Women who love abortion, where is your passion against mis-diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Women who love abortion, where is your passion against mis-diagnosis of Breast Cancer?

WHY do so many of you just sit back and allow Gyno-Docs to just tell you anything about your breasts and you believe it?

WHY is that you allow the Gyno-Docs and Breast Surgeons to fearmonger you into nervous breakdowns to have all these ugly surgeries that deform your beautiful bodies, just they can make a fast buck? and in turn kill you with Chemo and other experimental drugs.!!!!!


WHY???

Where is your outrage for THAT!!????

Where is your outrage for the war on your bodies by the Gyno-Docs and Surgeons lying to you daily just to get you up on that butcher's block?!!!!


BREAST SURGERY IS BIG BUSINESS!!! WHERE IS YOUR OUTRAGE AGAINST THAT?!

 

Because 9 out of 10 abortion lovers also prefer enhanced breasts. Perhaps that is why you see a lack of outrage ... or it could be that "abortion lovers" are close to non existent and being pro-choice has nothing to do with ones stance on unethical doctors or breast cancer.

 

You may be 30 years behind the times..........

 

I can't even... *sigh*

 

But the butcher shops are still 24/7....I guess the protests didn't work?

an uneducated populous is only feed for the greedy.

 

You women would think you'd have the upperhand on lying Docs by now, but it appears that all they have to do is put that fear in your mind that it's a malignant tumor and you must be cut. and off you go to the butcher shop. whatever happen to knowing your own bodies and learning where diseases like breast cancer come from?

Planned Parenthood is not really helping you guys on this issue are they? this is proof.


They would rather ease your mind and tell you that you have BC, when a great number of that is not even BC at all.

Why are you guys still funding this racket?

Fear, the great equalizer.

 

I don't think there is a single thing in the OP that makes a link of sense.

I think he is against abortion, but even that is just purely speculative on my part.

 

And one that I happen to know was a real dilemma.

Woman is pregnant- and finds out that she has cancer.

Without radiation and chemo treatment, the woman will most likely die, perhaps before she gives birth.

With radiation and chemo- the woman will likely survive but the fetus will die- or be at best be horribly defective.

For the anti-choice folks- what is the proper course?

 

I like internet logic. Such as:

You always win an argument using caps lock.

 

Ignorance is the anchor of any society.

 

Proof???

Really this thread reads more like an entry into a "Proof or Paranoia" contest

 

let's no be ignorant here.

Women are clueless, Doctors control their every move. Doc says "cut em off" and no other voice of reason matters. It's truly a zombie mind state women are in.

 

Too late. It was too late from the very original post.

 

"My doctor takes care of me"

Is the ignorance I hear from women all the time with BC. I just have to shed a tear and keep moving. they're not gonna listen to common sense after a coupld shots of chemo...#Loopy

 

The original post. It was too late from the title.

 

That would be a tough call I dare say. I see no profit in abortion, but I see no profit in dead women either. I suppose it would really depend on her family circumstances, the type of cancer and how aggressive it is ( in some cases of liver cancer you are SOL if you get diagnosed with it simply because they can't stop the bleeding in time among other compliations.) and whether or not she had desire to give birth before dying, or try to live to try again if possible (chemo and rads can do a number on your reproductive systems). Are there extended family that could look after the child if the mother perished?

It is a crap sandwich to be sure. But ultimately that is something in the patient's hands. I'm one of those pro life guys who think the woman should have her choice as well, I just don't think that the government should pay for it under any circumstances because it inevitably be a "because I don't want to take responsibility for my actions" kind of deal.

That situation is a tragic one at best, but life plays both sweet melodies and cruel tricks on us. For that situation though it is a sad affair with no real joyous outcome in my eyes.

 

Oh but you're soooo wrong here. plastic surgery is BIG BUSINESS. Docs cut the women up and mentally scar them to seek our Plastic Surgery, causing more mental damage and monetary gain for the Butchers..they don't care, it's about their bottomline...$$$$$$

let's not get into the sadistic side of Docs who lust after cutting women for their breasts. that's another topic. that's BIG business too.


Nip Tuck

 

4Horsemen said,

It is big business…but no doctor would perform if there were not women in line to have surgeries done. No one is forcing them to do this. I am sick and tired of people making excuses for people…in this case the women who abort the women who who get boob jobs. More boob jobs are done on women who don't have cancer than do. This is elective surgery. Let not put the blame on just the doctors. No abortionist would perform abortions without women who willingly hire the hit.

 

As far as doctors getting off on performing surgeries……ok I am sure there are some…as there are some women who get off on having surgeries to their bodies….they are Barbies.

 

That whole argument about "because I don't want to take responsibility for my actions" is such a lie - and so many have bought into it it is sad

World wide there is something like 40 million abortions per year - mostly in third world countries and mostly backyard abortions that put the health and life of women in severe jeopardy. Ask yourself if abortion were merely "because I don't want to take responsibility for my actions" why would so many women world wide take such a risk.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_IAW.html

Then again a very very large are women in stable relationships with more than one child

http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/fb_induced_abortion.html

Considering nearly half have incomes below the poverty level and a proportion of those already have a child - having an abortion can be the responsible thing as they try to support the child/children they do have

And waits for the inevitable "then they should not have opened their legs"

(((((((((((((((((((((((((sigh))))))))))))))))))))))))

And the SAME members who post comments like this never ever say one word about MEN taking greater responsibility

 

My point exactly. women are being led like guinea pigs to the slaughter. they don't realize that a healthy diet alone can rid the breasts of any would-be growths. which may or may not be cancerous. Docs are to blame 100% because they are the "trust centers" for women and they prey on that. they are not in it to help women don't ever believe that. they have an expensive office they just built that needs to be paid for. they have cares, homes, classes to take to stay current in their license, etc...all these fees drive their need to get you on that butcher's block. don't get it twisted. this is all about $$$.

Planned Parenthood is in on it too. It's all a racket. women need to wake up. don't accpet the lies that you have HPV, they most likely gave it to you during your last pap smear.

Don't accpet the lie that you have a malignant growth in your breasts and it's hereditary, THOSE ARE LIES!!!...The body CAN heal itself of ANY dis-ease!!! no need for cutting!

WAKE UP!! PUT THESE BUTCHERS OUTTA BUSINESS!!

 

Diet can cure breast cancer?

See why you do not have link for THAT one

Tell me - does the same logic apply to prostate cancer?

 

Indeed, men should take responsibility for their actions, I never said otherwise. Every person should take responsibility for their own actions, do not assume that because I didn't say something that I mean what you say - that is bizarre logic at best.

But yes, they probably shouldn't be opening their legs if they aren't prepped for a child to enter their lives. And they shouldn't be opening their legs just to keep a guy around, if that is the only reason the guy is around than they should really evaluate their relationship prospects and choice of mate. The same rationale applies to men just as it does for women.

One thing that you neglect to mention is that their are guys who don't want their kid to get whacked in the womb. Has that thought ever crossed your mind? The man has ZERO say in the life of his unborn child. When men get a say in that matter then indeed you can clamour all you like - heck I'd clamour with you - for men to take responsibility. But since the man has zero say in the matter why should he bother for reasons other than social pressure or other personal reasons? No incentive for him other than his own genetic material being spread around and simply following paternal instincts.

And why do women take such a risk in other countries? ...perhaps they do not want to deal with the aftermath of procreating. I can't fathom why a mother would want to end the life of her child, but the facts are people do dangerous things all the time without apparent logic. For health concerns? There are times when it is legitimate, these are very few. Rape? Fewer.

 

yes, healthy diet alone rids the body of ALL impurities. the blood heals the body. if the blood is dirty, the body will be dirty. and that's all breast cancer is, just like prostate cancer. impurities in the body that the blood has no idea what to do with so it begins to "surround" this object and harden, thus calling it "cancer". It's a LIE.

NO DISEASE can live in an Alkaline environment. NONE. but disease and germs can THRIVE and in an Acidic environment. Scientific facts.

So if the body is more alkaline than acidic, guess what? you are disease free and will continue to be such.

it's the lies being told.....fast food, luxurious restaurants and TV dinners are loaded with Butter, refined salt, uncooked meats, MILK, white flour, etc....ALL POISONOUS AND ACIDIC to the Blood. and when you have this overwhelming rampage of this stuff for years and years, it's no wonder a person has gall stones the size of baseball and heart failures and clogged arteries.

LIFE AND DEATH IS IN THE FOOD YOU EAT!

You can save your breasts and remain healthy and attractive or you can continue following that depressing road of lies that you and your loved ones have breast cancer all the time. LIES......LIES...LIES...

 

Sigh. 500 years of scientific advances thrown away.

Anything with a PH over 7 is consider 'alkaline'.

The normal pH of blood running through arteries (large elastic-walled blood vessels that carry blood from the heart to other parts of the body) is 7.4; the pH of blood in the veins (vessels that transports blood to the heart) is about 7.35. Normal urine pH averages about 6.0. Saliva has a pH between 6.0 and 7.4.

Source: Guyton, Arthur C. Textbook of Medical Physiology, 8th ed., pp. 331, 340, 711.

E. coli Bacteria is accustomed to a ph of 7.8- which is alkaline.

Other than that- everthing you said- generally- is just idiotic. Many of the foods you mentioned can indeed be unhealthy. We should all strive for a healthy diet- but your overall thesis is neither a fact or even a seriously considered alternative theory.