I would appreciate you ending the partisan rants and stick to a form one would use in any college level class room. Thank you so much. My points were twin points. 1. Monument. Again, Roy Moore did not establish any religion. As i said, the monument was of the historical Jew tablets known as the 10 commandments. Those are located in many public libraries and also found on government buildings in Washington DC. The 10 commandments is not the Congress establishing a religion. Moore had a perfectly legally valid argument. Courts do make errors. The founders whom created the constitution conducted church services in various government buildings and did so with no problems. 2. As I stipulated, he quit the job his final time as Chief Justice. Justices do not enforce law, but issue orders to those who do enforce law. Your language is terrible. Can you take care of this please?
When I have read up on the Nazi regime, I have long noticed the same lack of compassion for the vulnerable and callous disregard for the human life. Your choice of words gives tips about character.
Clinton is the poster boy for Democrats and they are still around. I'm not too sure about Moore on a personal level but we are in political war right now and he's in a very important spot. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend"
Actually it's just the opposite. Trump is a figurehead of those of us pushing a certain agenda and most of us Trump supporters like his policies but cringe a bit at his personality.
You don't care about the personal life of the soldier next to you when the enemy is inside the wire, you just want him to do his job.
Without dealing with the ugly posts here, I will issue a clean post. Judge Roy Moore is a US Citizen. Isn't he? Come on. The man has rights. The man is not charged in a court of law. The man is a former Justice of the Supreme Court of Alabama. We must respect the voters rights. They will either elect the man or refuse to elect him. I am sure bigots made up their minds based only on some ancient claims. They do not rise to the level of charges. Charges cite law and explain what was wrong. So, let's go over the age of the young woman or as I see her, a teen girl. How about her rights? She was then lawfully eligible to marry. This means she had women's rights. She had the right to have sex. Ask any Democrats and they encourage young girls to engage in sexual intercourse. I have argued so long with Democrats that I know verbatim their views. I have chided them over encouraging youth to have sex. They tell me the kids will have it anyway. That the best thing is to educate them so they have safe sex. Moore is not charged in the public over sex. He is claimed to have participated with a then legal age girl, rightfully per Alabama law, called a Woman, (I am not able to come to grips with this since to me a 14 year old still needs maturing) in her and his acts of kissing and partially disrobing her. She is alleged to ask to stop. He is alleged to then stop. I very much question any person in his trimester of adult life getting involved with people that young. I believe he may have sought virgins. I think there is no need to seek virgins. I married two women who bore me daughters. Both had children. Clearly they were not virgins. So my opinion is he at his age of over 30 belonged with more mature women. Does the law provide relief tor those now attacking Moore? Gloria Alred would have his butt in court by now if she had standing to do it. She has never been shy about suing. I think she hopes he will cave in and confess. A former Judge is too sharp to confess. She won't win. I will go with the voters of Alabama. They will select what sort of man they want as a Senator. Should Franken have quit? It was up to him. What about Franks? Same thing. And he quit. Each person has to make up their own mind. it is not up to me to make it up for them. my 2 cents are on the table. Again, i do not approve sex with children. So do not claim I support this at all. My notion is to look first to law and then we can enter the moral stage.
You want Moore out? For starters, let's settle whose lying about the year book. Moore's side wants the yearbook to age test the inks. That will prove one way or another whose lying.But the accusers refuse to submit to any testing. Why?
If I had any say so to Trump, it would be stick to very professional forms of communication. Do not fall into the trap of tweets that often are misconstrued. The press wants those land mines. They thrive on those headlines. He hands ammo to the enemy. As to his job, he has tons of resistance. And when presidents have this sort of resistance, they learn fast they do not rule, they only manage agencies. And they take care of foreign policy.
Trump definitely has foot in mouth disease and should learn to think before he speaks but he is who he is and I don't see that changing. His policies though are well thought out and I agree with most if not all of them and that's the main thing to me. Realtors say location location location. In politics it's policy policy policy.
and men that rape women needs to be in prison also correct? so why aren't you calling for B. Clinton to be in prison? instead a year ago trying to put him back in the white house
Sure, I more than admit that, I think for Trump he thinks it is his power. Funny you used my business slogan on real estate. Location is the single most vital thing on real estate values. My father bought a piece of property that in my view was not all that well located. But he and Mom loved it. When they died, I sold it. Get this, it was 20 acres on the side of a hill with redwood trees and other types of trees. He cleared part of it and put a permanent mobile home there and they loved it till the day they passed away. For them, the location was perfect. I like a river front if possible. But he evaded floods on the Eel river so his location never got flooded.
Clinton is different. He is a Democrat. We must understand the thinking of Democrats. When it is one of them, it is different.
AWESOME! Now we are allowing Pedophiles into Congress even before we elect them in the name of Politics. Funny how Republicans MORALITY goes right out the window, just as long as a candidate recognizes themselves as a Republican.
It’s also pretty pathetic that you see your fellow American citizens as “the enemy” just because there is disagreement on policy issues.
Yeah but those were the democrats of the white working class. That all changed with obama, you don't have the white working class anymore, so I wouldn't count on that old trusty cycle of white people going back and forth between Dem/rep
Well, I agree with you on something. Partisans often do not take into account how fickle politics can be.