Was the Marathon Bombing REAL ???

Using loudspeakers to tell everyone "its a drill" right before a few bombs explode, is quite different than just maintaining a presence.

And if they're going to profit off the ratings from this event, they damn well better provide proof.

Its not about my edification.

Edification isn't even the correct word you were looking for. Hit up a dictionary some time.

 

Right because that really happened. For real. Because it did.

You mean like you just did when you didn't know what edification meant? You still don't.

 

You clearly meant to say Gratification.

To edify is to raise up in praise.

Im not trying to raise myself above anyone by requesting tangible proof these events are happening exactly as they are being reported.

 

So this is how conspiracy theorists get there rocks off? This question was actually asked? Wow that's powerful illogical. Next they'll claim that the two bombers aren't real....

 

The city of Boston was locked down, and to search for one guy? There's more going on that hasn't been reported, and who knows, they could have been invaded by little gray aliens, but who would believe that even if it was true? But, what I saw on the television yesterday, total military police state in Boston, that is infinitely more dangerous to American society than some punk with a pressure cooker bomb.

 

Nope. You still don't know what it means. Let me enlighten you.

I used edification because that's what I meant. The root of edify means to build. That's why edifice means building. Edify means to build a value like morality, spirituality, or intelligence through instruction. In your case, I called the act twisted, inferring that the purpose was to benefit a false morality, spirituality, or intelligence.

Plainly stated, I was saying that you demand to be shown those gruesome images for the benefit of your already screwed up sensibilities. There's no benefit in that for anyone else, let alone the poor people that have suffered due to the attack.

 

Who killed and injured nearly 200 people. We had a manhunt over a guy who killed a cop elsewhere only weeks ago. And it was more exciting than the OJ 20 mile an hour car chase.

And you know this why?

Yes, what you are saying is just as likely as them being taken over by little gray aliens, so ite RATIONAL to be skeptical unless evidence is presented. Since you havent prevented anything other than stupid questions based on total ignorance, the chances of you being right is precisely zero

I'm sure you would have no problem sanding next to a pressure cooker bomb in that case.

Hell lets have an experiment to prove what you say, Lets see what kind of damage a pressure cooker bomb does to American society and compare it with a manhunt. Oh gosh, what do you know, we already had that experiment, and hundreds of crippled people actually damages society. I'm sorry that your attempt to minimize a bomb that injured 200 odd people has failed .Who knew that a pressure cooker bomb doesn't just generate a mild breeze and a bit of sunburn. That's why the were and are widely used in Iraq where they were known to disable AFVs.

 

I don't know what you mean by that, "attempt to minimize a bomb". If anything, I'm all for hyping it up because of the "what if". What if it was a nuke? What if it was a deadly biological or chemical attack? I think that Janet Napolitano failed, and I expect her to resign, she's clearly too incompetent for the job.

As far as conducting an experiment goes, that's what pisses me off about this thing. I study symbols and symbolism. I'm looking at the map of Boston, and considering the date and location of the bombing. Do you know what is called historicism? It's like, try searching something called "Hopi Prophecy Rock", look at the images, do you see a marathon in that? It's really a lot like these terrorists wanted to get my attention, maybe not me specifically as I'm not so narcissistic, but those bombs were designed to cause more psychological and sociological damage than physical, imo. How is that minimizing things?

 

Just to underscore the stupidity of demanding gruesome photos be broadcast publicly for your own personal study of the event, you claimed:

First of all, you can't even get the damned alternate theory right. You meant Nick Vogt. At least, that's the name your confederate theorists are crowing about.

Second of all, this is clearly an instance in which you got to see the gruesome photo and you still deny it.

Let's look at this line of thinking critically. Jeff Bauman was entered in the Boston marathon. That means Jeff Bauman qualified for the Boston marathon. He must have run his qualifying race with two legs. He must have registered to race on that day with two legs. People must have seen him running the race with two legs. The bomb then removed his two legs. Medics on the scene must have treated his injuries. People at the scene must have watched him get treatment. Doctors at Boston Medical Center must have operated on him. Nurses at Boston Medical Center must have treated him. He was visited by many people who regard him as a hero including his girlfriend, (who he was waiting for) and his family members who would know whether he had two legs before the race or not. Seems to me that there's a very large sample of people that can confirm whether Jeff Bauman was injured at the Boston marathon.

How many people has our local internet detective interviewed? My guess is zero since he can't even get the name of his supposed actor right.

 

I may have messed up the first name. But I did see a Facebook image on a video, saying it was john. OK, the CIA may have altered that bit halfway through the story unfolding.

And guess what. There are never going to be eyewitness testimonials of the medical personel, because it would violate confidentiality laws. Clever loophole there, huh?

And now Mr bomber #2 CONVENIENTLY will never speak again. Hmmmmmm.

Funny how the govt refused to officially charge him, or read him his Miranda rights.

Don't count on it happening, either. He's on his way to GITMO, no trial, no nothing.

Yet I still have yet to see video footage of any person being struck by explosive debris.

At all.

 

So is any event ever going to occur that you don't blame on the government or NWO?

 

Of this magnitude? No.

 

It's irrational and illogical to believe that.

 

This has got to be a comedy routine. You screwed up, got the guy's name wrong and you blame the CIA? Really? You're trying to tell me the CIA hired an ex military guy to play the part of someone else and then somehow changed the actor's name on a Facebook post? Man, some people jump through some seriously stupid hoops to avoid admitting a mistake.

Yeah, that's why a photo leaked out of the morgue. Hyyppa, right? Because everyone obeys all laws and everyone is so intimidated by the government they would never speak out if they saw something wrong...except for you. Because you're special, right?

Wrong.

Wrong.

Wrong.

Look at all these things you got wrong. Did the CIA do that too?

And you've still not stated any legitimate case why you should see such a thing.

 

False flaggots really can't be reasoned with.

 

Child like fools that accept everything the MSM/CIA ministry of psych warfare tells them to be true, don't really matter to those with critical thinking skills.

 

http://www.informationliberation.com/?id=8339

 

I don't mind being kept waiting, but this is ridiculous! I coulda been banned in the time you were away!! lol

 

It is called Brain Washing.

 

Was it all even filmed there ? As with 9/11 'film sets' were used for some scenes.

- - - Updated - - -

There are some vicSims making an awful lot of money out of it though.

 

I may be wrong but I thought the Military could not be used against civilians ...................Oh 'Terrorists' are not civilians eh ?

As a side note, they say the Army was out in force at Thatchers funeral too

 

I doubt he exists. It is the eyes they give these 'Terrorists', they are not real eyes, they are not real people.

 

Ahhhhh but who is the Government ? Not the puppet Prez or PMs that's for sure.

Who rules the Insidious Empire ? You tell us.

 

People do carry out bad events. If you're incapable of thinking that not everything is the fault of the NWO, then there is no point conversing with you as you are blinded by an obsession and incapable of thinking rationally.

 

I know perfectly well that people do 'bad things'.I lived through over twenty years with the constant threat of IRA bombs, you really don't need to tell anyone who lived in Britain through those times about bombs.

Those were not bombs in Boston, they were 'firecrackers' and smoke.