Rich-Poor Gap Widens to Most Since 1967 as Income Falls

Discussion in 'Economics & Trade' started by Horhey, Sep 14, 2012.

  1. Horhey

    Horhey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    And people ask why Occupy Wall Street exists.

     
  2. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Solution? Its a difficult one for the petty left. Take Uncle Blair in Britain. His government did significantly reduce child poverty (down from ridiculously high levels compared to continental Europe), but also allowed income inequalities to further widen
     
  3. Horhey

    Horhey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2010
    Messages:
    5,724
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  4. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I asked for solutions, not vague reference to Iceland and their reaction to the financial crisis
     
  5. Liberalis

    Liberalis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2012
    Messages:
    2,432
    Likes Received:
    93
    Trophy Points:
    48
    When government subsidizes corporations, bails out banks, prints money, what else do you think is going to happen?
     
  6. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That makes little sense as those aspects of government interventionism are also used in economies with much lower (and sustained) income divides
     
  7. thediplomat2.0

    thediplomat2.0 Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2011
    Messages:
    9,305
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are many solutions to the income gap. The key elements which need to be addressed are the following:

    1. How can measures be made self-regulating, and thereby more cost-effective?
    2. Do measures fulfill a greater economic purpose than eliminating income inequality? In other words, is the measure efficient?

    Bearing in mind these two inquiries, here are some policies up for debate:

    1. A progressive negative income tax system with an added vocational or educational incentive on supplemental pay.
    2. Indexing the income tax system to account for non-linear variations in the cost of living.

    I am certain there are many more valid suggestions.
     
  8. Reiver

    Reiver Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    39,883
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've always been a firm supporter of the integration of tax and benefit systems. However, we have to be careful with the efficiency angle. Welfare should be judged on efficiency and effectiveness criteria. Many countries have partial examples of negative income tax systems, but the focus tends to be too much on efficiency
     

Share This Page