Oregon Supreme Court Blocks Gun Ban

Discussion in 'Gun Control' started by Wild Bill Kelsoe, Feb 12, 2023.

  1. Wild Bill Kelsoe

    Wild Bill Kelsoe Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2017
    Messages:
    22,433
    Likes Received:
    15,103
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Even the state supreme court recognizes the unconstitutionality of removing rights via a referendum.

     
    Turtledude likes this.
  2. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,594
    Likes Received:
    20,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    a slap on the face of the Karens
     
    Reality and Wild Bill Kelsoe like this.
  3. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Details here:
    https://www.opb.org/article/2023/02/09/oregon-gun-law-supreme-court-measure-114-block/

    The ORSC refused to reverse a stay while the issue works its way thru the courts:

    In a Dec. 6 temporary restraining order, Circuit Court Judge Robert Raschio blocked Measure 114′s provisions from taking effect.

    The Oregon Department of Justice immediately appealed to the state Supreme Court asking for Raschio’s order to be overturned. Hours before Measure 114 was supposed to take effect, the justices declined to consider the appeal.

    Days later, Raschio extended his order.

    “Plaintiffs show implementation of BM 114 would … cause an irreparable harm to gun owners and those seeking to purchase firearms for self-defense,” Raschio wrote in a Dec. 15 order granting a preliminary injunction. “Any deprivation of a constitutional right, even temporarily, constitutes an irreparable injury.


    ----

    Good news for the good guys.
     
  4. Turtledude

    Turtledude Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2015
    Messages:
    31,594
    Likes Received:
    20,911
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    In an ideal USA-politicians who pass anti gun laws that violate the constitution would be liable personally for civil damages pursuant to 42 USC Sec 1983. There should be no sovereign immunity or "qualified immunity" for such violations.
     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe likes this.

Share This Page