The ineffectiveness of Ron Paul

It would seem that you're not very well informed about Paul's plans.

 

it would seem you are less informed by the other candidates' plans.

 

What Other Candidates Have Given Out That Level Of Detail About All Their Ideas?

If None Has Then Why Do You Expect Ron Paul To?

 

And what is your proof of this?

For you to answer this, you would have to know exactly what I do know and do not know about Ron Paul's policies.

So tell me, what do I know about his policies and what do I not know about his policies?

 

He clearly does not have a clue about Ron Paul's economic policies as he claimed he did but then I proved that he did not.

So he speaks of things he knows little about - even though he claims he knows much about them.

 

If you don't know then I sure can't help you.

 

So you admit you do not know.

Then if you do not know - then you have no basis to make the judgement you did.

So your opinion means nothing...just as I knew.




What Other Candidates Have Given Out That Level Of Detail About All Their Ideas?

If None Has Then Why Do You Expect Ron Paul To?


Why are you apparently afraid to answer?

 

to sound clever ?

 

BTW - here is a post from Jason Bourne:

'I'll admit, Ron Paul is quite well informed when it comes to the economy and the need to at the very least audit the FRB.'

http://www.politicalforum.com/1060916213-post9.html

'I should add that I also like his stance on immigration.'

http://www.politicalforum.com/1060916229-post11.html

 

I strongly believe that Jason Bourne is SO negatively obsessed with Ron Paul that he goes around the net and looks for topics that he cannot find a detailed breakdown from Ron Paul on.

When he finds one, I think he then asks that question (knowing there is no possible answer) on a thread he created so that he can try and flame bait and troll.

If this is true, then not only is he a troll and a flamebaiter, but he is also a liar - claiming he wants to know the answer to something that he knows has no applicable answer.

 

what do you expect a gold securities salesman to say?

ron paul helps him do his job spreading the word that the sky is going to fall and recruiting greater fools to buy gold at $1650/oz

 

And just how would that benefit Paul?? Is this like the other claim of Michael Maloney endorsing Ron Paul (You know...when he did back in 2008 and only gave $300 to the campaign...)

 

are you saying an endorsement from jim rogers is of no benefit to ron paul?

 

Lame deflection.

Jim Rogers lives in Singapore and having Paul as POTUS makes little difference to him financially. Rogers supports the philosophy.

 

you're projecting

this is a political forum, i'm speaking of political benefits, jim rogers appears regularly on tv in the usa

 

Exactly why they're unconstutional and must be abolished

 

but my question was "where does the federal govt get the money to pay the interest on its securities to the fed".

 

Yes, he appears on television to discuss financial matters... you still haven't explained why Ron Paul becoming POTUS is in his best interest.

 

look it up, it's irrelevant to my assertion

i haven't explained what 2 + 2 equals, either

 

Why do you have such a hard time giving a straight answer?

 

And are likely incapable of that as well.

 

it's your perception that's crooked, my answer is straight as an arrow

you go ahead and cling to that mistaken idea if it gives you comfort

i can integrate a polynomial to the fourth degree, almost as easily as determining a simple sum

 

Yeah...I'm sure that's it

(Why do I get the feeling the sarcasm of my post is going to go right over your head...)

 

because you're not so facile with gauging reality

 

Says the person who thinks the other candidates like Romney or Santorum are not just as bad as Obama...