White liberals present themselves as less competent in interactions with AAs

So Yale researchers discovered that:

https://insights.som.yale.edu/insig...petent-in-interactions-with-african-americans

As some of us have noted for a very long time, liberals have an inherent racism that presumes they should dumb down their language when speaking to black people, or change their affectations to "sound more black". Liberal politicians pander to black audiences, and talk to them like they are children.

Whenever you see cringe-worthy video clips of white politicians using some ebonics hybrid when speaking to black crowds, they are always democrats. I assert this is overt racism, muffled in the blanket of inclusion. What say you?

 

White liberals present themselves as less competent in interactions with AAs

Like hell I do..

 

Relevant:

 

It bears noting, this was the same reaction the participants had. It's in there deep.

 

Ironic that a study based on bias appears to have its own bias ---- the assumption that liberals are "less biased" and "more well-intentioned", which is an arguably flawed premise, and certainly a biased one.

Meanwhile, who doesn't love a condescending and patronizing liberal with a racial bias

 

I'm amazed anyone would dispute this reality. White liberals are extremely racist and believe they are superior so of course they would think they have to "talk down" to people they already believe they are above but need for votes.

When you believe entire races of people are inferior to you of course you are going to believe they are less responsible and need more help to get ahead. This is the fundamental difference between liberal and conservative thinking. Conservatives do not believe identifying your race empowers or victimizes you and liberals do.

 

Well we know how they the like to play victim. Just sayin.

 

This hidden racism by liberals shouldn't surprise anyone, they're the ones who call themselves highly educated and the intellectual elite all while dumbing down or eliminating exit exams, and we all know who they're dumbing them down for, they pretty much admitted who they thought couldn't pass them when they called the tests racist.

Researchers found that minority students -- African-Americans, Hispanics and Asians -- earned lower scores on the exam than white students who had the same level of prior and current academic achievement. They also found that girls earned lower scores on the math section than boys who had the same level of prior and current academic achievement.
............
"If exit exam policies like California's are to be retained it is imperative that they be accompanied by serious efforts to ameliorate their negative effects on minority students and girls," the researchers wrote.

https://www.paloaltoonline.com/news/2009/04/22/stanford-study-criticizes-high-school-exit-exam

 

I thought this was kind of funny

I'm curious as to how many they Could find.

Still though, a good study that Dems and 'White Liberals' should pay attention to.

 

I don't feel noways tired.

 

Probably, not many.

When a Political Party is led by Donald Trump (an Avowed MISOGYNIST RACIST), and because of Trump's Ascendency that Party has become a "Big Tent" that happily welcomes the votes of Racists, Neo-Nazis, and White Supremacists--It is inevitable that speeches made in front of an AA audience would be virtually non-existent.

No surprise there.

 

Bruthas? Are you trying to prove my point? Lol

 

Looks like I proved mine. Let me know when you finally can get a brutha or sista that actually thinks of you as a friend. LMAO.

 

Lol I have no idea what you’re babbling about or how it’s related to the topic.

 

lol... you win this one.

 

When you catch them on how they really feel... it's sad... and funny... and revealing.

 

Because the right doesn't typically pander to blacks. We think its demeaning. We are all Americans. Speech shouldn't target any ethnicity, but values we all share.

 

Naturally your forgot what you said. Plus as we all know.....the NEA did say there was that problem with reading at grade level with that public education.

 

Except that this isn't about where the 'speech' is directed. It's about going to a place that happens to be full of minorities and making a speech, because it's part of your electoral area.

So why aren't Republicans going to these areas as either candidate or incumbent?

 

I said what the article said lol
Which had nothing to do with if you or I have any black friends lol

 

The civil rights movement was about equality, and the idea of 'black speeches' vs 'white speeches' is the exact opposite of that idea. A truly post-racial person or post-racial party would not speak or act differently depending on the race of the person they were talking to.

 

yeah right, what do black people have to lose voting for Trump... does the right think black people are that stupid

Trump supporters vote for captain bone spur, that attacks war heroes and gold star families, the press, and talks about fighting for freedom?

 

Maybe, we need another study?

The current "stagecraft white paper on best practices" treated as a religious text througout the MSM, commands: no editor, producer, reporter or photographer shall never record, or cause to be recorded, an event that might show any minorities expressing support for conservative candidates. See 'Token' exception to this rule.

Perhaps they Couldn't Find many because they aren't covered by MSM.

 

Its cute you made up a reason trying so desperately to run from the reality of what the study revealed.

They are but decades on your liberal plantation doesn't break down overnight.

 

Why would you need to look to the MSM when you can simply look at the Candidates/Elected Members schedules and/or press releases?

For example
Scott Walker
https://www.scottwalker.com/
at the bottom under 'Latest News', shows all his different electioneering efforts in various places.

Also, by it's size, Fox News is MSM. You think they wouldn't cover such things?