...and then the Anti-Choicers swear they really aren't trying to punish women for having sex.....LOLOLOLOL!!!!!! NO, it isn't, they are forcing women to remain pregnant. So he should be left on the mountain to die? Wow, you righties are all heart and compassion...
Your grasp of the Subject Matter in this instance appears to be seriously wanting. ALL rights CAN be REGULATED and Justice Scalia stipulated point in his Heller ruling regarding the 2nd Amendment. Gun laws ARE Constitutional. Strike one! Want to try again?
We can back and forth over this all day Unless there is a 100% chance of pregnancy with sex consent to sex does not also imply consent to pregnancy
15 year old can vote - admittedly not in state nd federal elections but they re capable of voting Is a foetus capable of voting?
RvW already imposes REGULATIONS on abortion. Those REGULATIONS prevent the states from banning abortion entirely since that is a protected right. The right to an abortion in the first trimester is absolute. But thanks for clarifying that you have NEVER bothered to actually READ the RvW decision for yourself.
that is what pro-choice is about, keeping government out of it... your free to choose not to have an abortion, no one wants to take that right away and that is one of the choices in pro-choice in fact I do not think Government should be pushing that there is or is not a God, woudl you agree? it should not be on our money or in our pledge
My position isn't a legal one abortion is murder. My argument is a moral one. In this instance i believe, because of the severity of the crime, law should follow morality. This is a genocide.
Thank you for proving my point that you have never read the RvW decision for yourself. You have every right to your OPINION but you have NO right whatsoever to IMPOSE your morality on anyone else. Your rights END where the rights of others begin. That is how the Law of the Land works and NO ONE is above the law.
No, consent to sex is NOT consent to any other act. Besides , if a woman has sex she could consent to getting pregnant but that doesn't get her pregnant. A woman could have sex a thousand times all the while "consenting to get pregnant" and NOT get pregnant. They are two distinct acts. Even if she "consented" to get pregnant, consent can be withdrawn at any time ..
It makes perfect sense if I apply the deluded rationale of sanctuary state liberals. There's no false equivalency, it's just another in a long line of examples of liberal duplicity, and authoritarianism.