Voters say they’re worse off after four years of Obama, so why is Romney struggling?

Why? Because the US is controlled by the Feds. They control the media and election machine. They select the politicians to control the government. That's why even Clinton did a good job in his last term, Bush won the election. What the Feds needed was not a good economy, they need war and the Patriot Act. Several month after his election, 911 happened which satisfied what the Feds needed.

This time, Obama will give the Feds something Romney can't give. So you saw Romney is under the fire of media despite the life of Americans is worse off after four years reign of Obama.

 

Who is "the feds"? Normally that refers to the federal reserve, but they get replaced by the president, not the other way around...

 

Naw, it's because he comes off like those fratboy dicks in Revenge of the Nerds. Just a gut reaction.

 

Why? I will put it to you bluntly: because Romney is Obama's turd so to speak.
and turd of a turd makes the original turd shine.

 

The Feds are D.O.D. (Pentagon) and D.O.J. (FBI and DEA).

 

I'm glad to have answered your question.

 

If most people believe US is on wrong tracks, why do they still support Obama. That's Obama's track. But when the Feds need Obama, they would manipulate the media to convince people Obama will win, no matter how senseless it is.

 

Oh, I see, its the evil "feds". are they related to the illuminatti or the NWO?

Romney is now leading by a small margin. The media created image of him was shattered in the debate and will be further shattered in the next one. Plus, the people will see the real obama in a non scripted debate.

This could be a romney landslide.

 

Because they also remember that they were also much worse off after the term of President Bush?

 

QE3 released in September is apparently a tactic to favor Obama’s campaign. The real estate business will booming. Riches will have their assets price increased. What poor people get will be high price for gas and food and house. The inflation is at sight.

 

Haha. Want a more simple and honest answer?

Because countries and economies have momentum. America was diving like a bowling ball dropped from a 10 story building under Bush/Romney policies. Obama took office and kept the ball from hitting the ground. Sure, we are worse off than we were 4 years ago. But no president can wave a magical wand and fix everything on day six (day six of Obama's administration Fox news started attacking him because he hadn't made enough progress fixing America). So when the answer is, "No, we are worse" it's because of the statistical numbers which dove hard but steadied out after 2 years of Obama. If people say we are better off its because we aren't diving like we were.

Here is a better question. Is our current President talking about an oncoming depression or is he talking about continuing the recovery of the nation? I remember when Bush left office http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aEh1ODkdn14

Why would we vote for someone with the exact same plan as Bush but with less detail? Why would we vote someone that can't address the American people and tell them we will not go to unnecessary war when the past few Republicans have been war mongers and we are still in war today because of them?

 

The real reason is the Feds need Obama's new Health care reform. There is nothing they care if people can benefit from it or not. They just want it to frame a target in their case with which they have created OKC bombing, 911 attack to get the Patriot Act.

You can see it from the surprise turn around of the Chief Justice Roberts.

726. The surprise turnaround of Chief Justice (7/4/2012)

On 6/28, Supreme Court issued a pass for Obama's Health care policy. What surprised people was Chief Justice Roberts sided with four liberal justices in voting 5-4 to declare the law's "individual mandate" constitutional.


Why did John Roberts, a Bush appointee who generally votes with his conservative colleagues, suddenly change his opinion to vote with the liberal? Just three months ago, he still opposed that "individual mandate" law.

There are different theories about this mysterious turnaround. Mostly were from disinformation office of the Feds to cover up their puppet Roberts. None could solve the puzzle. I know why - the Feds want that "individual mandate" provision. When the Feds want to put Kat Sung under surveillance, they forced the law makers passing through the Patriot Act. (Through OKC bombing and 911 bombing) When the Feds want to restrict Kat Sung in US, they activate the TSA search, (blocking leaving from air flight) blocking the entering of Canada and Mexico; (by "Operation Fast and Furious") see "697. TSA search, Canada and Mexico (12/11/2011)". Now when they want Kat Sung to have a health insurance, they activate their proxy- John Roberts.

Six years ago when Roberts was selected as Chief Justice, I have written already,
"344. Roberts, a secret agent of D.O.J. (9/18/05)"

http://katsung47.yuku.com/topic/4/The-dark-side-of-the-USA?page=4

This case proves I was very, very accurate at that judgement.

I'll talk about why the Feds want that "individual mandate" provision.

 

No one's told you the reality yet.

The reality is that those who do not vote know that both parties are worthless and truly fear for the indebted and enslaved nation those parties have formed. Therefore we yell and scream outside of the fence that they are all in prison and the guards are vampires, but those inside of the fence continue to vote for the other guard to takeover their cell block.

 

It's because the Democrats have painted Romney as being so rich he is out of touch with the average American. Also because Romney has no hope of getting 10% of the Black vote, or 20% of the Hispanic vote, expecting him to make all those illegals citizens. Then you have the Democrats who will vote Democratic no matter who runs and those others that think Obama will do better in his second term, even though they should know his policies will only make things worse.

 

Well he has said what he will do if reelected. Make 12 million illegals, citizens and put the coal industry out of business. You think this will make things better?

 

He isn't "out of touch" with the average American?? Sounds accurate enough to me.

 

You mean like the coal plant PinkSlip proudly shut down while getting PR with him standing in front of it? The 12 million used for slave labor by the super wealthy, you must mean.

 

742. Help Obama to win the second term (10/24/2012)

The recent Gallup poll shows that Mitt Romney leads over President Barack Obama in president Campaign. That’s just a gimmick to cheat people. The election result is pre-decided. Obama will stay for his second term. It doesn’t relate to any politics. It is for a case of the Feds. They need Obama’s Health Reform that they forced Chief Justice Roberts to change his mind in June to pass the “Health Reform”. (see “ 726. The surprise turnaround of Chief Justice (7/4/2012)&#8221

To keep Obama to stay in his seat, they have to create an economic background that favors him. Two months before voting date, in early September, we saw European bank chief Draghi said the bank would buy the bond with no limit. How could this affect US president election?

Within days, Federal Reserve Chief Bernanke pushed out another QE which would push up economy temporarily but hurt it in long term with inflation. The Republicans felt it immediately. The timing of issuing QE3 is not a coincidence. It helps Obama.

QE3 will create another housing bubble.

Faber sees the Fed's monetary policies over the last 15 years as mainly responsible for the various asset bubbles (Nasdaq, real estate etc...), the Nasdaq bubble is the dot.com bubble, I talked about these two bubbles from #733 to #739. And the Federal Reserve now continues to create the third one. At the purpose to help the Feds to remove the hot potatoes in their hands to the ordinary people.

 

742. Help Obama to win the second term (10/24/2012)

The recent Gallup poll shows that Mitt Romney leads over President Barack Obama in president Campaign. That’s just a gimmick to cheat people. The election result is pre-decided. Obama will stay for his second term. It doesn’t relate to any politics. It is for a case of the Feds. They need Obama’s Health Reform that they forced Chief Justice Roberts to change his mind in June to pass the “Health Reform”. (see “ 726. The surprise turnaround of Chief Justice (7/4/2012)”)

To keep Obama to stay in his seat, they have to create an economic background that favors him. Two months before voting date, in early September, we saw European bank chief Draghi said the bank would buy the bond with no limit. How could this affect US president election?

Within days, Federal Reserve Chief Bernanke pushed out another QE which would push up economy temporarily but hurt it in long term with inflation. The Republicans felt it immediately. The timing of issuing QE3 is not a coincidence. It helps Obama.

QE3 will create another housing bubble.

Faber sees the Fed's monetary policies over the last 15 years as mainly responsible for the various asset bubbles (Nasdaq, real estate etc...), the Nasdaq bubble is the dot.com bubble, I talked about these two bubbles from #733 to #739. And the Federal Reserve now continues to create the third one. At the purpose to help the Feds to remove the hot potatoes in their hands to the ordinary people.

 

So. . .you really think that if voters had been asked whether they would prefer to have another major war to increase their financial well being, or see the economy improve slowly but surely, while ENDING the costly wars (both in terms of American life and economics), they would say they would prefer more wars?

If you do. . . what planet do you live in?

In fact, a MINORITY of people feel they are worse off now than 4 years ago. If you look at people who state they are BETTER off and people say they are ABOUT THE SAME, and add those two together. . . the total is MUCH higher than those who say they are "worse off!" And this is ALSO true among INDEPENDENTS!

And please note that this poll was conducted 2 months ago. . .and economy has continued to improve (although slowly) over the last 2 months!

 

Link please?

You keep on making those outrageous statement, and NEVER post a reliable link.
IF President Obama is reelected, he did say he would continue to push for the Dream Act and to allow children born here from non-documented aliens to retain their citizenship and all their rights.
And he said that he would DEVELOP EVERY POSSIBLE avenues toward energy independence from foreign nations, while putting an emphasis on CLEAN ENERGY (including CLEAN COAL energy).

Now. . .show me otherwise or shut up!

 

I'm afraid it's not. It's a hoax.

743. Create a hoax of a better off economy (10/29/2012)

Three months before the voting date, the unemployment rate was still high that it made the re-election unlikely for Obama.

It’s hard to convince people the unemployment rate would drop below 7.2% in two months from 8.3%. But they still could manage to get a figure of 7.8% in order to make Obama’s re-election more reasonable.

Nobody can verify the figure. It’s all under their control. They could cover up the truth of 911 attack. They could make Bin Laden died twice. So what to maintain a puppet president? If they could have kept a war criminal (who activated a war with a lie) to stay on his second term, what’s the problem for another puppet? All they have to do is to create a hoax of a better off economy for several months then blame everything on the coming financial cliff.

 

744. Manipulation in Mother Nature’s guise (11/7/2012)

The Feds like to play the God’s role to control people. In 2004, when they planned to keep a proved liar on chair for his second term, they said it was the “God’s will”.
Pat Robertson predicted "I think George Bush is going to win in a walk, I really believe I'm hearing from the Lord it's going to be like a blowout election in 2004. It's shaping up that way."
Eight years later, the Feds want to shape up the way for Obama. They play the God’s will in another way – in Mother Nature’s guise.

If you still remember how storm Issac had disturbed the GOP Convention and suppressed Republican’s spirit.

It was so coincident that Limbaugh alleged:

Then another coincidence came:

745. Manipulation the election (11/12/2012)

Watch the date of the announcement. The day next to the election day. Big lay off took some time to plan. Boeing is a big firm that under the control of the Feds. They don’t want to hurt Obama’s campaign so they sealed the bad news until he is re-elected. Same tactic was seen in other areas.

Unemployment generally correlates with food-stamp enrollment. The Feds made it a sharp drop two months before the election day from 8.3% to 7.8%. I alleged the figure was rigged(see #743). It’s a big conflict to the Food Stamp Enrollment data. How the sharp drop of unemployment could cause a record high food stamp enrollment? To prevent the contradiction to hurt Obama’s election, we saw an unusual delay of Food stamp enrollment data releasing.

http://www.debatepolitics.com/attac...s-reach-record-47-1-million-foodstamps912.jpg

 

746. GOP is obedient to the Feds (11/21/2012)

So far, the death toll in Syria is about 30,000, much less than 60,000. The media and US politicians beat the drum on civilians’ death there but keep a blind eye on its neighbor Mexico. Are the lives of the Muslim more valuable than Mexicans? No, it’s because this topic would certain to draw out a scandal – Operation Fast and Furious. It’s an Achilles’ heel of the Obama’s administration. Why the GOP and Romney hadn’t taken the advantage on this issue in election campaign? Because it’s the Feds that control this nation and the election. Eric Holder and D.O.J. committed the crime to supply the weapons to Mexican drug gangs and made Mexico a slaughtering field. The republican dares not to offend its master. So the issue was left alone.

The cause that leads the Feds to keep Obama on his chair is they need his Healthcare for their case. (see “726. The surprise turnaround of Chief Justice (7/4/2012)”. Obama is the rare President who could be re-elected when unemployment was above 7.4%. After the failure, the Republican recognizes the intention of the Feds and bows down: