The Economist - "Inequality or middle incomes: which matters more?"

Discussion in 'Economics & Trade' started by LafayetteBis, Jan 10, 2017.

  1. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And you said it was inefficient. How was it inefficient?
     
  2. TedintheShed

    TedintheShed Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,301
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's not a free market guy, he is a fledgling neo-chartalist.
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2017
    Longshot likes this.
  3. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    a banker in one town had to guess at value of currency from another town so the towns could trade. Welcome to your ABC's.
     
  4. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd say a free market guy. If you disagree please say why or admit you cant.
     
  5. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So it was handled in such a way the prevented any unemployment or loss of production?
     
  6. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You object to a free market in money. Not a free market guy.
     
    TedintheShed likes this.
  7. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How is this inefficient? Isn't that a banker's job?
     
  8. TedintheShed

    TedintheShed Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,301
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you a Republican that believes in a strong military?
     
  9. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yes and????????????
     
  10. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    bankers job to guess at the relative value of 2000 currencies with little to no information to go on??? Wrong!!! if they were in that situation they would lobby for one currency because it is far more efficient for an economy.Welcome to your ABC's
     
  11. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    not really your call, Friedman was know as perhaps the greatest free market guy ever and he supported central banking. A free market in money might have worked out in time but we'll never know since the probably of going back and climbing that learning curve is far less than 0%
     
  12. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    don't be goofy no economy has ever been handled that way. Do you know what a straw man is??
     
  13. TedintheShed

    TedintheShed Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,301
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Republican (authoritarian)? Check.

    Believes in a strong military (what backs neo-chartalism)? Check.

    Supports a fiat based centralized bank? Check.

    You are a neo-chartalist.

    Not free market
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2017
    Longshot likes this.
  14. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you object to a free market in money, and you claim to be for the free market?
     
  15. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So it the bust of 2008 wasn't trivial, as it resulted in massive unemployment and decreases in production. Your contention that booms and busts have been eliminated is incorrect.
     
  16. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    significant booms and busts have been largely eliminated in USA China Europe based on huge and growing experience with monetary policy
     
  17. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yep me an Milton!! I don't object to a free market in money in theory but going back would cause huge recessions and depressions as we learned how to manage it plus there is less than 0% support for it so it is really not worth considering.
     
  18. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A banker, if he thought it would be more efficient, could refuse to deal with 2000 currencies. He could insist on accepting one, two, or three specific currencies. If he thought that would be more efficient.
     
  19. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Except for the dot-com bubble and the 2008 housing bubble.
     
  20. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So you're not for a free market in money. We hear that.

    "but going back would cause huge recessions and depressions as we learned how to manage it"

    Why?
     
  21. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    why??? because we have no magic want to wipe out current system, agree to new one, establish new one, and instantly gain 100 years of experience with it. Welcome to your Abc's
     
  22. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And this is your stance with regards to all government interference in the market? We should continue it because we have no magic wand?
     
    Last edited: Jun 15, 2017
  23. james M

    james M Banned

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2014
    Messages:
    12,916
    Likes Received:
    858
    Trophy Points:
    113
    all?????????we are talking about money only
     
  24. Longshot

    Longshot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2011
    Messages:
    18,068
    Likes Received:
    2,644
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And this is your stance with regards to government interference in money? We should continue it because we have no magic wand?
     
  25. TedintheShed

    TedintheShed Banned

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2010
    Messages:
    5,301
    Likes Received:
    1,983
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't think he realizes that you can't be pro Fed and still be considered pro free market.
     
    Longshot likes this.

Share This Page