Pimps & Prostitutes

It keeps getting better. Maxine Waters wants the government to take over the petroleum industry. Waters trips over her tongue from time to time, but she can still sniff out a buck with the best of them. She knows that any phony justification for taking over the petroleum industry means more money in the pockets of high-ranking Socialists/Communists in government.

Watch her face in the video as she struggles to find an acceptable way to say she wants to steal private property:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=o3I-PVVowFY

Waters reminds me of an old joke. My family was in iron and steel. My father stole and my mother took in ironing. Waters wants to steal an entire industry in the name of her sick religion while she’s not adverse to a little larceny of a less celestial nature:

“Waters faces allegations of improperly working to secure federal aid for a minority-owned bank in which her husband was a large investor.”

Wives giving husbands a helping hand is one thing, but sending tax dollars to husbands goes far beyond nepotism:

nepotism (noun)

Favoritism shown or patronage granted to relatives, as in business.

Nepotism in business I can understand. There’s nothing wrong with a family business. Nepotism in government is another ball game because everyone is forced to support it.

Nepotism has been part of American political life for so long it’s not stretching it too far to say that titles like Senator have become hereditary titles. Senate seats being “saved” by caretakers until a member of the “right” family is ready to take office carries nepotism to new heights. Joe Biden’s senate seat was supposed to be saved by a caretaker until Beau Biden was ready to serve the people. Beau decided not run. Presumably, Beau did not want to give something back which is the standard reason they all give for “serving the people.”

The puzzle is why those who work hard for their money do not object to supporting lazy parasites? Rank and file parasites who vote for the practitioners of nepotism think they are getting something for nothing when all they do is advance the evils of hereditary rule. Keep an eye on Kim Jong Un in North Korea to see the latest example of hereditary rule in action.

Prior to the XVI Amendment nepotism was an unavoidable evil but controllable. In the last seven or eight decades nepotism has grown in leaps and bounds because of income tax dollars.

A few years ago it was reported that eighty or so Kennedys had government jobs. Guess how many millions of dollars in salaries and benefits it cost taxpayers to support the Kennedy clan every year? That’s nepotism everybody can see and understand even if they don’t agree with it. Think about it this way: Nobody gives a deserving relative a lousy job. Nepotism thrives because parasites get soft touch jobs; often no-show “employment.”

And, of course, there is nepotism once removed. Hillary Clinton’s initial run for the Senate would have been seen as the joke it was had her husband not been president. As it was, George Stephanopoulos called it a joke. It turns out she has been proving him right ever since.

Widows appointed to serve out a dead spouse’s term also comes under the heading of nepotism. There may be a little gender discrimination involved here because I never heard of a widower filling out a dead wife’s term.

I could be wrong about this whole female nepotism thing. It’s possible that smart procurers have been forcing their hustling girls to work in Congress. The distaff crooks in Congress could be the victims rather than the perps? Democrat ladies in Congress might be nothing more than working girls turning tricks for their pimps.

Streetwalkers and hustling ladies in both Houses screw the customers for money, but doing it in Congress is a hell of a lot more sanitary than doing it the old-fashioned way, and they do not have to be attractive to command the big bucks —— congressional prostitutes can be real bow-wows and the fee is the same. Serendipitously, who ever heard of a pimp pounding on a Congresswoman, or a lady Senator, because she had a slow night?

NOTE: Male hustlers like Harry Reid are in a different category. One can hardly say Reid’s family is pimping him out.

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2010/08/19/the-naked-harry-reid/

Finally, whatever happens at the federal level happens at the state level. I hate to admit it, but I may have to stop railing against the parasite class and start calling them the pimping class.

Accusations of committee impropriety follow Rep. Waters’s ethics investigation
By Felicia Sonmez, Published: July 18

A report offering new details regarding the House ethics committee’s handling of the investigation of Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) has led to calls for a new probe — this time, of the panel itself.

Politico reported Monday that two of the committee’s former attorneys may have compromised the Waters investigation by improperly communicating with Republican committee members.

This followed a Washington Post report last December that the investigation had been derailed by infighting within the committee, and that the Democratic committee chairman’s attempt to fire two investigators had been stymied by the top Republican on the panel.

On Monday, the watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington urged House Speaker John A. Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) to appoint an outside counsel to investigate the committee.

“At this point, far more important than an inquiry into the conduct of any specific member of Congress is an investigation into the committee itself,” CREW executive director Melanie Sloan wrote the House leaders. “A thorough review of the committee’s actions in the Waters case should be conducted by well-respected outside counsel. .?.?. It is imperative for House leadership to step in and take decisive action to reinvigorate and instill public and member confidence in the ethics process.”
+
The new details in the Politico report cast serious doubt on the future of the Waters case as well as on the ability of the secretive panel to carry out its mission of overseeing members’ ethical conduct.

Waters faces allegations of improperly working to secure federal aid for a minority-owned bank in which her husband was a large investor.

The ethics committee had scheduled her trial for last November, but before it could begin, it was abruptly postponed as the panel announced it had come across newly discovered evidence in the case.

The panel’s chairman at the time, Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), suspended the two lead lawyers in the investigation, former federal prosecutors Morgan Kim and Stacy Sovereign, over a dispute with the committee’s top attorney, Blake Chisam. Chisam later left the committee and has since joined a top immigration law firm.

Rep. Jo Bonner (R-Ala.), the current chairman of the committee, accused Lofgren earlier this year of trying to oust Sovereign and Kim “without cause.”

Politico reported that Chisam had written to Lofgren late last year with concerns that the two attorneys had improperly shared information on another ethics case, involving Rep. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) with several of the panel’s Republican members; Chisam also wrote to Lofgren that Kim and Sovereign had improperly withheld information from Waters’s defense team.

Meanwhile, Kim and Sovereign wrote to each other as well as to Republican members of the committee that Chisam had withheld evidence that could have been damaging to Rangel.

In a statement Monday evening, Waters’s attorney, Stan Brand, said that the Politico report and its accompanying documents “leave no doubt that the House Ethics Committee violated both its own rules and Representative Waters’ constitutional rights during its investigation of her matter last Congress.”

“Given that both current Members and staff are implicated” in these violations, Brand wrote, the case against Waters should be dismissed.

In March, CREW and several other watchdog groups called on the ethics panel to resume its investigation of Waters. But the panel had remained without a top lawyer until May, when it announced the hiring of Daniel A. Schwager, a former counsel to the Senate Select Committee on Ethics.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...nvestigation/2011/07/18/gIQAfyYiMI_story.html