Tell that to Third Man. He has spent two days arguing that it is from 2003 Nothing there asserting the US trained death squads. And even if they had, it would have been in direct contradiction of the manual
I posted up a Channel 4 report from Afghanistan stating that the Americans are training death squads,dated 2009.
You full of (*)(*)(*)(*) man. The Haitian Intelligence service and FRAP were the death squads in Haiti. US forces even siezed records and photos of torture sessions involving the death squads and American advisors and told Haitian prosecutors they would not return them untill all references to Americans were deleted. The Clinton adminstration harbored high ranking death squad members, including Emmanuel Constant and refused to extradite them to Haiti for prosecution, in part, cause they would've exposed US involvement. Then the case would've gone to the World Court.
Silly, nothing there to support the assertin that the US trained them to be death squads. The Sergeant that flipped out and slaughtered 16 Afghan civilians was trained by the US. But he wasnt trained to kill 16 afghan civilians. Any actions even resembling death squads by the Haitian militias would be in direct contradiction of the manual that you allege trained them to be death squads. Thats why you cant quote anything from the manual, to support your assertions and why instead youve taken us on this historical tour, having nothing to do with the manual.
They were supporting them as they were murdering, torturing and raping thousands of Haitians. They supported them and the junta right to the end of their rule and even shielded and harbored them long after Aristide was restored to office. They did this cause, "U.S. suspicions of Aristide’s leftist populism prodded them to seek support from even the most brutal anti-Aristide elements." Would you say the same thing if the US was supporting Al Qeada? What if we discovered that a foreign power was supporting Al Qeada? Remember how they lied about Iraq supporting Al Qeada and how they used that as a pretext for invasion?
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fi-0J-U8Db8"]CIA Agent on Covert Action in Haiti[/ame] Former CIA agent, Phillip Agee explains CIA covert ops in Haiti: establishing and supporting death squads, coups, and dictators.
Yes not like Afghans are the ones being trained and that their families live in the village,of course they would not talk, Do you ever think before you post? No need to answer as we know the answer is no.
The Clinton admistration also continued to back the Guatemalan Himmler. The bloodbath continued untill 1996. Over 200,000 Guatemalan peasents, trade unionists, priests, nuns, journalists, teachers, human rights activists and dissidents were killed. On a side note, this article by the Los Angeles Times is very interesting... More Orwellian rationales offered as usual.
Silly, no one is denying that they were killed. We didnt train them to kill them. Their actions are CLEARLY in contradiction of the policy stated in the manual.
Revealing, you just dreamt that up off the top of your head, didnt you? Or did you leave out that portion of the article?
You should really read more and then you would actually know something. Just typing BS on the internet is not going to get you anywhere in life and you certainly are not going to learn anything. If you even had the slightest idea about Afghanistan and the people there then you would know what I said is correct but as it is you do not. Stick to faux news,it is more up your street.
You dont even read anything shown, even when highlighted. The fact that you have 61,039 credits is a little scary.
Says the guy who doesnt have an answer to my question but feels the need to post in reply to it anyway.
I answered your question a few times now but you just want to ignore those answers. If you are not happy with my answer then tough.
Yes that is called an answer. It is when people quote your post and write an answer underneath is. Glad I could clear that up for you.