Woman says Roy Moore initiated sexual encounter when she was 14, he was 32

How many is he allowed?

 

This is pathetic. The Washington Post, a Democrat globalist owned publication, ran the headline in huge letters stating as fact:
Woman says Roy Moore initiated sexual encounter when she was 14, he was 32

To back this up, the author claims 3 other women had similar experiences.

But then, buried in the middle, it states:
" None of the three women say that Moore forced them into any sort of relationship or sexual contact."
Still buried further down, it finally states the women were on the campaigns of political opponents.

This story instantly was repeated by virtually every media and news outlet.

NOTABLY, not ONE even mentions that Roy Moore, married to his wife for 32 years and this allegation about something with NO witnesses and NO evidence of 39 years ago, has denied the accusation.

Rather, EVERY press outlet ran the story as FACTS and as if Moore did not deny or refused to comment, when in fact he has denied. The Democratic Press LITERALLY refuses to run his denial or give him any opportunity to defend himself against accusations by staff members of political opponents.

THIS IS HOW CORRUPT the corporate and global propaganda media is.

 

Remember when The Weiner was first accused of electronic digital perversion he said that it was not his digit. Then it was his wiener but that someone hacked into his wiener box.

 

Burn the witch.....

 

Did Moore do any recorded interviews with Billy Bush?

 

RWers believe a person is innocent until proven guilty. LWers seem to think all RWers are guilty until proven innocent. Why is this so?

 

no surprise as only inbreds voted for him and alabama is full of them

 

While I agree with you about sexual predators......still the part that needs to be Highlighted.

IF.....If he Is guilty. Kind of like, IF that frog had wings it wouldn't hit its ass when it hops.


Unlike Johnny Quest McCain who thinks Moore is guilty until he proves his innocence.



Calling for Moore to step aside "if" allegations are true

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/a...pursued-14-year-old-girl-list/article/2640206

 

The Democrat wolf-in-sheeps-clothing messages that incessantly recite and rant every Democrat talking point? By her message history, hell would have to freeze over before she would mention he fully denies these allegations made by campaign staff members of his political opponents claiming accusations of nearly 4 decades ago.

 

Yes, the one you defend when others mention her. If she didn't mean so much to you. You wouldn't get all flabbergasted and overzealous about her.

Yeah, as you can see I was talking about Moore with others a bit more important like than you.

 

Since the woman is alleging he committed a criminal offense that makes it slander-per-se. The statute of limitations has run on her to sue or prosecute him. But since she said this now, he fully can sue her. Because it is not just liable, but liable-per-se, in a civil suit he would bring it would be legally assumed your accusation is false, deliberately and maliciously false for which she is liable for for his court costs, attorney fees and punitive damages UNLESS she can prove it happened. The burden of proof would be on her. If it is a she-says, he-says case, by law he wins.

If you publicly accuse someone of a crime you have a strict duty to prove the accusation is true if you are sued.

 

Republicans clearly are eager to dump Moore. Democrats love having him as an opponent.

Court verdicts are not the determinant of political viability.

 

Good point. Still, there is the problem of statue of limitations and an actual conviction....unless you think people should be harmed over rumors and unproven allegations.

 

None of which absolves you from this statement:

 

Give that man a cigar. At least a couple of you with those leftist leanings were able to comprehend that.

Oh and even if he was sitting on the Bench. It would have been the end of his career then.

 

Let him sue her and see how that works out. Besides, it appears she's not the only woman accusing him of sexual advances and inpropriety.

Yes, I don't like the idea of false accusations for political reasons, but, even more, I don't like the idea of my wife, sisters, nieces and other female relatives having to put up with sexual asshats who think they can do as they please, including statutory rape or, in the case of Weinstein, actual rape. This shouldn't be political. This should be about right and wrong.

 

No it was relevant.....for some odd reason you didn't think he could avoid the question, like your kind does.

 

'Disturbing and Disqualifying.' Senate Republicans Call on Roy Moore to Step Aside Amid Allegations!

HILLARY!​

 

Did you miss where I wrote " Still, if Moore is a pedophile"?

 

Hillary is still a liar and corrupt politician regardless of Moore's guilt or innocence.

 

Do you believe that that the Republicans calling for him to step aside must have criminal convictions before they can do so?

No, that is incorrect.

 

Imagine that.

 

No...that's not how liable-per-se works. You are not required to prove that someone committed a crime in a case where you are being sued for liable.

And here's a larger problem with your argument, she is not accusing him of statutory rape. She is accusing him of kissing her while she was 14. Now, the later is enough evidence to convict someone of statutory rape, but that is not the same as her accusing him of a crime.

 

It is a fact that he was accused him of sexually molesting a 14 year old girl.

And his denial came after the story was published. Washington Post would have reached out to him for a comment before published the story.

 

The only one calling for Moore to step aside whether the allegations are true or false. Is Johnny Quest McCain. Any others fall back on that lil word with a mighty big definition.....IF!