Let me have my manner and start from something subjective as a way to introduce people to my political beliefs. Now I love the fact Sir Sylvester Stallone supports Sir Arnold Schwarzenegger and reverse. They really deserve each other and I think they should be given a chance (by all the fans) to proove there's something special about their friendship. Now Slide Stallone said a whole plenty of times that Arnold should be the President of the U.S.A. and for Sly He seems the best candidate. Let it be so. I think He has the best pattern for being a President. But whenever I speak to somebody engaged in politics of the USA, the left and the right side say that "a lot of Americans would love Sylvester Stallone to become the President". Now, one might disagree and say that the final thing that matters - the Law that forbids anybody not born in the USA to become the President of the USA - that thing seems to be way too cruel, and some people do wanna change it. They want to change it, since they want the America to become "sort of" more of a free country, but I guess that's the critical point of USA to have regulations like that, that make the whole thing go. One might start a debate over that, but unfortunately if it leads to conclusion, that these things jave to be changed - the whole debate would be just so wrong. This is not a matter of a global village, just because people use that argument without defining what the global village is and how free it is. Laws like enabling people become the citizens of the USA just because using one owns effeort to swim by oone's own forces to the coast of USA - that might look like a nonsense, but changing it is a total misunderstanding. America has the best migration politics ever and it just did not appear because YOu, Americans, are sort of a better people, but it did appear thanks to the fact YOu let bright people in a long distance past set the conditions of what YOur governemnt should be like. A whole lot of that was a matter of compromise, and now, since people got a lot more responsible and sensitive, they won't support things that have to be changed. I am sorry, America has to go through the process of deep recreation and the most important thing to do about it is the support of the governent given to the nation, so that when the whole system is being broke and rebuilt, the American Nation is going to be through a Perfect Storm no-ne can joke about. My suggestion is that let's stay who everyone is and cooperate knowing there's a sollution to all this - a system that is universal and common to everybody, so I guess there has to be a lot of Internet discussion and lots of single people living their vision should be given a right to express (under some conditions) what they say about the future of the Law, the political stability etc. etc. The thing has to e a debate and a dialogue. One thing is that the future President, even though He or She might have strong relations with one of the parties, should leave any political fractions to become "the President of all of the Americans". The candidate that is not related to any party is the only sollution even though some political fraction will probably support Him or Her more, than the OTHER. The other thing is that making the political diversion DUAL always makes it AMBIVALENT. It always playing "the good guys" and "the wrong girls", wich is totally sick. I know the Democrats in the USA are a strong determination of the Centre-Left and it's always been like that, but can anybody tell me whether Republicans are the Conservatives or Liberals? It appears they're both at the same time which is a total nonsense. My suggestion is of course the Two Chambers: - Lower Chamber (Sejm in Poland), states the Law that has to be verified by the Senat and after that the President has to underwrite all that - in critical situations the President can send the Law to the Constitutional Tribunal to be judged, but He might also use a strategy of signing something He disagrees with and it start to see the light, but on the other hand after signing it send it to the Constitutional Tribunal to verify the accuracy of the Law with the Constitution. - The Prime Chamber (Senat in Poland) - should have strong relation to public consultations, cotrols the Lower Chamber and its consultation are kept more of a secret (while it's public what Sejm (the Lower Chamber) does. The most important political function is the Prime Minister, but the President is the Head of everything in the Country. He holds the title of a President which is not a political function, but even after maximum two cadencies once He became the President, He or She will always stay that, even after the death. I really do believe there should be some great luxury Island for the Past Presidents of different countries, where they can only have the only way to start a debate and be in a contact with anybody through an Internet Official Political Platform. Now what I take as new, something that is a consensus of what we have in USA and what we have in America i a tripple-party-diversion. Lets say there are 400 sits in the Lower chamber. The three PARTIES: - centreleft - conservatives - liberals each have always 20% of the sits. That makes 80 sits per every formation. But YOu do not vote for any of these people and they may declare some, let's say 300 people that can join the 80 sits, A matter of "not a full house" is a matter of a discipline and the party gets its butt kicked for that. YOu do not vote for these people, but YOu vote for 10% of minorities and 30% of selfmade campaigns by people that dared to try to make a change and after all they succeeded. The question who becomes the Prime Minister and what the whole politics is going to be like: 1. First - that does not relate to any of ideological disagreement 2 . The politics is deifinitelly in the hands of people, that really did a lot more by themselves, than the ones that are a part of a party and are the part of the strong process of promotion - they've been like that for a very long time, they work hard but they do not have that comfort of relating to things from a distance and especially they are so deep in the game, they lost lots of the right priorities. They need fresh blood. 3. The vision of three parties is absolute, because making more parties means foreign secret forces speculations (like in Poland) and when we deal with two people - we do ot have a group, but sociologically when we have three people, all the processes of the groups start. Nowadays the double-party system only causes some mess, where people fight not for the right or wrong, but do everything, so that the opposite side does not succeed. Tha Nation is watching AND REALLLY. GET YOUR LIFE! NOBODY HAS TIME FOR THAT!
Now, the fact that I just started an imprtant debate look for: [Sir John Glubb, THE FATE OF EMPIRES and SEARCH FOR SURVIVAL, http://people.uncw.edu/kozloffm/glubb.pdf]. and I got only five views does not mean almost anything to me. There are lots of YOu, really born in America defining America as something that relates only to YOu, and when it comes to a discussion, the only opinion is that guys like me have no right to say about anything that relates to the U.S. of A. Yea, right! First thing is that every political forum has to deal with lots of spammers that work from the outside of the U.S. and work on a potential terroristical danger that does not only mean threatening the whole country by something like 9/11. Well? It realtes to blocking the fact of what America is for the thinking part of it, and the whole world. They block lots of promising opportunities and they get paid for that. On the other hand we have people that write the same ol' esh everyday. Like there was "a race issue" the most important problem of them all. Perhaps it is for some, but these guys just think they know what they're doing. They spam the political forum (unfortunatelly that is why the Republicans have nothing to say right now) with the problems, people said enough about. Like - 1. there is a problem, 2. there comes a visioner that solves it, 3. there come people who hide that fact and use their "cruel" (but of course ridiculous) techniques everyday thinking they're so much in the power no-one is able to fight against. Simple conspiracy theories to keep the kind of order some brood would like to preserve. So what is the technique? Notice that everyday there are at least few topics that relate to the "race issue". Race is no messure one can compare with humans, nor plant, nor viruses, nor mushrooms, nor bacterias... etc. etc. it only relates to the animals. We, humans divide into ethnicities, but "who cares" as getting that knowledge is far from American High-School and the Studies are for the elitte either of people to ugly not to be a nerd of the elitte of "wealthy ones that leran their way to steal from the others". "YO F... that!", we have a "rece issue"... guessssss what? Everyday! These people with the enormous numbers of post written start usually gently suggesting they wanna talk about the problem. Who does not start it like that? Now the Republicans strongly believe they're sort of "TOUCHED BY THE ALMIGHTY" and whatever they do, they do it right. Not me to judge this I accept that as a fact of a special sort of sensitivity, that's surely enough for others to have. Unfortunately At that point "the whole thing breaks". These "people" are reallllly so pooooor in their judgement, that the only thing that keeps them saying what they say is their own subjective (and leveled up by themselves) opinion about themselves. The more drastic is the fact they strongly believe God was more of a God to give them a right to say all that crap. Everyday, same ol' esh. Same old topics of the things America was through hundred years ago. It looks like a joke nobody really even think about selling it. It's impossible and the fact of watching this crap is disguisting. It's like one guy is born in his head with a thought "HI, my name is John J. Doe and I am the most important guy in Amrerica, because the America is me, and I am the only true American". Objectively that is not patriotism, but a nationalism (patriotism is about love, nationalism is about hate, so these are the two things that really differ in everything). Okay, let's say not everyone has to be bright.... some can take the responsibility of a better tommorow and understand the real issue better than the others, and by giving that people any support... they may becaome importnat enough tomake a change. Still I think that the fight between Republicans and Democrats is irrelevant in politics, but some just think the show has to go on, so that people do not have real problems, but dellusional ones. BUUUUUTTTTT! As I see the banner how much money the forum did get - that brakes my heart. I will only say that. There are just pople with valluable opinions who just cannot afford the everyday drama of expressing what the politics mean to them. WHY? Just because when they try to mention anything... these spammers write bazillions of threads and posts to it about the SAME OL' ESH and practically facts that are no longer a part of any discussion in any part of the world. Really, we went far from that and since "everage is dangerous" the middle-class not working because of egoism or altruism, but because of social debt - had a plenty of time to be more rational and had a full planty of arguments to see the real thing from a needed distance with a little more comfort to think. Don't YOu think, that whenever YOu try to mention that SAME OL' ESH day and night with a "proper" manner, that YOu think realtes to "real" POLITICS all that can be done as a comment of people judging YOu is "okay, let's forget that. I'd be better doing masturbation on my own than debating over a drama everyone knows a sollution for". And we see these Democrats and Republicans with damaged headphones in their ears, while these "politicians" repeat something that does not come from them, but some well paid guy (by the fact they always lie about who the person really is) wrote some story based on some cheap tv-novel, but the most should not have a chance to view all of the movies, so let's say there's a less percentage of the guys who are deadly F...d up about the fact it is so CHEAAAP! Let that even be. But there come here people still wanting to suggest somethin' and when it comes to a discussion - they start these (oh so wrong) topics, to mention after twenty replies, that God spoke to them while they were digesting and told them OBAMA's a devil... let's get right of all the devilS! YOu might use a whole arsenal of YOur sick "knowledge". Anything that lacks the vallue of egalitarianism is crap! Anything that is not an elementary naivity translated to any of the mabition instances - is a CRAP! If YOu have something that says somebody's objectivelly always better than the others - THAT IS CRAP!
