. . . which would mean God blurs gender distinctions . . . which would make blurring gender distinctions godly. Was this meant to be a joke?
Liberals argue that things that by definition are not appropriate (unjustifiable) are justifiable. It doesnt make sense.
God is neither masculine or feminine but he presents himself in the masculine because even drawing undue attention to the vague abstract concepts of gender is perverted itself, even without drawing undue attention to the physical, sexual, reproductive aspects of gender.
Our entire lifestyle is against nature - just as well - saves us dying from 1000 lousy diseases - lets us talk to people far away, and fly thousands of miles.
You just said that both are aspects of God's image . . . which would mean God's image includes both. You are forgetting your own claims.
First you say he's both and then you say he's neither. Which is it? And if he didn't want to draw attention to gender, he wouldn't have presented himself as gendered at all. Presenting himself as masculine IS drawing attention to the concept of gender.
But they are scary. A vaccine is just the virus itself in a less dangerous form. You don't see anything un-natural with a virus being injected to stop the virus? Is that what nature intended? Viruses are a natural part of life and in nature they will kill a lot of the population, but the rest will be resistant, and that is just evolution. Vaccines mess with that natural process and prevent that evolution from occurring leaving the population dependent on more and more vaccines. Also, its pretty unnatural to have some needle stuck in your arm. Still scares me. Another unnatural thing are catheters. The idea of a tube being inserted into my junk absolutely feels lewd and unnatural.
1) Gay marriage is not natural, and as Americans, we always reject unatural things like eyeglasses, polyester, and lyposuction. 2) Gay marriage will make people gay, in the same way that tall people will make you tall. 3) Legalizing gay marriage will open the door to all kinds of crazy behavior. People may even wish to marry their pets because a dog has legal standing and can sign a marriage contract. 4) Straight marriage has been around a long time and hasn't changed at all; women are still property, blacks still can't marry whites, and divorce is still illegal. 5) Straight marriage will be less meaningful if gay marriage were allowed; the sanctity of Brittany Spears' 55-hour just-for-fun marriage would be destroyed. 6) Straight marriages are valid because they produce children. Gay couples, infertile couples, and old people shouldn't be allowed to marry because our orphanages aren't full yet, and the world needs more children. 7) Obviously, gay parents will only raise gay children, since straight parents only raise straight children. Gay marriage is not supported by religion. In a theocracy like ours, the values of one religion are imposed on the entire country. That's why we have only one religion in America. 9) Children can never succeed without a male and a female role at home. That's why we as a society expressly forbid single parents to raise children. 10) Gay marriage will change the foundation of society; we could never adapt to new social norms. Just like we haven't adapted to cars, the service-sector economy, or longer life spans...
homosexuality is defined as erotic activity between people of the same gender. Pornography is defined as erotic.
In a normal way it draws attention to gender. Its akin to the existence of sex. Its one thing for sex to exist, people talking about sex when they curse is decrepit and out of place and wierd.
Wierd things are not natural and are from the fall. A pornographic relationship between two men or women is not natural.