The blatantly false liberal mantra "Races differ ONLY in skin color"

This is one of the most common pronouncements on race by liberal morons. It is also very easy to see that it is false. Eastern Asians have epicanthic folds. Sub-saharan Africans have prognathous jaws and a longer armspan-to-height ratio. They also have tightly coiled hair, whereas eastern Asians have very straight hair. These non-skin-pigmentation differences are just the tip of the iceberg.

Answer this, liberals: If races differ only in skin color, why can law enforcement determine the race of a corpse when only skeletal remains are left?

Anyone who really believes this must suffer from a severe form of mental retardation.

 

I have gotten to the point where I just ignore liberals with this mentality. I see *******s on here constantly post "define white?" or "there's no such thing as race, we're all the same" when you try to discuss race. You can't reason with intellectual redundancy on that level. It's on the same level as trolling so it's not even worth addressing.

To be honest, I've only encountered one intelligent liberal on this forum so far and that was Speedingtime. But I haven't seen him post for awhile.

 

Wow, what a strawman. Can you site one source, liberal or otherwise, that says the "only" difference is skin color? That's like saying IQ is the only difference between racists and those who aren't racists.

 

What exactly are you getting at with this thread? Maybe I've lived a sheltered life, but I've never heard anyone (left or right) claim that skin color is the only difference. There are many differences between racial groups, both genetically and visibly, and most of it has to do with the evolutionary adaptability processes to differing environments over millions of years. Only very recently (last couple thousand years or so) have the races started to move out of their original geographic regions on any large scale, so you could also say that racially geographic exclusion in the evolutionary process played a large part as well.

Differences exist, yes. I'm just curious as to the point of this thread, and without judging before you have a chance to answer it sounds as if you're suggesting that racial differences also mean we're not all "human" or of the same lineage. My apologies if this is not what you intended to say, but it sure reads that way.

 

The word is cite.

If you were experienced with racial debates you'd know an extremely common liberal/anti-racist argument is "we're all the same underneath" and "why do you hate people with different color skin as you, man?"

Why don't you concentrate on topics you know stuff about?

 

Races surely do not differ only in skin color, and I dont think any intelligent liberal would claim that. I can easily imagine some "*******s" claiming it, tough. You will find ignorant people everywhere.

 

I'm going to agree with you, but a hell of a lot of *******s seem to use that argument.

 

They can't.

 

Depends on your definition of "determine". My quick google search showed that the accuracy is around 80-90 %.

http://books.google.cz/books?id=amYgtnfJNXIC&printsec=frontcover&hl=sk#v=onepage&q&f=false (page 117)

 

The problem is not race god(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*). The issue is culture. The federal govt. ******it has killed the Black Family. Killed it dead. Now it's time to kill the ****** federal govt.

 

My money is on the American Government ... but good Luck!

 

Your assets are denominated in dollars. You're the one in need of luck.

 

Depends on your definition of race.

If you are using the 1779 hate propaganda of some german then you are wildly misled.

 

TC seems like a troll.

 

Neither statement supports your argument. There are differences between people of different races other than their skin color, there are differences between people living in different zip codes beside their zip code. Neither of those assertions conflicts with the idea that underneath all the superficial differences people are just people and hating someone for those superficial differences is ... well it's just stupid.​

 

There is also a vast difference in intelligence between Europeans and euro- americans for example.

This is the main reason why euro-americans are the most racist ppl on the planet, because they are ridiculed so bad by europeans, therefore they have to find someone to look down on otherwise they will appear to be at the bottom of the ladder.

 

Absolute unsubstantiated rubbish. If you think America is the most racist nation on the planet then I would suggest you provide some proof to back this claim up. Are you really claiming places in the Middle East, Southern Africa, Europe, and Central America are not as racially motivated as the US? Heck, I know first hand there are places in the UK that are just as bad if not worse...and that's just one area.

 

I'll do more than cite one source:

"Race Is Only Skin Deep": http://www.citybeat.com/cincinnati/article-17107-race-is-only-skin-deep.html

"RACE - Only Skin Deep": http://www.understandingrace.org/humvar/skin_01.html

 

I'm getting at the ignorance and lack of critical thinking skills among certain sectors of the Left.

 

[This is in response to my words "Answer this, liberals: If races differ only in skin color, why can law enforcement determine the race of a corpse when only skeletal remains are left?"]

http://shs.westport.k12.ct.us/forensics/11-forensic_anthropology/skeletal_analysis_worksheet.htm

http://www.anthro4n6.net/forensics/

http://www.forensic-medecine.info/forensic-anthropology.html

EPIC FAIL

 

Yeah, he is really off base with that post.

 

Culture is determined in part by genes.

 

Forensic anthropologists can identify the region of origin of a corpse. Face it, you're wrong.

 

Who is TC?