The Mission Statement

Oh please, do tell about some of these "White Utopias". Sounds fascinating. We might be able to get something going... a little project to help with plane fare...

"I am real interested in all this. I would be in heaven if I could find a place where I never would have to see another White girl with her jiving negro and never see a White man with his stammering Viet Namesese wench. The election of Obami the mulatto commie has made me really sick.
I was investigating N.Z.and Australia. Wikapedia says N.Z. is only 68% White but Australia is 92% White?? I think N.Z. is easier to move to government wise, but did'nt they just elect a jew as a PM?
I would sure appreciate any help anyone in New Zealand and Australia could give me."

 

Well they've done it before, haven't they. The intolerant I mean, not just racists. Because intolerance often works across the board, if there is racial intolerance it usually extends to sexism, atheism (in this case I mean hatred of atheists, not people who are atheists...what is the correct word for a hater of atheists, btw?) etc etc. The US originals contained a fair number of intolerant extremists who couldn't conform to the norm in the country they came from and threw the toys out of the pram and bolted, rather than do the work to conform. I expect the descendants of these people are the same fundies who think they are peace-loving caring and sharing Christians, while wanting to shoot any non-white-supremacist and send atheists for a perpetual torture, roast and burning in hell fire for the heinous crime of being realism...in other words, anyone they think doesn't conform to their narrow view (having forgotten their ancestors conformed to feck all and had to make up their culture as they went along).

One wonders why, if they are so unhappy with the status quo in the country with an history of diversity...they don't bugger off to another new world and try to wipe out another indigenous people to establish a reign of white supremacy. Perhaps they lack the initiative of their predecessors.

 

I'll say to you what you said to Todd...(high pitched whingy voice) My views are just as valid on this forum...bla bla bla

You could try the even more radical step of seeing the practical need for temporary positive action to eradicate or at least reduce economic disparity between ethnicities and for inclusion, not exclusion as the way to resolve and dissolve racist issues.

 

Racism is absolutely born from ignorance...

Ignorance of another's culture...

And then, racist parents pass that BS on to their kids, and the cycle begins again...

Saddest (*)(*)(*)(*) ever...

 

Ignorance of another's culture?? Get real LOL! To know black culture is to despise black culture... unless, of course, you're pro-crime, pro-violence, pro-obnoxiousness, pro-stupidity, pro-uncivilized-behavior and pro-drugs. Which most anti-racist/anti-White people are anyway.

And then, anti-racist/anti-White parents pass that moral depravity on to their kids, and the cycle begins again...

That really is the saddest (*)(*)(*)(*) ever...

 

Anyway, this thread is about the Mission Statement so I'll thank you all for not rambling off-topic from your high horses. As much as you want it to be, racism is NOT wrong, YOU just disagree with it. The Mission Statement clearly states that anyone from all walks of life is allowed to express their views here, no matter how unorthodox and inflammatory those views may be. So I don't want to see any moderators giving me infractions for stating black "people" are stupid... which in my opinion they are... and I don't want to see anymore anti-racist/anti-White liberals whinging about the number of racist threads around the forum. Racism is an ideology that YOU happen to disagree with. Get over it and respect that my beliefs are allowed on this forum.

 

Giving the mods orders?

Lol, that always works out REAL well. Good luck with that.

As for your "racism isn't wrong" statement, I'm sure that pedophiles see it the same way about their vice.

 

Pedophilia is a serious crime. Disliking black "people" isn't.

Nice try though.

 

Taking the time to post thread after thread of racist garbage is a bit more than "disliking" black people.

It's an abnormal obsession.

 

Not really. I live in a black majority neighborhood, so it's quite a relevant topic to me. Black violence and uselessness, as well as gunshots, drug dealing, etc, etc are all around me in my personal life. I feel it's worth addressing.

 

You can address them all that you want. However, the forum has rules particularly against flamebaiting. It also doesn't help that you refuse to adhere to sections and feel that you can dump every piece of racist garbage that you glean off Stormfront or whatever "White Power" website you use as your source of disinformation.

 

I'm not 100% White, so again, nice try at generalizing.

I post my extremely informative articles in the correct sections. Racial news is current events also. I sincerely hope you're not considering a career as a moderator, because you don't appear to understand many things about the forum and news. I can't help it if you'd prefer to read about who won American Idol instead of the REAL news.

Rambling off-topic is also against forum rules, but you're having no trouble doing that here in this thread.

 

What you want to see is of no concern to anyone. Racism is entirely wrong and if you post stupid or hateful views then people will tell you your views are stupid and wrong. If you don't want to read that, don't post incitement to racial hatred. Which is in fact a crime in this country and considered wrong as evidenced by law, so do stop by and have a go at disseminating racial hatred here.

As to saying a particular ethnicity is stupid, making unevidenced blanket judgements on an entire ethnicity based on the perceived issues of a few indicates questionable intellect in itself...

 

I bet the OP secretly wishes he had been born black.

 

Respect is earned when people respect what others do and who those others are and what those others stand for.

Saying your views are to be respected no matter what, shows how little you understand about the human condition and that of human interaction.

The majority of people do not respect racist views. And a Mission Statement won't buy you that respect either.

Respectful views are far more respected... than of those views that trash the human spirit of others.

Sanity will prevail.

Respect can never be demanded. It has to be EARNED.

 

I too have been facing the same bud. There are people ( mods and posters ) on this forum that get away with flamebaiting people they deem to be racist but if we reply in kind we get in the sh**. I have received infractions and warnings for it yet the insulting posts i was replying to stays and mine gets deleted. There has to be FAIRNESS in the way this is dealt with, fairness we are yet to see.

 

I'm going to lock this thread, because it's already going downhill with mutual baiting (and its ground we've been over before several times anyway). Regarding 'racism', 'racist opinion', 'opinions which may (in the opinion of others) be based on racism', 'racists', 'alledged racists' and so on, the answer to the question is quite simple, and the rules are quite clear:

Members MAY express opinions which are, or may be percieved to be, 'racist'.
Members MUST post any such opinions within the forum rules and spirit of the Mission Statement.
Abuse is NOT considered simple 'an expression of opinion' - there is a big difference between expressing an opinion based on 'racism' and posting racist abuse.
Other members MAY challenge any opinions posted by others, including opinions they believe to be 'racist'.
The MUST do so within the forum rules and spirit of the Mission Statement - that means they may not insult or attack or harass the member they believe is posting 'racist opinions', or specifically bait such members, but they are free to challenge those opinions even if the people who posted them do not like being challenged. Challenging an opinion is not 'flamebaiting'.

In the specific example above of calling people of a certain race 'stupid', if it were simply to be an isolated and unsupported statement to that effect it would be likely to be considered as 'abuse' (which is NOT allowed). If, on the other hand, it were a discussive post, in the manner of 'respectful debate', about an opinion regarding the relative intelligence of different races, especially with 'evidence' of some sort to back it up, it would be seen as an 'expression of opinion' (which IS allowed, even if that opinion were to be unpopular, or others were to find it 'inflammatory'). Of course, the rules still apply to other members, and reacting to any statement which is a rule violation, or a non-violation that you don't happen to like, with a rule violation of your own is likely to get you into trouble (whether or not the original post violated the rules) - each member will be held responsible for their own posting behaviour, and 'but I thought so-and-so violated the rules first' is NOT considered as a valid defence or excuse (whether so-and-so did or not).

I hope that answers the question clearly enough for everyone.