Scant Evidence That Clinton Had Malicious Intent

That's how I felt about trump, I guess we'll see who has better political instincts. Bookmarked for gloating and/or crow eating lol

 

So you're admitting that government accounts aren't safe either?

What do you mean by "secret" emails? My sense is that you have not been following the arguments and debates I've had with others about these exact topics.

There are good reasons why she will not be charged with anything. I've placed good arguments with source material and links all over this web site as to why she will not be charged. .. You are no longer contesting that there is any real evidence to prove that Lazar hacked into Hillary's private email system. Everything you are now pointing out since you changed the subject is old crap. If you wish to look through previous posts of mine feel free but I don't have to re-post and rehash my same arguments a dozen times every time you dredge up old chewed over crap because you can't stay with subject at hand.

 

No, Kerry did.

My mistake, that should have said top secret.

And this is how Clinton and Obama work, stall and never give an honest answer about anything and when questioned again about it they say it's old news. Benghazi is a perfect example of that.

But check this out from the Huffington Post, hardly a conservative beacon - it's spooky how they use the same examples I used earlier, but this is the first link that pops up when googling guccifer. The first.

Romanian Hacker ‘Guccifer’ Just Gave Bernie Sanders the Democratic Nomination

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/h-a-goodman/romanian-hacker-guccifer-_b_9856196.html

 

Hillary dindoo nuffin !!!

View attachment 42939

 

Haven't you been getting good info on this matter, you point is entirely specious. There is no intent need to be shown malicious or otherwise. Gross negligence is the measure. And it has already been proven with public fact yes she intended to violate archiving regulations and rules and violated a presidential directive to NOT use personal email addresses let alone a shadow server.

 

Lol . Now after you stopped contesting the fact that there is not a shred of evidence that Lazar hacked Clinton's email account somehow you think that piling on old refuted crap makes your case.

 

Don't you get tired of repeating the same old well refuted crap.

 

What I'm afraid of is that you actually do talk that way.

 

Intent isn't required.

Go to jail.

 

At least Bernie's wife said 4/30/2016 on FOX Business that she wants the FBI to speed things up.

Holding off on Bernie's honesty till I see how the Bank fraud probe of his wife turns out. Catholic diocese lost $1.5 million on a real estate deal she was involved in.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3422464/posts

 

Just to clear up, I didn't mean you when I said "you lefties"

 

Guccifer provided no evidence that he hacked the server to NBC "news"? Umm.... He was interviewed by NBC "news" in a Romanian jail. By a democrat jack posing as a journalist typing for the democrat party under the cover of NBC "news" which then sat on the story for weeks.

I'm not sure whose credibility is lower, Hillary's or the democrats posing as journalists.

 

But not his own laws!

 

Wow, now losing money on a real estate deal is considered proof of fraud. Guess we will gave to charge every American and their realtor whose home is now worth less than when it was purchased.

And then there is the Trump casinos.

 

Got anything to say about the thread topic? Got any rebuttal to anything I said that is based in fact or logic?

She LIED about having this server installed in a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF). She lied about not sending, receiving, and re-transmitting classified information. She's lied about nearly everything, and then tries to hide behind a facade of feigned ignorance, musing that wiping a server is something that is done with a cloth....

Your own ignorance can be overlooked however, because, after all, you on the Left have to be Hillary supporters. It's her "turn" to be president, she has a vagina, and she will carry on your "Holy Grail" of government -- Socialism, complete with handout welfare, "subsidies", and all the other trappings of a diseased, suicidal nation. You can also be forgiven because it is almost 99.9% certain that you have never held a government security clearance. I have. Two top-secret clearances. Call me a liar if you wish, but that is the truth.

What I'd like to see now is one (ONE) post from someone else who has also held a top-secret security clearance that is willing to say that Hilarity Clinton broke no laws, and committed no infractions against classified information protocols or national security. Just ONE....

 

Patreaus had no malicious intent either.

 

I believe Cankles had no malicious intent. She didn't want to expose top secret information to the world.

But this incident shows she's clueless, incompetent, and has terrible judgment.

 

Definitely not presidential material...

 

Neither Condaleeza Rice nor Colin Powell are behind bars. Both used private email accounts and had emails retroactively labelled classified.

 

But neither of them had private email accounts to pass classified information on servers that were "in the wild". Huge difference.

BTW, to those who think she didn't handle classified information in her email... how do you explain this? Link: https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...e2ee06-dbd6-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html Sorry, people, you can't have it both ways....

 

No I keep repeating the facts not your old well refuted crap. The law does not require malicious intent or any intent at all. It's called GROSS NEGLIGENCE. If you believe so then cite the law which says so.

An NSA worker takes a break on some material he is working on and taking the folder with him goes around the corner for a Starbucks. He accidentally leaves the folder on the table and goes back to work. As he enters his office his phone is ringing and his buddy at the Starbucks is frantic telling him he left his folder on the table. The guy runs back and gets it and brings it back to his office. No one looked at it, no one even touched it. None of the documents are marked classified. The information in them is classified, TOP SECRET, classified at birth as he was trained to recognize and in the position which he holds classified information is a routine matter for him.

He has committed a crime and if the NSA security people find out he will be prosecuted.

There more clear for you now?

 

Because they did not use a private server in a non-secure location without proper security protocols for ALL their official emails, Rice did not even have an email account private or government. Powell used a SCI server in an SCIF for all his classified information and only two were sent to the other address for foreign diplomats and of course the rules were different at the time.

BUT if either of them DID use a private unsecured server and acted with gross negligence in the handling of their official classified information then at the least they should have any security clearances revoked, never given them again and should never be in a government position where classified information must be dealt with on the routine basis.

Don't you think?

 

Yep same old regurgitated ignorant crap,

''gross negligence” as a legal matter, doesn’t, and shouldn’t, just mean it was wrong or dumb or even just careless. Rather gross negligence is generally defined legally as: “A lack of care that demonstrates reckless disregard for the safety or lives of others, which is so great it appears to be a conscious violation of other people’s rights to safety. It is more than simple inadvertence"

No it's stupid. You're obviously hiding something because there's no link for this. And the word If from what I can tell is strictly opinion since he hasn't been charged with anything. This is purely hypothetical and means nothing More B.S.

http://lawnewz.com/high-profile/no-...a-crime-at-least-based-on-what-we-know-today/

 

He had intent to distribute classified information to someone who was not authorized to view it. But, I know you guys aren't the most honest people out there.

 

Whoa there!

Paula Broadwell had security clearance, did the IT company Hillary turned her server over to?