I have no idea how to answer such a silly question But if that is your lifeline to the EU I’ll take a stab at it My guess is that modern cargo ships are pretty fuel efficient thanks to their hull design and probably use less fuel than a trans Atlantic airliner But again, if you choose to starve because you fear drowning due to rising sea levels be my guest Maybe the experience of these two climate wackos will lift your spirits https://www.sbs.com.au/language/eng...and-from-australia-to-reduce-carbon-footprint
In a war you have to defeat the enemy where you find them and defend your assests China is targeting US farmers and trump is responding
For our friend philo who is freaked out over global warning that may be a case of one step forward and two steps back: https://www.drovers.com/article/facts-about-hormones-and-beef Most of the beef produced in the US spend most of their lives in a pasture and are then finished in a feedlot where they are given a grain fed diet. Beef that are finished in a feedlot with the aid of growth hormones require less total land mass, less feed crops and create fewer greenhouse gasses per pound of beef produced compared to non growth hormone pasture based finishing systems. Bummer
Indeed they did. But recognise it as bad, but Americans celebrate it as good. My ignorance is as nothing compared to yours, you don't even use the word 'free' correctly.
I am a vegetarian, and personally don't choose to eat dead creatures. My comment about food imports was about distance travelled. By the way what pollution does the leather industry create?
I respect the EU right to prohibit hormones if they want to But after Brexit GB is not bound by that dictate
Leather usually comes as a byproduct from beef production. So, leather industry pollution bears the share of beef production pollution.
As with all EU regulations the UK chose to accept the ban on growth hormones and bleached chickens. In their haste to set up trade deals with the US these regulations will have to be abandonned. Taking back control and handing it straight to the US.
There will be no brexit without a controlled border on the island of Ireland. The vote was 'leave' not 'remain joined'. (P.S I believe the correct word is 'dictat' not 'dictate'.)
If you say so Its your language As for the US selling food to the UK its only one option you have And in your case at least does not appear to be a very good one But I think its just a red herring Why wouldnt the greedy euros want to keep selling food to their former subjects?
This is news to me so I looked it up https://www.thegrocer.co.uk/buying-...at-their-poultry-with-chlorine/555618.article According to a report from the Adam Smith Institute (which argues in favour of allowing PRTs), “immersing poultry meat in chlorine dioxide solution of the strength used in the United States reduces prevalence of salmonella from 14% in controls to 2%. EU chicken samples typically have 15-20% salmonella.” I’m no expert but thst dont sound good
Mr BoJo's auguries regarding the UK absconding with a modicum of decorum must be regarded in light of his prievious divinations: "HELP! HELP! I'M DROWNING!"
American's are so ignorant on what is all around them for them to see two examples https://www.theguardian.com/environ...ng-seas-florida-climate-change-elizabeth-rush https://www.businessinsider.com/miami-floods-sea-level-rise-solutions-2018-4?r=US&IR=T It is going to cost them much more to sort out the longer they leave things and many of them are going to end up refugees - be interesting what they think of Refugees when they are back to the position they began.
This might help you: https://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/responsible-living/stories/are-vegan-shoes-eco-friendly It cites the indisputable case that vegan or vegetarian shoes are not all eco friendly whilst also comparing them to leather products. A (maybe the) significant difference is that animals are not killed for their skins in the production of vegetarian or vegan shoes, and for vegans and vegetarians it is a significant factor. I want to remind you that it was you who introduced leather into this discussion.