Why does Chelsea Clinton look older than Hillary ?

I was not aware the Clintons were friends with Harry Potter.

 

most Americans want 8 more years of Clinton in the white house

 

Well, none of this really matters as we all know but.... the future isn't looking good for the offspring.

 

That makes no sense. The left hated Romney, a 1%er elitist with offshore bank accounts. Now, they want one? Not to mention, Hildawg's track record is horrible as Sec of state. If Americans want her, then it PROVES that America has dumbed down. Lol, can't make this sh*% up.

 

They don't care about her being a 1%er, or bank accounts, ot even her lack of credibility, character or ability.

They care that she's... a "she".

It's all about celebrity and "firsts" for the left.

 

Lol, the liberals made such a big deal about Romney's offshore bank accounts. Hillary has offshore accounts and they say nothing. Quite pathetic, if you ask me.

 

Well, she did say she was "poor" in that failed biography she wrote.

I think that was the chapter after the "sniper fire" she had to duck.

She counts on the low-info voter.... and they are here supporting her.

 

I still really wouldn't be worried about her. Obama's failures means she has to really distance herself from all of the policies she used to support. It's what all the Dems are doing. This will come back to haunt her.

 

Compared to who? Chris Christie? Jeb Bush? http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hillary-clintons-lead-over-potential-2016-gop-foes-shrinks-poll/

"most" Americans still don't trust her.

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2014/...-faces-trust-deficit-with-voters-wsjnbc-poll/
Today, 38% of voters say she is “honest and straightforward,” compared with 40% who say she isn’t. That figure is better for Mrs. Clinton than in March 2008, during the Democratic primaries, when 33% said she was honest and 43% said she wasn’t. But she may have trouble making up more of that ground as she moves out of her self-imposed break from politics and is increasingly seen as a 2016 presidential candidate.

 

We dismiss Hillary at our peril....and until there is a Republican candidate who is not tainted by the past, we should be very careful to take her seriously. I personally do not see a viable contender in the wings, though I believe Huntsman could become a savior should we get our Shiat together.

 

Why is everyone off topic?

Isn't the point of the OP to obsess on Chelsea and ridicule her looks? (the only thing Repubs care about in women)

 

I wouldn't dismiss Hillary. She'll make a great rallying point, fund raiser and leader for the Democrats. She will surely influence the DNC's stance on the 2016 election. Coming out very early has problems. Too much time for others to collect dirt and muck rake. Better to wait until after next month's elections and, probably, several months into 2015. Say the Fall of 2015. That gives them a year of campaigning.

 

yep , ugly little acorn , just like mama hog.

 

Oldy, have you ever had a baby?

Actually I think Chelsea looks pretty good and obviously Hillary called in the make-up team experts to spruce her up......

 

Plus I think Hillary had some work .

- - - Updated - - -

Lazer surgery on her wrinkles perhaps. I'm not up on the latest tech in plastic surgery but I bet Hillary could tell you!