Trayvon Martin Social Justice Award: A disconnect with reality.

Go look at the evidence dump . I'm like you , I don't use supporting facts .

 

Once again, cite from the Florida stalking law how Zimmermans actions were a stalking.

- - - Updated - - -

Where did I claim that it had to do with Zimmerman's actions?

 

He was asked by the dispatcher to tell them what the person did and where he went. Then he was asked "not to do that" id follow even though he wasn't following him at the time because he didn't know where Zimmerman was. This was long AFTER he had exited the truck and when asked "not to do that" he complied with their request.

Zimmerman had every legal right to observe Martin and even call in a suspicious person. He had every right to exit his truck to see which way Martin ran.

That ended the first confrontation.

Martin initiated the second, willingly so, and had no right to engage in a physical assault on Zimmerman let alone threaten him with serious bodily harm or even death.

Therefore Zimmerman had reason to believe he was in threat of serious bodiy harm and had the right to defend himself.

and no petulant racist remarks will change that!!!
The funny thing is, is that Zimmy is not a racist, but the overwhelming majority of his supporters are ‘ some of which say he could see through 100+ yards of darkness and identify Zimmy, even though all the witnesses agree it was too dark to see past 15 or 20 feet[/QUOTE]

 

"did some one use my name!!!!!!? I'm here> over here!!!!!!!!

 

well, when the zimmerman haters get called out and proven wrong they just disappear don't they.... LOL!

 

I wonder how these pro-Zimmy folks would think about some big guy with a violent criminal record stalking thier kid at night with a gun.

 

Violent criminal record? IZE GOTZ TO SEE PROOF OF THAT. But anyways, one would have no idea if someone has a "violent criminal" record because you dont advertise it on a sign or anything when you walk around. Let alone know they have a concealed pistol. what you talking bout wayne? Interesting you are liberal but have a conservative icon. Name should be "parody" maybe... good stuff.

 

Well there you go then one of those witnesses will say on the stand Oh yea I could see with perfect clarity through the darkness that knight…….. chuckle chuckle

 

I said he was a good stalker that means that it had not got to the point that it was chargeable as such, not that it wasn’t stalking. Do you believe that a killer can’t stalk there victim just once? The name Garry Ridgway comes to mind


You’re the one who questions the actions or lack off, of Tracy, but not once have you questioned Zimmies actions, so you must feel there is some relevance to these questions, and I’m asking you specifically what that is. The fact that you question Tracy and not Zimmy says a lot of you

 

[/QUOTE]

Funny the way you structure your sentence to make it sound as if zimmy was following the instructions of the NEN operator when in fact, when he was asked what direction Trayvon was headed he was able to answer without hesitation and he was never asked to keep an eye on Trayvon and when asked what Trayvon was doing he answered looking about as if that was somehow illegal, I mean the nerve of that little ******** using his eyes. I don’t give a two shxts what you would do any more than I expect you to care what I would do. Just because Zimmy said OK does not mean he complied, it’s foolish to say he did when he continued in the same direction and canceled the meeting location in favor of a phone call when they arrived


I don’t have a problem with him calling in Trayvon, but don’t jerk me around with the see what direction crap when he had already stated what direction, I’m not a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing idiot, and again with the first and second confrontation BS it was one long confrontation that has yet to conclude. Your statements will never hold up against the DA’s case and I highly doubt MOM will try and sell the chain of events in the manor you have outlined throughout these threads because it would be a guilty verdict for sure after the jury hears the DA’s spill, but hey stick with it to the end, see you in June

 

Certain threads have a proper place in this forum.

If a new event happens in this case, it can be placed in Current Events.

I have quoted here so members can find it.

Sincerely,

Jiyuu-Freedom
Site Moderator

 

On several of these threads I have posted a message in French to Margot. She claims to have gone to School in Switzerland and yet cannot understand a word it seems. She is clearly a liar. All schools in Switzerland have compulsory French.

 

Once again prove how under Florida law this was a stalking.

Prove it, prove that under Florida law it would have been a stalking.

And?

Martin's father actions are not subject to the criminal investigation or the guilt or innocence of Zimmerman.

My comments about his father were in response to another poster and yes I wonder why he let his son be unsupervised and why he did not take a more active role in finding out what happened to him that night, but it has no bearing on the trial or it's out come does it..

 

Sab.. My foreign language skills are poor and not natural to me.. I went to school in Lugano-Montagnola and they offered French, Italian and German..

BTW.. I was called little memsab growing up.

What is your d*amned problem?

 

Funny the way you structure your sentence to make it sound as if zimmy was following the instructions of the NEN operator when in fact, when he was asked what direction Trayvon was headed he was able to answer without hesitation and he was never asked to keep an eye on Trayvon..[/QUOTE]

911 dispatcher:

Let me know if he does anything, OK?

Suspicious.

And all that came AFTER Martin had run off and Zimmerman had no idea where he was and had not gone done between the buidlings where he had seen Martin run through. Zimmerman then turned to go back towards his truck, the direction from which he expected the police to be arriving any second.

If you believe otherwise then present the evidence that proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.

Factually incorrect, Martin even told the girl friend he had lost the guy who have been watching him.

You have yet to prove it. If the DA's case is based on the statements of the girl friend then that case will be that Martin ran off and ran back to the apartment where he was for several minutes, during which time he simply could have gone inside, sat down on the couch and watched the basketball game and be alive today. It was Martin who choose different. And quite frankly that is the ONLY case the DA has.

Present the evidence otherwise. The "manor" in which I outline it is according to the evidence at hand, not suppositions, not conjecture, the evidence of record. What do you have to refute it?

- - - Updated - - -

Isn't this about Law & Justice, I can't think of a more striking example.

 

911 dispatcher:

Let me know if he does anything, OK?



Suspicious.



And all that came AFTER Martin had run off and Zimmerman had no idea where he was and had not gone done between the buidlings where he had seen Martin run through. Zimmerman then turned to go back towards his truck, the direction from which he expected the police to be arriving any second.

If you believe otherwise then present the evidence that proves it beyond a reasonable doubt.




Factually incorrect, Martin even told the girl friend he had lost the guy who have been watching him.



You have yet to prove it. If the DA's case is based on the statements of the girl friend then that case will be that Martin ran off and ran back to the apartment where he was for several minutes, during which time he simply could have gone inside, sat down on the couch and watched the basketball game and be alive today. It was Martin who choose different. And quite frankly that is the ONLY case the DA has.


Present the evidence otherwise. The "manor" in which I outline it is according to the evidence at hand, not suppositions, not conjecture, the evidence of record. What do you have to refute it?

- - - Updated - - -



Isn't this about Law & Justice, I can't think of a more striking example.[/QUOTE]

On that we agree but for now I have the grandkids for the weekend so I will respond to the rest of your post latter, just so I don’t get accused of hit and miss posting as I have by other posters

 

I wonder more why so many are blindly claiming racism when we all know Martin attacked Zimmerman provking the attack.
No one deserves an award here, it was a tragic situation. But you cannot attack other people at will and expect no consequences.

 

yeah right -went to school in Switzerland and can;t speak French. You are busted

Memsahib you mean.

you are a liar

 

Considering all the evidence in the case, why is not the Zimmerman side suing the Martin side for damages. It is obvious to everyone that it is Zimmerman who has been wronged and is deserving of compensation.

 

He’ll get 20 years for his trouble

 

the disconnect from reality continues. the naacp called for a rally in sanford.....wtf?

 

I'd say that would be perfectly appropriate. He did volunteer work (and quite dangerous) for his community, got injured doing it, and now got railroaded into a murder charge by a pack of black racist lunatics. Plus he stopped a burglar and murderous thug (Trayvon Martin) from committing crimes.

(Note though that I don't support Lapierre because of his idiotic position on extended background checks.)

 

After the acquittal, he will probably do that, and there will be a list of defendants in addition to the Martin parents (Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, the New Black Panther loons, Spike Lee, Rosanne Barr, Florida Gov. Rick Scott (sue him personally, not the state), Chris Serino, Angela Corey,, and a few other assorted misfits).