You cant make this crap up: Defamation of religion and the United Nations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation_of_religion_and_the_United_Nations "The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others." (Clinton) The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." (Obama) It is not the end of the Internet for everything to be connectedcars, refrigerators, power meter, weight scales, TV, and parking lots--it just means governments can be a bigger threat to freedom while the mob is thinking they are obtaining it. Linux could be the kernel, but if you have no access to it, cant read the source, and understand it, you have no idea what it is doing; the few that do, can be easily dealt with. All they need is five unelected liberals to grant special acceptance of something they couldnt get though Congress, baby steps everyone loves, One nation, One Law, and the precedent is set for absolute tyranny, to interpret that inequity of property is a violation of equal protections, because money is power, and we are a congregation working toward Economic Parity, to interpret that hate speech is a violation of equal protections and to slander a Prophet violates Equal protections of the laws, because hate leads to the dark side, it leads to elections, which leads to lost rights and leadership we do not need. Speech is the number one key to consent of the governed, but it never has maintained a kind of leadership, there has always been a Brutus, but now his refrigerator or car might rat him out, his walls will talk, and "Part of American leadership is making sure that were doing nation building here at home. That will help us maintain the kind of American leadership that we need," so the final solution of rejecting a future will be much easier:
And I thought you were going to ask Cortana out on a date. Don't worry about those poor sites, Bernie and Clinton will subsidize them right along with higher education...who needs advertising when we are all equally protected with economic Parity? It is just a matter of interpretation.