Opposing Gay marriage and lifestyle?

Gays marrying has no effect on marriage. Your marriage isn't any less of a marriage because of it.

 

You're right... it's not gay marriage that's all about sex. It's gays period. After all, if sex was removed from the equation, gay men would be considered straight. Sex defines gays.

Studies show monogamy is very rare in the gay population. Maybe marriage will help... sure can't hurt

"There is an extremely low rate of sexual fidelity among homosexual men as compared to married heterosexuals.(*) Among married females 85% reported sexual fidelity. Among married men, 75.5% reported sexual fidelity. Among homosexual males in their current relationship, 4.5% reported sexual fidelity. (Sources:Laumann, The Social Organization of Sexuality, 216; McWhirter and Mattison, The Male Couple: How Relationships Develop (1984): 252-253; Wiederman, "Extramarital Sex," 170.(*) This is extracted from http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=IS04C02)"

http://carm.org/statistics-homosexual-promiscuity

 

Actually all 17 states with gay marriage prohibit marriage between two consenting adults who happen to be too closely related.

 

So what?

 

You, by insisting that of those excluded from marriage, only the homosexuals must be included.

 

Don't you get tired of getting called on this strawman?

 

Can you show us where anyone here has made that claim? Otherwise you are just building another strawman as usual.

 

And virtually every court case creating a right to gay marriage.

 

I'm sorry but that doesn't appear to be anyone saying, "ONLY homosexuals may get married".

So once again...well have fun with your delusions and strawmen.

 

You fabricate quotes (strawman) because you cant form a rational argument in response to what Ive actually stated.

 

"You" doesn't refer to you.

 

When did I say only homosexuals must be included?

 

So does that you you want to keep getting called on it?

 

................

 

Dixon, your quote of miguel proves that he did not say what you claimed he said...all you have to do is read to see that..

 

Sooooo then feel free to copy and paste where he said someone excluded other than homosexuals should be included. Your claims are meaningless. And the quote is accurate, you are full of it.

 

Now maybe you'd like to show where he said ONLY.

- - - Updated - - -

You accused him of saying ONLY. He didn't, and you made yourself look foolish again.

 

That is found in the absence of him advocating that anyone other than homosexuals being include. I cant duplicate every post of his to show that absence. Of course, you clowns could prove me wrong by quoting just one of his posts that do.

 

Can't find it? I accept your concession then.

 

Nope, you people are the ones who cant find even one post where he advocates including anyone excluded from marriage, OTHER THAN homosexuals. Thus my description of "only homosexuals". Im the one that cant take the time to reproduce every single post of his ever written to show that he has never advocated including anyone other than the homosexuals.

 

No, but you need it for everything else once you're committed to one person.

 

Interesting. It sounds like you're projecting everything we've said about you onto me.

 

It's ok. I already accepted your concession. You don't need to continue making yourself look foolish.

 

You are a compulsive liar. The quote

was a fabrication. I dont fabricate quotes and instead address what people actually state. You do everything you can to avoid it.

 

Oh lord, you've never heard of paraphrasing?

If I had actually QUOTED you, it would have had your name above it and been in a quote box, because unlike you I actually know how to properly use the quote function and I don't attribute text from articles to other people.

For example;

That is what I was paraphrasing by the way.