U.S. ratchets up China trade war, threatens tariffs on $200 billion of goods

Discussion in 'Latest US & World News' started by Canell, Jul 11, 2018.

  1. Canell

    Canell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    4,308
    Likes Received:
    1,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    To be continued... ;)
     
  2. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Welp, hope it doesn't happen. Another recession doesn't sound like fun to me.
     
    Moonglow and MissingMayor like this.
  3. Canell

    Canell Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2011
    Messages:
    4,308
    Likes Received:
    1,829
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why do think there would be a recession because of that?
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  4. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    We are destroying trade with well established markets. The industries can't adjust as fast as Trump can sign new tariffs so there will simply be a lot of waste.
     
    Durandal and yardmeat like this.
  5. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because trade wars are terrible for any economy and this will hurt a lot of businesses here in the US, even if China doesn't retaliate . . . which it will.

    I'd prefer we go back the the Constitutional way of doing things. There's a reason the Founding Fathers put tariffs in the hands of Congress instead of letting one man institute them on a whim.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
    Canell likes this.
  6. s002wjh

    s002wjh Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2011
    Messages:
    4,210
    Likes Received:
    641
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the problem is trump fighting a multi front trade war with our allies and china. because of that China are less likely to back off. even though china can't match $200B in tariff, but it can make US business operate in china a living hell while simultaneously make EU/Japan/Skorea business operation easier. Many US company such as apple/boeing/GM/Ford/Chevy just name few depend on china for growth revenue. Result is trump didn't help America company in China but help EU/Japan/ and others
     
  7. zalekbloom

    zalekbloom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2016
    Messages:
    3,723
    Likes Received:
    2,791
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
  8. Baff

    Baff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    9,641
    Likes Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Incorrect.
    So far China has reduced it's tariffs in response to Trumps threats.
    The only trade he is destroying is Chinese trade. And he is not so much "destroying it" as replacing it with US trade.
     
  9. Baff

    Baff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    9,641
    Likes Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    China has already backed off.
    He is trying to make them back off more.

    Everyone will back off vs America because America is the biggest market in the world with the lowest tariffs in the world.
    He holds the winning hand.
    Consequently when they threatened him with a trade war, to try and scare him off, he didn't blink.

    When you get a trade balance with your allies and China, they will not back off.
    You have a long way to go before this happens.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  10. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Where do you get your news from?
     
  11. Baff

    Baff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    9,641
    Likes Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Financial Times.
    I posted the link in the other thread.

    China dropped it's 25% car tariff to 15% on July the 1st.
    Having previously threatened to raise it by a further 25% in response to Trumps proposed tariff hikes.

    This is what everyone expected to happen and it has happened. Shocker.

    Here you go.
    https://www.ft.com/content/5e7d748a-5dec-11e8-9334-2218e7146b04
    Google is your friend.

    America has the winning hand. Trump has the balls to play it.
    Must be nice to have a smart president after all these years.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  12. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That lasted less then a week as Trump threatened tariffs immediately after. China just enacted more tariffs on cars.
     
  13. Baff

    Baff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    9,641
    Likes Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sorry can't find any news of that on Google.
    Sounds like Fake News.
    Are you sure they raised it as opposed to just threatened to raise it?
    Or did some one just say they might raise it and not even them?
    Perhaps they said they would raise it in the future?

    If it happened, I'd like to read about it.

    Anyway, can't find any evidence to support your claim from a cursory Google search.
    So I'll remain skeptical of it for now.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  14. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You can't be serious.
     
  15. Baff

    Baff Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2016
    Messages:
    9,641
    Likes Received:
    2,003
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Of course I am serious.

    Financial Times is a credible source. A randomly named Trump basher on the internet is not.
    I've taken the time to try and source your claims.
    More time than you took to source mine.

    I haven't been able to.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  16. therooster

    therooster Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2014
    Messages:
    13,004
    Likes Received:
    5,494
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lol... oh you guys ....
     
  17. Same Issues

    Same Issues Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2014
    Messages:
    1,561
    Likes Received:
    533
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Financial Times seems to be pay to read for the article you linked
    .
     
    MissingMayor likes this.
  18. Durandal

    Durandal Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    55,864
    Likes Received:
    27,392
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Everything I'm seeing indicates that China is in far rougher shape as a result of the new trade war than we are. So far.
     
  19. MissingMayor

    MissingMayor Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2018
    Messages:
    7,845
    Likes Received:
    5,495
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Clearly he is throwing his money away as he hasn't read any articles in the last month. :fishing:
     
  20. imishkin1931

    imishkin1931 Newly Registered

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2018
    Messages:
    45
    Likes Received:
    8
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    I think China is doing the right thing in responding to Trump's tariffs, in my opinion we need to re-establish our commitment to NAFTA, NATO, because with out them we can't reassure the majority of people who oppose the administrations tariffs. America will go back the progress we were making under the Obama Administration.
     
  21. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Raising tariffs doesn't magically replace one country's trade with another's. And tariffs on other countries, even when the target countries don't retaliate, hurts businesses in the country implementing the tariffs. You put a tariff on steel to try to help producers of steel in your country . . . which hurts consumers of steel in your country, and there are more businesses consuming steel than there are producing, so you are hurting more of your businesses than you are helping.
     
    ronv likes this.
  22. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If china wants to sell in America they have to buy an equal amount from us too
     
  23. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, they don't. And using government force to try to make that so, instead of letting people make their own business decisions for themselves, is economically destructive. Unilateral trade deficits aren't categorically bad. The assumption that they are is based on the assumption that imports are harmful and exports are good, all of which is based on the false assumption that trade is a zero-sum game. Take a look at Hong Kong some time. They got rich off with trade deficits because they were smart enough to know that it wasn't somehow magically harmful for them to import the raw materials that they needed. Trade "deficits" are not actual, literal, monetary deficits.
     
  24. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes they will or we will make our own stuff here again
     
  25. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    57,893
    Likes Received:
    31,848
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Isolationism is economically self-destructive. Sorry.
     
    ronv likes this.

Share This Page