Most posting that babies are being killed are old geezers who will never change their mind. Post solid reasoning and let the future generations decide for themselves
We are witness to the desperate death throws of the anti-choice movement and the underlying religious reasoning behind it. Christianity is fading in this country (actually all religions) and those who grew up in it and rely on it do not want it to die, so they are lashing out in desperation.....it wont be pretty.
Forum right wingers constantly condemn Islam and non-righties on the (alleged) grounds that they there are intolerant. Yet, as shown in this forum on a daily basis, nobody is more intolerant than is the right wing.
A similar situation is taking place for them, and Mr. Trump is expediating it for them though they cannot see it.
This is true very often on this forum. I constantly post demands for proof from these right wingers who constantly make up their own "facts" but fail to provide any evidence for their allegations.
What you are noting is the intended result of this "Fake News" campaign instigated by our President....fact has become fiction and vice versa. The scary part being that those effected see it being pointed out as fake as well...self perpetuating propaganda, its actually borderline genius.
He can't and has run away from the thread. When RWers are asked for facts, they never return to the threads they BS about.
It's not that difficult to confuse binary thinking. But when they become confused and are asked to provide evidence, they run off. Which is good, for they are then stopped spreading lies, for the moment.
This site leans quite heavily to the RW side of the spectrum. And the poll in this thread, by more than 2 to 1, says NO, don't overturn R v W. Quite telling on how the real world also thinks.
I think there is a lot of truth in your post. It has only been recently--since 1975--that humanity has had actual evidence with details available to them regarding the afterlife & the alternate dimensions we call the spiritual or Astral. Before 1975, we depended upon religious teachings to supply that info for us, but the Near Death Experiences & past life regressions available to us since 1975, have allowed us to see much more regarding the afterlife & the ongoing relationship between the physical & spiritual worlds & how they work together. That new knowledge has had & continues having a huge impact on our personal relationship with religious teachings, & religions are shrinking as a result. That's good. Direct knowledge is always better than dogmas.
right wingers always run away such as in the thread where they pretended that Muslims screamed "F Jesus" and in others where they make up other fairy tales
FoxHastings said: ↑ . It didn't have to...once BORN it is a legal person. Anti-Choicers do not recognize that women have a right to life. At BIRTH. The UVVA(Unborn Victims of Violence Act ) does NOT say that a fetus is a legal person. No, that is blatantly false. "Most everyone" do not agree. Late term abortions may be performed legally if the life/health of women or fetus is in jeopardy... WHAT is "true"? Any rights the fetus may have (none) end when they infringe on the woman's rights. Well, it is clear you can't address my post but just want to toss out weak attempts at insults....nothing new for Anti-Choicers there Get back to me when you want to discuss the topic which isn't me...until then I am happy to point out you could NOT refute one word of my post
Fetal rights laws are coming. People like you are dinosaurs who would bestow more rights on a lowly animal than an unborn human being. Anyone who denies the rights of life and safety to an unborn human being is a supporter of murder and uncivilized by any standard. Fetal rights are the only moral choice for a civilized society. Women do not have the right to murder their own children beyond a reasonable period of time.
FoxHastings said: ↑ . It didn't have to...once BORN it is a legal person. Anti-Choicers do not recognize that women have a right to life. At BIRTH. The UVVA(Unborn Victims of Violence Act ) does NOT say that a fetus is a legal person. No, that is blatantly false. "Most everyone" do not agree. Late term abortions may be performed legally if the life/health of women or fetus is in jeopardy... WHAT is "true"? Any rights the fetus may have (none) end when they infringe on the woman's rights. Well, it is clear you can't address my post but just want to toss out weak attempts at insults....nothing new for Anti-Choicers there Get back to me when you want to discuss the topic which isn't me...until then I am happy to point out you could NOT refute one word of my post . When? Then there are people who bestow more rights on a lowly animal than women......and laugh about it... Anyone who denies rights to born persons making them no more than slaves( supporting slavery, a vile act) is a supporter of slavery. That last sentence !! HILARIOUS! So there IS a reasonable period of time when women can murder their children !!! WHAT!!!!
FoxHastings said: ↑ . It didn't have to...once BORN it is a legal person. Anti-Choicers do not recognize that women have a right to life. At BIRTH. The UVVA(Unborn Victims of Violence Act ) does NOT say that a fetus is a legal person. No, that is blatantly false. "Most everyone" do not agree. Late term abortions may be performed legally if the life/health of women or fetus is in jeopardy... WHAT is "true"? Any rights the fetus may have (none) end when they infringe on the woman's rights. Well, it is clear you can't address my post but just want to toss out weak attempts at insults....nothing new for Anti-Choicers there Get back to me when you want to discuss the topic which isn't me...until then I am happy to point out you could NOT refute one word of my post . When? Then there are people who bestow more rights on a lowly animal than women......and laugh about it... Anyone who denies rights to born persons making them no more than slaves( supporting slavery, a vile act) is a supporter of slavery. That last sentence !! HILARIOUS! So there IS a reasonable period of time when women can murder their children !!! WHAT!!!! OK, you could NOT address my post so I suppose you won't answer the question When is "reasonable period of time when women can murder their children "" I have never seen a law of any kind saying it's OK for women to murder their children... So if a pregnant woman faces a life threatening gestation after 22 weeks then you would rather she die than abort?
FoxHastings said: ↑ . It didn't have to...once BORN it is a legal person. Anti-Choicers do not recognize that women have a right to life. At BIRTH. The UVVA(Unborn Victims of Violence Act ) does NOT say that a fetus is a legal person. No, that is blatantly false. "Most everyone" do not agree. Late term abortions may be performed legally if the life/health of women or fetus is in jeopardy... WHAT is "true"? Any rights the fetus may have (none) end when they infringe on the woman's rights. Well, it is clear you can't address my post but just want to toss out weak attempts at insults....nothing new for Anti-Choicers there Get back to me when you want to discuss the topic which isn't me...until then I am happy to point out you could NOT refute one word of my post . When? Then there are people who bestow more rights on a lowly animal than women......and laugh about it... Anyone who denies rights to born persons making them no more than slaves( supporting slavery, a vile act) is a supporter of slavery. That last sentence !! HILARIOUS! So there IS a reasonable period of time when women can murder their children !!! WHAT!!!! OK, you could NOT address my post so I suppose you won't answer the question When is "reasonable period of time when women can murder their children "" I have never seen a law of any kind saying it's OK for women to murder their children... So if a pregnant woman faces a life threatening gestation after 22 weeks then you would rather she die than abort? Address my post and I'll address yours.
FoxHastings said: ↑ . It didn't have to...once BORN it is a legal person. Anti-Choicers do not recognize that women have a right to life. At BIRTH. The UVVA(Unborn Victims of Violence Act ) does NOT say that a fetus is a legal person. No, that is blatantly false. "Most everyone" do not agree. Late term abortions may be performed legally if the life/health of women or fetus is in jeopardy... WHAT is "true"? Any rights the fetus may have (none) end when they infringe on the woman's rights. Well, it is clear you can't address my post but just want to toss out weak attempts at insults....nothing new for Anti-Choicers there Get back to me when you want to discuss the topic which isn't me...until then I am happy to point out you could NOT refute one word of my post . When? Then there are people who bestow more rights on a lowly animal than women......and laugh about it... Anyone who denies rights to born persons making them no more than slaves( supporting slavery, a vile act) is a supporter of slavery. That last sentence !! HILARIOUS! So there IS a reasonable period of time when women can murder their children !!! WHAT!!!! OK, you could NOT address my post so I suppose you won't answer the question When is "reasonable period of time when women can murder their children "" I have never seen a law of any kind saying it's OK for women to murder their children... So if a pregnant woman faces a life threatening gestation after 22 weeks then you would rather she die than abort? Address my post and I'll address yours. Uh, the one who had no answers was YOU......all you had was one liners....NO answers....are you morally corrupt?? I do like how you keep quoting me so everyone can see you have no refutation of anything I posted
Her life is as valuable as any child. That's why women have gone to prison for killing children. But not for abortion. As the mother is the one who determines rights. Are you suggesting women go to prison for an abortion?
