Paternity Fraud is a legally protected right for women, and it is absolutely disgusting. The idea that women have a human right to introduce another man's baby into a marriage/relationship and legally force the husband/significant other into providing half his lifes resources to raise a child that isn't his is a huge miscarriage of justice and feminism is the primary root cause. Why do feminists feel that a woman has a right to defraud a man into believing that a child is his, and force him by law to not only support that child, but to even have the ability by law, to deny him the right to find out through genetic testing if a child is his. I would like to hear from some of the wonderful feminists on the forum just how they can justify such blatant fraud and a legal double standard every bit as gross and disgusting as patriarchal double standards they claim exist, but really don't anymore. If there is any "patriarchal" double standards then those double standards exist because of mother nature and the biological differences between men and women(which are as large as those between humans and chimpanzees) and not through any active cultural conspiracy by men. But there most certainly IS a cultural conspiracy by women to protect women who engage in paternity fraud. Why?
So I take it by the overwhelming silence from the feminist set that Cuckoldry is not an acceptable activity to perform on your significant other? Alright, if that is the case.. why is Paternity Fraud being protected legally and all avenues that would release the cuckold male from bondage being crushed out of existence?
I do not see a reason to make it mandatory, it is no ones business to make such a decision but the parents involved in the relationship. If you have doubts there is no one stopping you from having a test done. The linked article seems a little outlandish in my opinion, and I think it is being purposely deceitful with many of its claims. I.E. a man raped has to pay his rapist child support. Personally I do agree that on certain equality issues women do want to have their cake and eat it too. I would be ok with fathers being able to opt out of being a father to even a biological child in certain situations. If it is a choice, it should be afforded to both potential parents on whether or not to have a baby.
Feminists sure picked a convenient time to care about children. They don't seem to give much of a (*)(*)(*)(*) when they're sucking them out of their wombs in pieces.
I find it amusing how feminists (and other progressives for that matter) have such blatent double-standards. When confronted on this, they usually just completely ignore the criticism and keep on proclaiming their ideology. I could go on and on with countless examples of this.
So basically this thread is to rant about women. Making dna testing at birth mandatory is absurd. No one is stopping anyone from having tests done just stopping them from being mandatory, sure there are a bunch of men who are not bitter big government authoritarians that would agree.
Why do you attempt to falsely project our views on to all women? We discuss a specific type of women, with a certain specific mindset and criticize such women. One cannot extend our criticism to all women in any intellectually honest form. ..and stop it with your "big government authoritarianism" sarcasm. We wish to reduce the size and inefficiency of the bureaucracy. You people are sick with your twisted delusions. Most Republicans hate the bureaucracy, not the righteous authority of the State.
So why must dna tests be mandatory for all? Why should the actions of a very small percentage of all women mandate dna tests to be preformed on all children born? Please tell me how that doesn't translate to big government sticking their nose in where it doesn't belong?
How about a rule that allows men to require a paternity test (at the man's expense) before they pay any child support? If the child turns out not to be his, the woman has to pay the man the cost of the test and he has no further responsibility for the child or the woman. Likewise, no man should be denied the right to confirm paternity with a paternity test. My personal favorite is the idea that if a child turns out not to be the husband's, the woman forfeits any claim to any property that the man had before they were married and any right to alimony. She violated the terms of the marriage - the "forsaking all others" part - so she forfeits rights to property claims.
