The master of the hemisphere and it's allies continue to block democracy and development in Haiti and so many people ask why? In Haiti there are no vital raw materials so why do this? It's to prevent the "threat of a good example" which would become an "exporter of revolution" by demonstration. This is what US planners refer to as "ideological subversion" - a "cancer which must be cut out before it spreads". The "dominos" would fall and then the whole system of domination would collapse, but that's for another thread. [video=youtube_share;iwkz9u9T_7Q]http://youtu.be/iwkz9u9T_7Q[/video] In a 2008 US embassy cable, former US Ambassador to Haiti Janet Sanderson emphasizes that: At a high-level meeting on August 2, 2006, top US and UN officials declared: The cabel described how former Guatemalan diplomat Edmond Mulet, then chief of MINUSTAH: At Mulet’s request, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan urged South Africa’s President Thabo Mbeki: President Obama and Kofi Annan’s successor, Ban Ki-moon, also intervened to urge Pretoria to keep Aristide in South Africa. The secret cables report that Aristide’s return to Haiti would be a “disaster,” according to the Vatican, and “catastrophic,” according to the French. But the regional and Haitian view was quite different. US Ambassador James Foley admitted in a confidential March 22, 2005, cable that an August 2004 poll:
Many people expressed their sympathy for the victims of the earthquake but they remain silent for the victims of the West. Samuel Huntington's analysis of American political culture seems apt:
