Virginians Shout ‘Let’s Go Brandon’ and Display ‘Build Crack Better’ Sign as Joe Biden Visits Culpep

Because of media distortion and bias.

 

You literally did this post with a straight face after this has been on the web for about 2 years?

 

We don’t need the dossier, we have the senate report, the fbi report, the indictment of the hackers,

 

I would find it a help, if you could explain the points you are making, here. Your top paragraph seems to translate as, "Because top Democratic leaders are (purported by you to be, but yet accepted by me, for the sake of argument) fans of Antifa and BLM," that justifies your using this as a, "blanket smear," of Democrats, at large. Was that your meaning? If so, I'll point out that, "Because they are," is really not an answer to my question, relating to how supposed allegiances of some unnamed, Democratic leaders, translates as a reflection of the attitudes, actions, and implied values, of Democrats, in general.

The reason for my question, recall, was due to your trying to paint some equivalence between run of the mill, Democratic-aligned CITIZENS, and these protesters, who are the subject of your thread's lauds. And your answer is, because some top Dems, love ANTIFA & BLM? This would be an illogical, non sequitur response, if it is an accurate reflection of your argument.

You see, it is the anti-Biden protesters, who are the subject of your thread. Appropriately, then, my initial comment was 100% about these protesters (which I make in an obviously facetious tone, that should be clear just from reading it and, to which, you'd caught on). Then, your reply is: Well, some Dem leaders love ANTIFA, so Democrats, throughout the public, are no different.

This makes no sense.

I would be happy, if you could at least clear up any confusion I have, about just that small part of your argument. So I will consider my query about the other, of your quoted statements, as just a optional part of this post, regarding my expectations of your reply. We can address that, separately. But, if you feel that your response nails the 1st half, then by all means, proceed to explain what these other words of yours, are supposed to mean:

"I sincerely hope you(r) Guage for what's good or bad is not based on where the complaints come from."

I think your giving of an example, might go a long way towards clarifying the thought which you were expressing.

 

False equivalence. I am not asking about what actions of the past, any individuals have taken. Instead, at this point in my conversation w/ @US Conservative -- with which your familiarity, could only aid your chances of offering relevant additions-- I am asking about his and other "Conservatives'," or Right-Wingers', or whatever label one wishes to use (I think we all know, to whom I refer), continuing to generate threads, championing the "Brandon" crowd, as if they they were warriors in a Holy War.

If you cannot show examples of posters on the Left, falling over themselves, in their gushings over how wonderful it was, that BLM protesters set buildings ablaze, then your supposed argument, above, is completely off-topic.

I am looping you, Starcastle, into my attempt to get Bearack up to speed, in the conversation, which you, also, do not seem to have been following. Hopefully, my explanation to Bearack, above, you will also find helpful.

 

Bidens policies are for hard drug addiction of.minorities.

 

Whatever you are talking about, might be something interesting, and worth discussing, so l will certainly leave open the possibility of coming back to this, with you, once I understand your point.

To the post of mine, for which your argument above is part of your reply, your words do not seem to have anything to do with my position, argument, or stated point of view. To assist in your getting a wider sense of the context of my remarks, which it appears that you may have misinterpreted, here are, listed sequentially, my first 3 posts (ending with the one, to which, you offered your quote, at top):

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...n-visits-culpep.596943/page-3#post-1073253116


http://www.politicalforum.com/index...n-visits-culpep.596943/page-3#post-1073253158


http://www.politicalforum.com/index...n-visits-culpep.596943/page-3#post-1073253190

 

Defiling oneself with vulgarity and immaturity sinks nothing but ones own ship. To whom is that a victory? It does not represent the Republican party, civil discourse, or the American spirit. It is merely an accompaniment to the decay which has enveloped our nation.

 

Should be noted that rumor started with Hilary Clinton in the primary.

 

So post a quote of her ever mentioning it

 

She did not, however a Philip Berg, a Hilary Clinton supporter is credited with first bringing it up as a smear during the primaries

 

And once he released his birth certificate in 07 it was a done deal to dems.

 

I did long ago on this site, MANY MANY Times

 

You can trace the start of it to the 60 min interview where she suggests it

Her is some tidbits
7 News Stories from 2008 that PROVE Hillary Started Obama 'Birtherism' - Media is LYING! (thepoliticalinsider.com)

The DNC are some ruthless folks and lucky for them their base is easily swayed from facts LOLOLOL

 

So all you got is to keep repeating the lie that taxpayer money was not used to buy crack pipes and then jump to the usual, a strawman fallacy about obama. You post your lie directly following a post/link documenting the crack pipes. I myself have posted two links documenting the buying of crack pipes and posted pictures. The liberal Snopes has documented the buying of crack pipes. Face the facts. The Biden administration used taxpayer money to buy crack pipes.

 

None of those are her saying he was born some place else. Trump kept it going after 2 birth certificates lol
When do we hear from those investigators he sent to Hawaii?

 

Complete BS. And do you think crack is the only drug people smoke?

 

Like I said The question is where the birther nonsense started, and that would be Hillary. NOW if you think her staffer did ANY THING without her approval you would be sadly mistaken or practicing some sort of mental blocking or self-hypnosis

 

No you didn’t one doesn’t exist

 

I do think staff is capable of independent though. Or we can we assume the same of trumps staff? Yah I didn’t think so.

 

I believe once the morons discovered the "Cat was out of the GOODIE BAG" they went full damage control and began ************ their audience by simply claiming a mistake was made in the WORDING..

That generally puts the minds of the true believer to rest, truth or lies

 

And you don't really know Hillary Clinton then, in which case DQ you from anything you might be assuming she said or didn't say

 

LMAO I realize you take comfort in believing that, so lets just leave it at that

Here's the pic Hillary campaign floated around while claiming he wasn't a citizen and a Muslim

 

You can always prove she was behind it.
Oh wait, you can’t.
Either way no dem mentioned it once the BC came out. Not the same for the delusional right. Including many on this forum who still like to pretend we should take them seriously.

 

You want me to ask again? Post a quote of her mentioning it.
You can’t.