Those anti-establishment pundits who support the official story

with all those repeated ad obnoxious nonresponsive/speculative posts Im expected to acknowledge its going to be a long thread

They dont have anything folks, thats the problem, so as you can see they push naked opinion disinfo and push it hard

 

This got rolled off the current page without a response. Viewers will also wonder what are the odds that "AE911" and their "quest for the truth" results in them commissioning a report from an expert in bridge building, then subsequently receiving a report that suggests it wasn't fire. Especially damning is that the report models 2 floors for fire, when 10 were on fire for many hours, unfought by any fire department! In addition, Hulsey arm waves away a report by Weidlinger that uses completely purpose build fire-modeling software, by suggesting some nonsense about it getting too hot when the quoted temperatures fall easily within normal building fire ranges.

 

Here's another anti-establishment pundit who agrees with the official story. Listen to him at the 4:25 time mark.

Larry Johnson Reveals TRUMP'S PLAN To DESTROY IRAN And BREAK The RUSSIA CHINA BRICS ALLIANCE

 

Scott Ritter seems to believe the official story. Start watching this at the 17:00 time mark.

Scott Ritter: Reality Hits Hard: Yemen Targets the U.S. Navy - Trump’s Wake-Up Call in Ukraine

 

At the 5:00 minute mark of this video Jeffry Sachs seems to believe the official story of 9/11.

Jeffrey Sachs: Understanding the Ukraine conflict (minidoc)



Here's another link to the video in post #104.

Larry Johnson EXPOSES Trump’s Plan to DESTROY Iran & BREAK the Russia-China BRICS Alliance
https://www.bing.com/videos/rivervi...tb=1&msockid=dbe3da9e3fe211f09f79b1bb20def1ad

 

Interested viewers will struggle to get the actual point of this ridiculous thread.

It seems to suggest that even a stopped clock is right twice a day. I think most sensible people get that. So there are people who go against the mainstream, who understand the ludicrous problems associated with any number of the dozen or so contradictory and very foolish conspiracy theories?

Needs a round of applause.

 

Those three guys aren't morons so they know 9/11 was an inside job. Jeffrey Sachs is a professor at Columbia university so he'd probably lose his position if he said what he thought about 9/11. The other two would probably lose their platforms on which they're able to speak about other important issues. I can understand their not saying what they really think.

(post #11)
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...rt-the-official-story.514874/#post-1068880658

 

You have it ass backwards

The stupidest people on earh believe it was an inside job

 

Hilarious. Identifying that they are conspiracy theorists..... right there is all the supposed grounds needed to "lose their platforms"!

Ludicrously suggesting you know what they are thinking.

Almost a quarter of a century later and STILL, this pathetic conspiracy persists in a dozen different forms!

• No planes
• Just two real planes.
• Three planes and one fake.
• Planes and nukes.
• Planes and space weapons.
• No planes and nukes.
• No planes and space weapons.
• Planes but not the real ones!
• The Jews did it(meh!)
• The Saudis did it.
• Al Qaeda did it but the US let it happen.
• A herd of wildebeest were somehow involved (forgive me for making one up - they all are anyway!).

 

This is a quote from this post.
http://politicalforum.com/index.php...orted-9-11-terrorists.456423/#post-1066183060

You mainly listed the bogus stuff the paid sophists put on the internet to confuse people.

 

Circular reasoning. We had one very keen poster who spent months trying to argue about no-planes! Are you saying he's lying about his motives!?

It's all bogus! I listed the one you have claimed, that is obvious horseshit. I find it staggering that you still make that foolish claim about "paid-sophists".

Interested viewers will wonder what year this joke conspiracy dries up. We're close to a quarter of a century now.