Put your finger under each word and pronounce it aloud one word at a time. I believe you will be able to understand my two short sentences. If not, you may have a friend who can explain them to you.
Yes, you believe Donald Trump will go to jail. However, nothing in that speech mentions any violence. He could be encouraging 2A followers to petition Hillary once she wins, for all you know. What a pathetic and hilarious post. Still think he's going to jail? Been a few days now... LOL!
No, because the comments were like night and day. No relationship whatsoever. Biden could repeat that speech word for word today, and it would have no relationship with what Trump said. Biden said Obama wasn't taking his guns and for people not to listen to the propaganda of the Right. Trump on the other hand was calling on the second amendment crowd to stop Hillary if she gets her SC nominees. That is a "HUGE" difference. Biden and Trump are both talking about two very different things.
Fun with semantics. The meaning was clear to everyone who heard it - the comment was an irresponsible veiled threat and was reported as such by media including Fox News. Only Trump's most virulent supporters are having comprehension issues.
Remember that Trump's 'most virulent' supporters have swilled the Trump cool aide and have their tin foil hats jammed firmly down around their brains to stop any light from getting in.
Biden said he would actually shoot Obama or anyone who tried to take his guns. Who did Trump say he would shoot?
It is all a typical fabricated empty political charge. Amplified by typical fabricated CNN stories about Secret Service questioning. Yet another desperate credibility dump by the now frantic anti-Trump MSM.
The law requires you take the most reasonable explanation. That some one may infer something different is not your problem legally speaking.
"If Obama tries to fool with my Beretta he's got a problem". Are you seriously going to spread that fabrication you just typed where Biden said he would shoot Obama but didn't say that? Of course you are because lying is all you people started with, and now it's all you all have left.
The fact that anyone would even consider defending the crap that Trump said is, for my way of thinking, the most scary part of all of this. Trump is going where no decent candidate has ever gone before - by dogwhistling in no uncertain terms about using violence (read that as: assassination) to kill a presidential nominee from the opposing party. His use of "I dunno know" (which means that he full damned well knows), his body language while he said it and the direct reference to "2nd amendment people" - especially after we have heard from wild-assed basked cases like Ted Cruz about "2nd amendment solutions" (see: April 2015).... there is no doubt in the strange mix of the 10ther/Birther/2a/TeaParty crowd what "2nd amendment people" means. It means that those people will use the gun to try to kill someone whom they feel is a danger to their way of life. But when the one crazy-assed gal who works for him even admitted that it really was talk about assassination, only that he meant "could", not "should", well then, that cleared it up right away. Donald Trump is, by every measure, a fascist. He is the very opposite of what a Democracy needs to thrive. He will be defeated in a humilating landslide that will be the biggest landslide since Ronald Reagan's 1984 +18.22% margin win over hapless Walter Mondale. And he will have so badly tarnished the GOP among minorites, I doubt that the party will survive the damage he will have done.
I think Trump managed to be ambiguous enough that he can deny that it was a threat. As to people who think it was a joke, Donald Trump has no sense of humor, and I have never heard him make a genuine joke. A sarcastic comment perhaps, but no jokes. Nevertheless, the stupidity of his remark outrageous. Now, if some wingnut does make an attempt on another candidate's life, everyone except for the most fervent Trump fanatics will point the finger at him.
Well clearly Trump did not mean what he said. Or so he and his team would have us believe. But beyond that even,...they also want us to believe that he didn't even say what we all clearly heard...
Well said. Trump says things that you would expect from only the most despotic regimes: 1. Openly commits to using torture. 2. Says he would order the military to commit war crimes. 3. Encourages violence at his rallies. 4. Threatens the life of a political opponent. But you know what really shows how far over the edge he is? Despots won't make those comments in public. They may order war crimes and torture but they don't publicize it at rallies. They don't because they know to do so is objectionable and would result in their facing unpleasant consequences. Trump doesn't know that.
That annoys me also. They blame us for listening to the liberal media. I didn't need to listen to anyone but Donald himself to understand what he meant. It was blatantly obvious what he was hinting at.
And absolute disgusting fabrication that only the slimy CNN network can dig up from their own commode, and then they doubled down on the lie by stating that the Secret Service had a sit down with him..... When called out on the second Lie by Trump, Jim Sciutto of CNN and associates triple down with vagueness ..... And Robby Mook the Kook should go back to basic English interpretation, because ...... The above load of dung is NOT what Donald Trump implied at all, and a third grader could have figured that out.
It's in the eye of the beholder, this "veiled threat." This is more anti-Trump propaganda, more character assassination, and nothing more. It's all Team Hillary has.
I see. Now lets see the video! Joe Biden, in 2008: If Obama tries to fool with my Beretta, hes got a problem #2A #2ndAmendment I guarantee ya. Barack Obama aint takin my shotgun, so dont buy that malarkey, dont buy that malarkey. Theyre gonna start peddlin that deal. I got two, if he tries to fool with my Beretta hes got a problem. I like that little over and underyou know Im not bad with it. Gateway Pundit, VIDEO: Biden Threatens to Shoot Obama if He Tries to Take His Guns, By Kristinn Taylor Aug 10th, 2016. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/video-biden-threatens-shoot-obama-tries-take-guns/ Wake up.
Again, your exact words that you said Biden said were "he would shoot Obama". That's just a straight lie you are telling. Do you know who "They're" is? I saw the video several times. It's a straight up lie invented to mean something else by the Right wing. Sorry, but that is never going to fly and has absolutely no relationship whatsoever to Trumps proposal of the second amendment crowd to do something after the SC nominees are decided. You people have a long ways to go in understanding logical deductive reasoning. And this is a prime example. The link said one thing and the video said another. You can't get a better example of lying when you have two different quotes from the same link.
1. Our current administration actively tortures people. Hillary has made no plans to stop that. She is in favor of torture. 2. Hillary Clinton pressured for a Libyan intervention and Syria rebel arming. What do you think happened? A beautiful transition to a Democratic Libya? Nope. Mass rape, mass murder, and mass torture. All worth it apparently for reasons no one (*)(*)(*)(*)ing knows. 3. Funny, how 'encouraging' violence occurs when a person there to listen to someone is assaulted for being there. Yet Trump and his supporters are "violent" people yet, I never see Trump supporters going to Hillary rallies to flail their fists around, shoot guns at the venue, destroy public & private property, and chase down supporters. The only group encouraging violence are the PC-Police on campuses and the Left&Right wing establishment declaring Trump 'literally Hitler'. This gives the right for not on one occasion but, two for a possible assassination attempt on Trump. He is violent? Please. 4. Where did he actively say "Put a bullet in her head."?
So, being in the closet is OK ??? As long as you are a Secret Despot ? Hillary is another Hitler, she hates Jews and most everyone, expect another Holocaust if she gets into power.
wow, pry off that tin foil hat and let some air in. You're getting lost in delusion. Clinton is a career politician, unlike Trump, who is an amateur rich guy politician. Clinton may not be ideal, but she's hardly dangerous. The irony is that an experienced, moderate Republican could beat Clinton pretty easily, especially if he didn't have a lot of scandal baggage.