Note the " ' " mark, as I understand perfectly how "race" is impossible to define (like domestic dogs are of the same species as wolves, but look how different they are). The same thing can be said about "superiority" because it is completely subjective. If the meaning of life is to pursuit happiness, then an American teenager that has access to XOBX, PS3 and unlimited online porns may not be any more "superior" than an African teenager who enjoy a nice sunbathing by the beach. Then again, if "superiority" is measured in terms of intelligence, then it would be even more meaningless as Eastern Asians are considered smartest but it is Caucasians who had achieved most so far. Social structure also plays an important, if not, the most vital role. My point is, and if being reasonable you shall most definitely agree that if you are one of those who are concerned about your 'race' being diluted by other 'races', then what you must do is to try your best to preserve the culture, not the genetic material itself. There are tons of Caucasians living right now in the slums of Brazil and south Africa, and there are successful Africans like Condi Rice and Colin Powell. Meanwhile, for America to trumpet another century, America should actively fend off cultures with undesirable features while infusing other cultures with admirable characteristics. So to conclude, I think it's unreasonable to be against Latino immigration (legal or not), but reasonable to oppose the venezuela lard-butt mentality as is often the case with legal immigrants, not illegal ones, ironically give me a man that are willing to put his life one the line, go through miles after miles of desert just to make pennies, I'll give you a man of incredible gallantry and diligence.
