Now Proven: trump is a Criminal Sexual Predator

Still can't tell the difference between action and boasting? Not surprised since it appears the neo-liberal no longer understands there is a first amendment.

 

Which part of Trump's actual words about ogling naked women don't you understand? Is it the part about them standing there with no clothes? Or perhaps the I sort of get away with things like that?

The Republican also discussed in an April 2005 interview how he barged in on nude Miss Universe beauty pageant contestants in their dressing rooms.

He characterized those visits as 'inspections' since he owned the contest.

'Well, what you could also say is that, as the owner of the pageant, it's your obligation to do that,' Trump said.

'Well, I'll tell you the funniest is that before a show, I'll go backstage and everyone's getting dressed, and everything else, and you know, no men are anywhere, and I'm allowed to go in because I'm the owner of the pageant and therefore I'm inspecting it.

'You know, I'm inspecting because I want to make sure that everything is good.'

He added: 'You know, the dresses. 'Is everyone okay?' You know, they're standing there with no clothes. 'Is everybody okay?' And you see these incredible looking women, and so, I sort of get away with things like that. But no, I've been very good.'

 

Move the goal posts much?

None of this corroborates any claims that he assaulted or groped women.

 

You must understand that for liberals, like their policies, they believe words are action. If they say something they think they have actually done something.

 

Please post the Trump quote where he said " could " You are confusing " could " and " can ". Could is hypithetical while can is not. Lets try an example. Try interpreting for me the statement " Soupnazi can read", or " Soupnazi can drive a car" Now try and explain how those mean that Soupnazi has never read or Soupnazi has never driven a car.

And then of course you realize that if he was actually being hypothetical he would have said " I could get away with it because I'm a star" instead of what he actually said which is " I can get away with it"

 

So far there are several allegations that trump DID DO some of the stuff that he bragged about being able to do because he is a star and because, as an owner, he was entitled to "inspect" the occupied beauty pageant dressing rooms. It also appears that a judge feels there is sufficient evidence to continue a criminal presecution of trump for rape of a 13 year old.

 

I'll go with her first version which was very detailed and told to more than one person. And it fits with his own characterization of himself as a serial sexual abuser. Also fits in with the allegations we're seeing and the case of the 13 year old girl he raped.

 

You have not one iota of proof.

 

Oh be a man and post them anyway. Remember you claim to have Hillary quotes showing how viciously she attacked Bill's rape victims. Of course you will not be able to do it which is why you kerp ducking which makes you either a fraud or a lier.

But of course should you be actually able to provide the quotes where Hillary viciously attacked the rape victims ( oh, and note your use of victems is plural) I will graciously appologize and if you can't post them I guess you will admit to making it all up. Seems a fair deal to me.

- - - Updated - - -

What was the question? Appears you are making a statement not asking a question.

 

Got any actual evidence? And I am curious just what you think made groping in a first class seat impossible back when the incident occurred. Are you talking about the phone number hoax?

http://www.snopes.com/jessica-leeds-phone-number-tied-to-clinton-foundation/

 

Why are liberals just now upset about sexual misconduct by someone who hasn't been proven innocent or guilty by anyone, but were not in the 90's?

 

Nope. Not until I verify the mods deleted your comment.

 

Well of course you will since it fits your bias along with the judge shopping girl that is trying for a third time to sue Trump.

- - - Updated - - -

So you believe Bill Clinton is a rapist right? After all ther are 'allegations'.

 

Oh there is plenty of proof.. did the things claimed in front of cameramen, script girls, producers and directors.. in fact the whole production crew..

Now there's another one from the Apprentice (2006).

He's a pig.. Your kind of guy?

- - - Updated - - -

Concerning the rape of the 13 year old.. They refiled because they have added three witnesses.

- - - Updated - - -

Concerning the rape of the 13 year old.. They refiled because they have added three witnesses.

 

The amazing magically appearing witnesses. This gal is going to lose. She had been to Epstein's at least four times and now she's going to claim that somebody raped her and she isn't accusing Epstein? Wonder if Bill Clinton was there.

 

I have not looked into to allegations against bill So i am open to the truth of the charges against him
But what seems true is that clinton did not brag about his entitlement to rape people

Trump has bragged about his entitlement to go into dressing rooms and to ambush kiss people
And several people have alledged that trump has done what he bragged about being able to do
I think it likely that more women will come forward... that is my hunch
I think that it is likely that these women talked with others at the time these things may have happened

Certainly bill clinton was--is a womanizer
Trump has bragged about being a womanizer on multiple occaisions
I believe him... although you might think he is a liar

Draw what ever conclusions you think are relevant from the above
I have separately posted about issues i think are more relevant.... tax policy

 

Because the democrats goose-stepped in unison and voted not to charge him, just like they're doing with his wife.

 

I was quoting you not him.

You are the one he said he could.

Reading or driving a car is a learned skill what you are referring to is not a learned skill.

Once again he admitted none of what you claim he was clearly speaking hypothetically

- - - Updated - - -

There is no such evidence to consider rape of a 13 year old.

What you are referring to is a law suit.

 

This is a reasonable summary of the allegations
http://www.snopes.com/2016/06/23/donald-trump-rape-lawsuit/

In this, a few things are indisputable
That mr Epstein arranged sex parties
Apparently these parties often fearured young and or under age women
That mr trump has been a long time aquaintance of mr epstein
And that mr trump has bragged about some fantasies he has about how his wealth and celebrity entitles him to have non consensual sexual contact with women

 

It is still a lawsuit not a criminal case.

Lawsuits are about money not truth

 

What exactly makes you think Liberals weren't upset anout Clinton's affair with Lewinsky? Because the Democrats didn't join in the Republican effort to impeach him for perjury.

Now answer me how Anyone can not be upset with the prospect of a sleeze like Trump in the White House. We now have four or more disgusting tapes, 11 women who say he was a sexual preditor, several teens who say he crashed a dressing room to ogle them. Tell me why anyone would elect a person like this as President unless of course they just want to make the US the laughingstock of the developed world.

 

Sorry but uou weren't quoting me you were claiming in your trump defense that he used " could " Nice try though. So far you have shown no evidence that would even lead one to assume he was talking in the hypothetical. Here is your sentence:

" Saying he COULD do what he wanted as opposed to having done whatever he wanted is more proof you are wrong and debunks your idiotic and willfully dishonest spin." Clearly from the context you think you are using Trump's words which only proves you either didn't listen to the tape or you didn't bother to read a transcript.

So feel free to try again to prove he was talking in the hypothetical. Otherwise most rational people will continue to believe his actual words. And of course there are now I believe about eleven women who have come forth with probably many more to come.

But I still want you to explain how you come to the conclusion Trump was talking hypothetically now that your claim he said could instead of can has been proven false. And this time try to use his actual words instead of your imaginary ones.

 

Proven by the best gossip and lies that money can buy.

 

You are not being rational and are lying it was you who claimed he did not say he could which in fact was his meaning.

He clearly did not say he had done those things he said it was possible.

Major difference and absolute fact his precise quote proves you are lying

 

So many women are rushing to defend the reality tv performer against the vicious claims that he is a Liar!

"I moved on her. Actually, she was down on Palm Beach. I moved on her and I failed. I'll admit it. I did try and f*** her. She was married."

"Nancy [O'Dell - former co-host of Access Hollywood], no this was... and I moved on her... I moved on her like a b****."

"I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I'm automatically attracted to beautiful... I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet. Just kiss. I don't even wait. And when you're a star they let you do it. You can do anything."

"Grab them by the p****. You can do anything!" ​

Those who scoffed that the candy arse creepy clown is nothing more than a low-energy, windbag wanker know better now!

He's really the genuine lowlife he portrayed himself to be!