someone should create an anti gun policing force that gets rented by cities/states

Oh, sure; let's let projectiles ricochet down the street where they can hit innocent bystanders. Great plan!

Liberal sheeple crap like this pops up from time to time, and it gets cops killed every time, and it ultimately disappears; but always after the damage has already been done.

Easy. Because I'm not a brain-addled moron who actually thinks destroying people's most basic civil liberties will do diddly-squat to stop school shootings. Besides, I swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic... and a man's word should mean something.

 

One of those faces on the mural I posted was a friend I grew up with, killed at 14 from a ricochet off a building and hit to the head. You have no clue what rubber bullets are, nor their potential to kill; but then, like many liberals, you don’t care about the lives it costs to achieve your anti-gun agenda. You might as well wish for a magic wand, such is the nature of your fantasies.

 

Laws cannot and do not prevent physical actions from occurring. The criminalization of murder has done nothing to prevent any individual from picking up a random blunt object, and proceeding to bludgeon another individual to death. The complete and total prohibition of explosive devices and fully-automatic firearms in the nation of France did absolutely nothing to prevent their terrorist attacks from occurring.

 

Then do go and hold this supposed vote. See what comes about from such efforts. Cease prattling on about what would be done, and actually go and do it.

 

They already did. Its called the Democratic Party!

 

That's endangering bystanders. Police are taught to shoot center of mass to try to prevent bystanders from being hit.

 

Pretty much only in the us. In Europe warning shots are a thing.
Its ****ing nuts man.

And they say we're the ones that are crazy.

 

You demonstrate in every thread your participate in a continual deep ignorance of both the US Constitution, law, and arms technology very much like liberal pundits in the mainstream media that push the Left’s social mob dogma and fantasies. As I previously posted, you have no clue of the consequences of the weapon or policies you advocate. Because something is labeled ‘Rubber’ supposedly to emphasize a non lethal solution, doesn’t mean it’s non lethal in practice. It is just an excuse and rationalization.
https://www.scmp.com/news/world/art...hose-they-injure-and-permanently-disable-many
Again, I as the question, why is it anti gun liberals continually advocate actions to remove guns that will result in taking lives? Is the taking of life justified by the notion that it’s only likely those in political opposition will suffer the consequences?

 

They could use this as their symbol.

 

Think about this, who would ever consider putting together a mob of million sociopaths to go out to violate peoples rights in order to collect firearms?

And the reason I use the term sociopath is because that is the only type of person who would consider taking such a job where one is required to stick guns in innocent peoples faces and threaten their lives, or fire rounds in front of them to scare them into complying?

These are the types of people law enforcement hunts down, not cooperates with.

What the OP doesn't understand is law enforcement at all levels is a brotherhood and they being such tend to self protect their turf's, they don't appreciate outsiders coming around and playing cop, in fact it's really not a good idea to do so one can get hard time for doing so, and it's a extremely bad idea to do so violently and in violation of the rights of the law abiding, because that's when the gloves come off and law enforcement gets military like and they have the weaponry and training to quash such.

And it would be law enforcement both local and federal who would be rolling out the heavy hardware to take them out, should they not quickly surrender and be arrested, after which they and their leadership would be prosecuted and sentenced to multiple life sentences at the federal level or death at the state level depending on how the U.S. Attorneys wants to play the case out.

The OP's idea is screwy from the ground up, I can assure you he wouldn't get to a thousand members before the FBI, BATF, DEA, ICE, IRS and local law enforcement working together built a package on him, and his crew a mile high, which would be walked over to the U.S. Attorneys Office as an Information and then they (law enforcement) would be handed the proper warrants to go out and dismantle the OP's organization and arrest everyone involved, should they be wise enough to surrender.

Don't want to surrender, not a problem, think Waco on steroids.

 

Hey easy now, at Bell South I was part of the SS, my ID being SS673.

 

If your LEO's are firing warning shots yep I agree that's crazy and very dangerous.

 

I'm from Texas dude, most of our cops don't even say "stop" or "don't move" or "freeze dirt bag".
If they think they can light you up they will and they're not shy about doing it.

 

Then maybe it would be wise to cease interacting with them on a negative basis.

 

You think I'm saying a) I've been shot at and b) something negative about police, because I point out factually that Texas cops aren't shy with applying deadly force if they think they have the legal authority? O boy. You're one of those special sorts that needs extra attention huh?

You need to learn to read and not project yourself into the speaker or assume negativity just because I often point out that you're factually wrong or have a foolish opinion. Instead, listen/read what the speaker is actually saying in each instance so you can actually understand what's being said and not embarrass yourself. AGAIN. This is after all perhaps the 5th or 6th time you've done this ****, hell we just did the dance yesterday for ****'s sake man and frankly its getting really ******ned annoying.

You know, when I saw that post you made the other day showing the inside of your vehicle it suddenly became clear why you are the way that you are. I don't know what it is about your job that attracts your type but man are there sure a mess of you mixed in with the few good ones.

 

Why exactly would warning shots be a thing, unless law enforcement had good reason to not only be armed, but also to discharge their firearms?

 

Based on the wording of your post, I can understand why you have such negative reactions with law enforcement.

 

Yeah cause in Europe they know its about protecting people not taking lives.
Which I applaud

 

And by the way, other than is needs to be vacuumed, what wrong with my van?

 

Because they don't have a kill boner like US cops. They actually put themselves in harms way to apprehend instead of just unloading and killing suspects. If any other nations police force killed 1000 and injured 2 thousand a year with guns they would be seen as tyrannical

 

Innocent bystanders can easily be struck and killed by warning shots if the law enforcement officer is not paying attention to what they are doing.

 

I don't know man, ask the Euros.

 

It has long been held that law enforcement officers in the united states would never qualify in other countries, due to other countries having higher standards of conduct and training.

Such is not relevant to the question, however. Why would law enforcement officers in European countries actually fire warning shots, unless firearms were actually needed in these countries outside the united states, which are supposed to be peaceful and safe in comparison to the united states?

 

Still not getting it eh?

Well keep flailing around, I'm sure you'll catch on eventually.

 

Sending high speed projectiles into uncertain back stops (like the street or a wall. ) causing them to ricochet endangering bystanders, and the police officer using the weapon, isn't protecting people. Its reckless endangerment.
Don't even get me started about the idea of firing into the air.
You people need to have your heads examined.