I don't know who wrote that but so what? First, I already talked about the word "control", but even if it's true that there are a lot of Jewish people in showbiz, why is this a problem? There are a lot of white Christians in country music (I'm guessing)...so what? Good for them. The way people are expressing this sounds exactly the same as the Nazi website...one of fear and hatred and bigotry.
No ! Not by any stretch.Jews have been on board,like Totally, fer sure,with the Democrat party for decades. Anyone doubting that is just EITHER shills for the Democrat party or purposedly given to panultimate societal peer pressure. There is no longer any debate about this.It's Manifest and out in the open now.Like a bad wound,
I find it stunning that there are adults in the world who believe that "races" do anything at all to other "races" or that "races" treat other "races" a certain way other than in very specific and blessedly few instances of genocide and the like. These seem to be the same types who believe that a 52-48 vote in a state makes it "red" or "blue" in some material way. Human history is mostly elites of all races and ethnicities ruling non-elites of all races and ethnicities... as a matter of plain fact. Prejudices and bigotry against "new" or "different" people are part and parcel of that, not the other way around. The gift of the Constitutional Republic and our Bill of Rights has changed that... for now, until and unless identity politics, the truly nefarious "ism," wins out over the rule of law.
I sincerely doubt other races will be willing to bankrupt their countries, change their language, change their education systems, and tolerate non-stop dysfunction and violence from white people while trying to accept them as equals.
I don't know of any "race" or nationality for that matter that is willing to do that. But I do understand that one aspect of bigotry is what I like to call paranoid exaggeration, where the issue/problem's actual impact is exaggerated by at least a factor of a gazillion in order to justify a position that has as much to do with the individuals psychology and sense of self worth than it does with any real threat.
Except whites, of course. That's funny considering how you were just lamenting the treatment of minorities by whites, implying that minorities would never do the same to whites in return.
The difference between white, Christian controlled country music (which I never listen to) and MSM (that is all around us) is that MSM shapes the opinions of billions around the world with just one bias perspective. As I've said before, I don't care who controls MSM but I always assume that with every story comes the bias of the storyteller.
missed the point it seems. not surprising since you are so ethnocentric. Er, you mean conquer the white people by force? you mean rape the white people of their dignity as well as their resources and labor? Funny how you are so afraid of non-white retribution. They'd do it to us because we did it to them. thank you for that helpful insight into white nationalist thinking.
I was responding to your point. Yes, they would do, and have done, those things to whites. Bam, there it is. The "noble savage theory" that white liberals apply to non-whites. In their narrative, non-whites are good, moral people who would never perpetuate the evils that white people have done. The only way they ever would is if they were responding to the aggression put forth by their evil white oppressors.
said response missing it completely. Yes they have, of course for no other reason than being white. Like the MauMau's in Kenya. Killing white people because JUST because they were white. You sure as hell don't want to get into a discussion about the history of racial interactions. Us white boys would not be looking good. Who said anything about "noble savage". In fact the term "savage" used in this context is about as condescendingly bigoted as one can get. And NOBODY is denying that PEOPLE of all colors and creeds have been nasty "eeeevillllle doooooers" against all other colors and creeds at some point. But I can totally understand the need to strip all nuance and balance from the library of bumperstickers that racists are almost wholly intellectually dependent on.
Which groups would be looking good? I didn't create it. No surprise you never heard of it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_savage You said that the treatment whites could expect from minorities in charge is the result of how whites treated them, first. This implies that minorities would not treat whites in that way had they not been treated badly by them.
Pretty much all of them are extinct by now. Whats the meaning of savage again? thanks for the reference. I was unaware of exactly how extensive its use over time.. Well considering history we will never know for sure. OTOH, history and human nature informs us that tribalism remains a dominant social factor. I stan
So obviously it wasn't very beneficial for their survival. I think that's an ironic admission, coming from someone who wants whites to "act good" while other groups take their lands. I didn't create the term. The page explains what this literary character is, and how it is applied. I think many well-off white leftists who seek to "make a positive difference" in their later years subconsciously treat non-whites in this way. I suspect many of them despise this type of arrogant condescension. I know I would. We don't need to wonder too much about it. All human races have acted this way since the beginning. The left, though, only focuses on what whites did because they are at war with whites, their nations, and their civilizations.
they're afixin' to take our lands? I get that melodrama really helps communicate the underlying already absurd paranoia but seriously? You mean like many well off white rightists who seek to make a positive difference subconciously treat non-whites like evil leeches? I suspect you might be right. Ya know this idiotic "leftists at war with whites" batcrap bumpersticker you are trying to foist off is even stupider than the whole war on christmas nonsense but far far more pernicious.
If things are so biased in a way you don't like, if opinions were so easily shaped by storytellers you don't like, than you must be upset at how the last election turned out...
I must not be making myself clear because I didn't care for either of the major candidates. I'm talking more about how "the News" has a pro Israel bias(1) as just one small example of a much larger picture. Even in entertainment major productions, the villains are almost always depicted as bumbling & cruel Germans or Arabs. After a lifetime of seeing Germans & Arabs depicted as cruel morons that begins to leave an impression on gullible young minds that Germans & Arabs are cruel & dull witted in real life for example while nothing could be further from the truth in real life. Too many of those young minds tend to carry that same inaccurate stereotype into adult life. As a rule, I don't like war movies because of my military experiences and because they tend to glamorize the madness of war. Major WW2 movies, in my experience, are pathetically clownish & unrealistic with one exception and that was a German made movie called "Das Boot"(2) which could more accurately be considered an anti-war movie. I'm not saying that some excellent products haven't come out of Hollywood only that I take the depiction of controversial issues with a grain of salt. (1) “U.S. media coverage reveals a pro-Israel bias” http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2014/09/01/commentary/world-commentary/u-s-media-coverage-reveals-a-pro-israel-bias/#.WMLm5mafK_U EXCERPT “Why does TV news look like a Netanyahu ad?” asked Chris McGreal of The Guardian on July 31, in his article on the “notoriously pro-Israel mainstream media in the U.S.” In fact, three main dailies here from mid-July to mid-August easily gave the impression that U.S. President Barack Obama, not Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, was prosecuting a war against the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. The U.S. State Department continues to list the Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) as a terrorist organization. Meanwhile, the Wall Street Journal dispelled any doubt about which side it was on. On Aug. 2-3, its Review section gave a two-page spread — “In Defense of Zionism” — against an oversize photo of a flag-raising ceremony in Israel, in 1948.”CONTINUED "Das Boot" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Boot EXCERPT Das Boot (German pronunciation: [das ˈboːt], German meaning "The Boat") is a 1981 German war film written and directed by Wolfgang Petersen, produced by Günter Rohrbach, and starring Jürgen Prochnow, Herbert Grönemeyer, and Klaus Wennemann. It has been exhibited both as a theatrical release and as a TV miniseries (1985), in several different home video versions of various running times, and in a longer director's cut version supervised by Petersen in 1997. An adaptation of Lothar-Günther Buchheim's 1973 German novel of the same name, the film is set during World War II and tells the fictional story of U-96 and its crew. It depicts both the excitement of battle and the tedium of the fruitless hunt, and shows the men serving aboard U-boats as ordinary individuals with a desire to do their best for their comrades and their country."CONTINUED
I agree US media coverage is almost universally "pro Israel". The bigger picture being that the US media coverage is almost universally "pro" a lot of things. likewise "anti". Gee generational villians. Of course the Germans were the villians but nobody ever believed hogans heroes was an accurate depiction of them. course the Germans were replaced by the Russians,. Arabs have been a recent generational villian as have the north koreans. So The thin Red Line, Saving Private Ryan, Platoon, Full Metal Jacket, Apocolypse now, were pathetically clownish and unrealistic? Check out "the Bridge" for the ultimate german anti war movie, although I agree Das Boot was terrific.
I like to be fair in all things. Even if Jews controlled 95% of Hollywood, unless one can point to government laws that sanction such, it still wouldn't be something to point at - outside of making sure people know there's going to be an obvious slant in ANY story. And the video puts it at 70%. I've been everywhere, and the most common way to excel is through networking vs talent. In my great state of Idaho, I wouldn't be surprised if cliques of humans didn't make up 70%, if not higher, in ANY lucrative industry. Basically, don't point at Hollywood if you're not going to point at NASCAR. It just makes us look like ****** bags. There are tons of Jews helping to squash the left right now. Don't be pricks.
Well I'm talking about the media's supposed incredible bias and influence to "shape" things and the fact that the president is Trump...it simply doesn't make sense. As far as movies go, whatever influence they may or may not have, I don't really give a sh*t about them, they are just movies and I rarely watch them. As far as this basic and imo Nazi viewpoint that people here are expressing...what would you all like to do about it?
NASCAR? You’re comparing a sport where cars drive around to actual industries like Hollywood? Which has more of an effect shaping the culture of a society? And no, you’re not likely to find any other industry like Hollywood where such a small minority of people completely dominate an industry.
If they haven't broken any laws, there's nothing they've done wrong. It isn't their fault everyone doesn't know EVERYTHING from Hollywood has a weird, demonic leftist slant. Haha At this point, we have caught so many onto the fact, that they had to shut down the message boards on IMDB. I guarantee they've lost billions this year already with their progressive screenplays. Here soon they are going to have to find people like us to write scripts that are the opposite of everything they believe, simply because that's how badass we all are. lol At no point do we ever need to turn into law passing statists. Ever. We're the ones who make the money. They are all talk.
If true, sounds like they're doing what they want with their own money. Sounds like capitalism to me.
