No worries. It's been common for Z's supporters to claim they "forgot" facts after being informed of them.
So being 6' tall doesn't justify being shot but being 6' 3" does?????? Do you guys even pay attention to what you are complaining about?
We do have enough facts to know it was unnecessary. Even if you want to believe Z's version from start to finish he still illegally killed Trayvon. The prosecutor Corey has already put people in prison for killing people who punched/slapped them. If you want to say Trayvon tried to grab Z's gun it is still Z's fault because from Trayvon's perspective, he was a stranger stalking him in his vehicle, then got out and continued to chase Trayvon after Trayon ran away. If someone stalked you then got in your face, pushed you, and you saw he had a gun, wouldn't you try to take it from him so he couldn't use it on you?
I'm sure even after Z is convicted of murder your camp will still claim he is not a murderer. That would mean admitting your camp was wrong....and that will never happen.
not hardly. The left has manufactured lies from the beginning on this. LOOK at George zimmerman...what a lying media to use old pictures of both parties. Now why would you suppose they would do something like that?? I'm still of the opinion that Trayvon was not out getting a snack but rather casing the neighborhood. I wouldn't be a bit surprised that he had been involved in prior community robberies. This was a young man headed in the wrong direction.
Your camp complaining about being spoon fed is freaking hilarious. You guys have been spoon fed everything you are using to defend Z and no evidence to back it up. In fact, the evidence shows his version cannot be true but you still ignore the facts and stick to the spoon fed fantasies.
Yeah. Trayvon was casing a neighborhood with skittles, tea, and talking with his girlfriend about some strange dude following him. The fact you even try to claim Trayvon was casing is beyond stupid but it shows how desperate you guys have become to defend Z.
Z's dad lied about what happened but you guys still use him as a source. It appears you don't care about lies being told as long as those lies help your position.
If endeavoring to take an objective, wait and see approach.... instead of parroting "facts" garnered through a cacophony of purposely misleading, painfully obvious jumps to conclusions.... presented by race hustlers and an agenda laden liberal media... equals "spoon fed"...well, sir or ma'am.....you can color me guilty. By the by....the only "camp" I belong to is the one that supports due process over histrionic lynch mobs.
It's been going both ways. Do you have absolute proof to separate fact from fiction? No, you don't - you weren't there that night either........
So the only person qualified to say what happened is the people that were there? That means Z is the only one that can tell us what happened. Seriously? I do know the facts of this case and as well as anyone else on here or in the public. Somehow it is arrogant and criminal to learn all known facts but I'm okay with that. The double standards by Z's defenders are unparalleled and embarrassing. When his ex lawyer said Z had a broken nose his defenders claimed it as fact even though we have video evidence proving it wasn't broken. The latest pic also helps prove Z did not have a broken nose. Or do people think the guy would take a pic of Z's head and ignore the broken nose?
This does raise the possibility that Z just got pissed off and capped him because Martin was kicking his ass.
Trayvon did not have any evidence on him of being in a fight. More than likely, his bloody nose and scratched head happened while they were wrestling.
Listen to the audio from :08 - :13. Hilarious. [video]http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/82409033/[/video]
How little you know me! It certainly isn't a mystery how old I am, since I have had my age published in my profile since the day I registered? It seems that you may be (mentally at least) at least 40 or 45 years younger than I. . .and you have no idea how grounded and satisfied with her life a 62 year old woman can be! Maybe you inherited your charming disposition from your mother or grandmother, and in that case, I can believe you see older women as bitter and unhappy! Who wouldn't be with such a sour outlook on life? Do 't worry, it gets better. . .if you allow a little kindness and faith in people inside you.
The fact is that trigger boy picked the fight with Martin and, under even the SYG law, had ZERO right to defend himself other than by saying "I"m sorry, sir," or by running away.
Well, it is significant that the old picture of trigger boy was a police mugshot after he had been arrested for assaultive behavior. You have sod all upon which to assume that. He didn't have anything to do with the recent crimes there because he WAS NOT THERE AT THE TIME. Do you get the implication of that? Arguing facts not in evidence.