No, Operation Wide Receiver Does Not Excuse Obama Or Holder

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by Trinnity, Jun 21, 2012.

  1. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    (continued below)
     
  2. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    (continued)

    The continual and relentless effort by shills on TV news, in print and right here and on other political forums by paid bloggers and message board members, to deflect, deny, and distort the truth about operation wide receiver is the promotion of a bunch of lies to excuse the administration's corruption. Well, the real deal is in the article above, and though it's not a short article, it's worth the read.


    .
     
  3. DonGlock26

    DonGlock26 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    47,159
    Likes Received:
    1,179
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wide Receiver has nothing to do with the Holder/Obama cover-up.

    _
     
  4. jackdog

    jackdog Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    19,691
    Likes Received:
    384
    Trophy Points:
    83
    why does the Bush did it too defense remind me more of a "he hit me first" kindergarten spat, than a logical debate among adults. by all means investigate that one also, but they seem to me to be two different animals. As pointed out, wide receiver at least made a attempt to track the guns. Fast and Furious seemed more like a operation made to ensure as many weapons as possible were shipped across with no attempts of any kind to track them
     
  5. paco

    paco New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2009
    Messages:
    18,293
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So Wide Receiver was stopped when they lost some guns, while Fast & Furious was only stopped after the Obama Administration killed a border patrol agent. Also, AG Mukasey and President Bush didn't try to cover-up Wide Receiver or commit perjury like Holder and Obama did with Fast & Furious. Keep this in mind, lefties!

    .

    One more thing to keep in mind as we go to the voting booth in 4 months! :winner:
     
  6. Consmike

    Consmike New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2009
    Messages:
    45,042
    Likes Received:
    487
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wide receiver has NOTHING to do with this entire scandal.
     
  7. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But the dems would like to convince people that FF is Bush's fault and Obama/Holder stopped it. I saw one dem say just that - today.

    (not even) close, but no cigar. This scandal was an attempt "under the radar" to show reason for more gun control, but it backfired.

    Just watch how little liberals will participate in this thread, because it's so damming to their attempt to spin this scandal as something other than the high level corruption it is.
     
  8. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I knew it. The liberals won't touch this. Don't want anything like the truth messin' up the lies and spin. :spin:

    [video=youtube;CQFEY9RIRJA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQFEY9RIRJA[/video]
     
  9. fifthofnovember

    fifthofnovember Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2008
    Messages:
    8,826
    Likes Received:
    1,046
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Of course two wrongs don't make a right, and I would like to see some heads roll for BOTH operations. But the fact that it occurred under Bush, failed, then happened again, even bigger, under Obama just illustrates the larger problem: it doesn't matter which party is in office. "Special Agent In Charge Bill Newell” or some other (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) will be there making the same "mistake" over and over. Of course it's worse under Obama; his is the more recent presidency, and the corruption builds on itself as they use precedents from earlier administrations to "justify" even more corruption the next time. EVERY president in recent times has been worse than the last, and the trend shows no sign of changing (just wait and see, Romney supporters). But when you've got one on a hook, like we do now, you sure don't let him go.
     
  10. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Liberals won't touch this. Figures; it nails this admin to the wall for being responsible for this mess.
     
  11. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And still no liberals are able to step up and make any arguments against the OP ?
     
  12. Wolverine

    Wolverine New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2006
    Messages:
    16,105
    Likes Received:
    234
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What arguments are to be made exactly.....?
     
  13. Trinnity

    Trinnity Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2011
    Messages:
    10,645
    Likes Received:
    1,138
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Liberals are always saying Bush started it, and it's just like operation wide receiver. I am waiting for liberals to defend that position in light of the information I posted in the OP. No one has stepped up to do so. In fact, they're hiding from this thread by not answering the challenge.
     

Share This Page