Raffensperger will be there, along with other state officials Trump or his minions pressured to do illegal things. But the fireworks will be about his involvement in the planning of the Jan 6 conspiracy. Our Excuse Junkies will be in manic denial mode manana...
Adam Shifty says he has real evidence... We have all heard that before. And why does Garland need these hearings to get the information that Schiffty says that he has again? I mean, because it likely doesn't actually exist, and Garland is too stupid to recognize it seems the most likely explanation... Meanwhile, the country suffers under 9% inflation and food/services/supply disruptions all imposed on the nation by the hacks at the Xiden administration...
on the cspan schedule for 0900 tuesday. or did they move it up? we don't know what is up with garland. i'm betting on epstein has him on video tape so he will never allow a prosecution of the cirrent holder of those tapes. equally likely is the "secret justice dept memoradum" that former presidents are not subject to the law or the self pardon. at any rate, it is beginning to look like the only way to make this evidence public is through the committee, which is doing one hell of a job. so luggit, are you suggesting that if the committee disbands the inflation rate will decline?
Well there won’t be a judge or a Lawyer to call bullshit on Schiff fabricating of evidence out of thin air and making up stories as he goes along this time. This is about the perfect speed for Schiff.
Well it’s easy to make a case when you can simply make it up as you go along, introduce evidence that supports your telling of events and refuse to introduce evidence that does not support your telling of events, you don’t have to deal with cross examination or rebuttal, the defendant isn’t present and isn’t allowed to have a defense and you have nothing but grossly partisan “judges”. I wonder if Schiff will fabricate portions of another narrative today like he did in the impeachment… or hell since he doesn’t actually have to prove his position, he can just fabricate it out of whole clothe and say how Trump was colluding with the Proud Boys and the Mafia and the KKK and the ghosts of Adolf Hitler and the leaders of the confederacy to overthrow the government lol
Hmm... Did you suppose that I wrote that as an assertion? Cause I didn't. I suppose the nuance of suggesting that law makers grand standing instead of actually legislating solutions to current ills of the nation was too opaque for you to discern... You have to admit though that while they fiddle the nation and it's economy are burning down, huh... But Shifty has "evidence", the "wolf" of the story so to speak. When you recover from your sudden awareness that the evil Stephen Colbert did using his staff, assault and defame the hallowed grounds of the capital building, and found their evil plot undone before they could wreck democracy as we know it.... I suspect that Shifty will have the inside track on getting to the bottom of that, given the number of democrats who facilitated the horrific attack against our nation....
I nominate Shiff for best performance by a Thespian in congress this year.. Do you think he will take on the Colbert Assault on freedom today? he was pretty quiet yesterday.. the horror... insurrection from the "Comedian" Colbert....
Trumps said - he could shoot someone and his base would not only forgive him but seems they would start claiming the victim ran into the bullet himself
I suspect he was channeling his inner .... gasp..... Ted Kennedy who literally drowned his girlfriend and was elected in perpetuity in the US senate... Of course, so far as Adam Schiff is concerned, no assertion that Trump actually shot anyone has surfaced....
Nearly all of the *sworn* testimony has been Republicans. Nearly all of what Trump and his crazies has been saying is "fabricating of evidence out of thin air and making up stories" and you know it. Project much?
No Schiff is on record fabricating a phone call to a house testimonial hearing. What’s to say he won’t just do it again? In so far as the republicans you’re talking about, they’re being fed leading questions which would never be allowed in a court of law, their testimony is being edited and truncated to not include portions that are detrimental to the case and they’re not allowed to be cross examined. This is a pathetic fraud of a sham which will NEVER see a court room because it would NEVER hold up. Furthermore they’ve tainted ANY possibility of a fair trial so that this CANT go to court lol Which they did on purpose because they KNOW they don’t have enough for an actual court. Hence why they’re playing this out on prime time television. To attempt to influence as many people as they can with their little scam here and then smash Garland for not taking him to court. When they KNOW there’s not a DA in the country with two brain cells to rub together who would ever let this see a court room.
Easy solution here. Trump can tell his story—testify—to the committee. They’d certainly accommodate him and the networks would offer space in prime time to insure his story reached the widest audience. The same applies to Meadows, Scavino, Navarro, Meadows, Bannon, McCarthy, Jordan, Brooks, Perry, Jackson, Biggs, Cruz, Hawley, and Thomas. There is absolutely nothing standing in the way of that becoming reality. Well, with exception to the forum requiring them to testify under oath.
One mistake versus a thousand deliberate lies... I have no doubt you can find a few leading questions, but what about the other 99% that are perfectly admissible.. It's already in courtrooms, pay attention.. And there will be more criminal charges, of that there is no doubt. You need news sources that have, oh, what do they call it? Oh yeah, news...