly I’ve never believed that is ever the sole motive.

In this case, I’ve no doubt that the underlying message, in the article being posted in the first place (remembering it was trawled up from months ago) and your responses (if only subconsciously), is that because of this incident migrants in general should be treated differently – allow fewer in, don’t provide them as much, don’t trust them as much etc. Why else would it be worthy of special comment, more than any of the countless other incidents of arson with no loss of life?

Nope. Cats all the way for me.

 

Not a dog owner then? I'd have lost money if I'd had a bet on it. Cats all the way for me too.

 

"Muslim migrants burn own housing over lack of CHOCOLATE" - that's nothing to surprised about, since keep in mind that Muslims believe (and won't condemn Mohammad for saying) that Mohammad "split the moon". They also believe that an invisible humanoid ("Jinn") could be living in your nose right now - but to be fair Christians are equally as gullible when they believe that Biblical "angels" (more invisible humanoids, but these have WINGS) are actually real.

Religious people have a devil of a time discerning reality from fantasy. Uh, speaking of the "devil"....

 

Yeah. 2 Religious people do that. So lets pretend 1.5 billion people do that every day. But if you go like that than all them male people in the US who voted on Trump are a bunch of genitalia grabbing sexists. Sounds good.

 

You seem to have the incredibly false belief that the 1.5 billion Muslims are moral people. Let me ask you this: can you condemn all Muslims (this figure will be well over 1.0 billion of them) that believe that Qur'an 5:33 is what's best for the world - it says to crucify (yes, crucify, I'm not making this up) people as punishment, and to cut off feet, and to cut off hands - no fooling. Can you, notme? If not, then you are giving tacit approval to barbarity.

 

You are so annoyingly pathetic. You are worse than any preacher - at least they post on the religious forum instead of spamming latest and current news forums! Are you following what your religion tells you to do ie spam all news sites with your anti-religion rhetoric?

 

Uh no. I can not follow you. I mean. Muslims aren't crucifying anybody at all, except those people from IS. And you now basically claiming all muslims are just like IS. Well we both know that isn't true. As for cut off feet and hands, well some people got that stuff just coming. I can't say the same of what goes on in the US, where unarmed black people get executed on the streets by mostly white police officers for minor offenses. I mean... if I have to put things in perspective -you know what perspective is?- than it aint that bad over there than in the US where racism is fully institutionalized in the justice department.

 

The problem is they let them in. There is no way to tell the good Muslims from the bad Muslims, so there is no reason to let ANY of them in.

 

So you deny that this happened. Right before you, and you deny that it's a threat. Incredible.

 

That's not a Muslim thing, it's a human thing. Your argument is one against letting literally anyone in to a country for any reason. It's also an argument against interacting with other human beings in any way.

 

Eeeeeeeeeeett, wrong. It is a Muslim thing, it's just politically incorrect to say so.

 

Let them eat cake, just not chocolate cake. They don't deserve it for torching what was graciously given to them. They can live under bridges and cook over barrels like our hobos did.

 

It's so obvious (well except to liberals!** ) that it shouldn't need to be explained?

** and pedants!!

 

Well the problem is his beliefs violate the law. Now should we change the law to cater to him, or does he need to conform. For that matter, should we just allow anyone who has differing beliefs differing laws.

 

Only in the eyes of CNN and co. There were 60 million voters, and so 400-ish acts of crime is supposed to alarm people. Yeah, cry me a river over it. You're not going to remember them, and not even the pitiful media is going to remember them: Why? Small numbers, that's why.

Political ideology against Liberalism is here to stay, and Libbies are just going to have to deal with that.

 

Seriously? Are you really this divorced from reality? Saudi Arabia's "justice" system: http://www.deathpenaltyworldwide.org/country-search-post.cfm?country=Saudi+Arabia
The US system:
http://www.deathpenaltyworldwide.org/country-search-post.cfm?country=United+States+of+America
I direct your attention to the death penalty provisions for adultery and apostasy. I dare you to find that in the US's justice system. Other Muslim majority countries are similar to Saudi Arabia. Support for the barbaric atrocity known as Shariah law is supported by a majority of Muslims, even among Muslims in Western countries. Support for terrorism ranges from 25-75% among Western Muslims. No one claims "all" Muslims are anything, but to deny the danger of Islam is to deny reality.

Blacks getting killed by cops in the US:
http://www.dailywire.com/news/7264/5-statistics-you-need-know-about-cops-killing-aaron-bandler
The relevant statistic here is #5: "Blacks are more likely to kill cops than be killed by cops. This is according to FBI data, which also found that 40 percent of cop killers are black. According to Mac Donald, the police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black than a cop killing an unarmed black person." What is "fully institutionalized" in the US is the feeling among the black community that cops are open season.

 

Why can't they go back and live in their 22 Arab countries ?