Would you be willing to accept temporary mass starvation to get rid of welfare?

Here's a thought.

The Mayor doesn't care if "the gap" is filled.

He owes his lice no blood.

He owes YOUR lice no blood, either.

 

You didn't see the Romney-Kennedy debates in 1994,did you?

There was a national rash (yes, just like diaper rash, they were full of (*)(*)(*)(*)) pony tailed guys, and at the R-K debate this particular bit of Too Much Chili In The Baby stood up and his statement/question was:

"The government is like our parents. What are you going to do to help us?"

Drunken Teddy blathered about how he's steal more money from the taxpayers because every vote is expensive to get.

Romney blathered "me too".

The correct answer, the one that might have put Romney in the Senate and possibly the White House, was:

"Ask not what your country can do for you, ask rather what you can do for your country".

 

We had starvation during the Great Depression because FDR destroyed food to artificially sustain the price of farm produce.

For DemocRATs like FDR the votes of dead people are a sure thing, the votes of living farmers have to be purchased.

 

Time to ship the illegal alien invaders out.

Nobody gave them permission to come in anyway (that is what "illegal" means).

 

Can we save the political party sanctimonious BS, and just answer the questions as they are asked without all the "it's the other party's fault" BS.

How many families are you willing to take in to make this charity thing work? It's a simple basic question.

 

So you hate the constitution and do not believe in any common good. Got it thanks for the truthfulness from the cheap seats in the supremacist section.

 

That way would could put people to work for what. 2 bucks an hour? Then instead of starving quickly, they just do it slower over time.

 

The farmers themselves destroyed the crops since they could not afford to store them or get them to market. This started during the Hoover admin. Most of the actual starvation took place before FDR took office. Your claim that FDR caused the starvation is completely false and whatever source you got that from is either completely ignorant or telling bald face lies.

 

It IS the RAT'S fault. FD Socialist R created the welfare state, and Lying B Tonkin Gulf Johnson created the Ain't So Great Society, and Carter created the bank-busting CRA, all the economic problems of the US have been caused by DemocRATs and socialists.

Just because you don't like that fact does not make that fact go away.

Again, the Mayor does not give a flying (*)(*)(*)(*) about the lice feeding on his blood, and the best thing would be for the lice to die as soon as possible, if they can't stop feeding on others.

As many as the Mayor bears a responsibility for.

ONE.

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah, keep pretending. SOME of the farmers may have done that...most of them wouldn't be stupid enough to destroy what little they'd earned... ...nope, most of that destruction, and subsequent starvation and death, was due to, of course, socialism.

 

Yup, all people who insist the Constitution be obeyed hate the Constitution. That makes perfect sense, at least it must to the people Stupid enough to vote for King Obama, Fascist and Traitor.

 

Charity isn't like it was in the 30's, 40's and 50's because of the welfare policies we implemented in the 60's which turned out to be extremely destructive to the family structure---especially to the black family.

To say that we can't change policy once we see the consequences is rediculous. Its not easy---but it is healthy to do so. Churches and charities give incredible amounts of money to missions, third world and organizations that they can help with here in the U.S. If the welfare policies were changed and their became a need in the U.S---priorities would be adjusted. People manage out of poverty more successfully if they accept charity as a gift as opposed to expecting welfare as an entitlement.

 

Well, what ever your misguided opinion is, like it or not FDR saved this nation from financial ruin, unfortunately the two party scam has taken us to that point yet again. The rich/elites (both democrat and republican) of the day signed on realizing if they didn't the country was going to fail, which lead to 30 years of prosperity for this nation. Carter may have started it but it was on Reagan's watch where deregulation of the banks was taken to such levels that we almost went into another depression even more devastating than the great, 30 years later. That trend continued on by two other republicans and a democrat. Your problem is you point absolute blame without holding your own party accountable for their part.

So the answer to the question will 'charity' fill the void in taking care of the truly needy if government subsidies are completely eliminated, is a resounding "NO", if you and Smart Lady have your way. We could save a lot of nonsense if you would just answer the questions directed towards you.

 

You hate individual rights, and therefore the constitution is you floor mat. And I didn't vote for Obama, nor would I ever vote for a democrat or the other corporate owned party. Democrats/republicans hate the constitution in their own way. Keep in mind for future reference that disagreeing with extremist nut jobs who cherry pick their facts to fit their misguided agenda, doesn't automatically make a person a member of the opposite corporate owned party.

 

Nobody from here said that the system needs to remain the same. If you don't understand something maybe you should ask questions a stop with absurd accusations and assumptions.

The system we have now is about eliminating competition, destroying public education, monopolizing industries for maximum profits, and forcing a huge portion of the population into relative poverty therefore dependency on the best government corporate money can buy.

Forcing a major portion of the population into ignorance and/or dependency after 50 years of handed down government induced family tradition, and then yanking that out from under them, is simple abuse, not much different that yanking the wings off bugs, then torturing them for fun. In a word sadistic. Of course it is also par the course for supremacists.


This country's problems are much more complex than blaming a bunch of poor people with no wealth, and/or power.

 

No.

FDR made the Depression the Federal Reserve caused last an entire decade, with a severe depression inside the depression, the first and only time that's happened in history.

Naturally people like you worship FDR. He is, after all, the third worst president the nation's ever had.

Wilson is the worst, Obama comes in second, then there's Ponzi Scheme FDR, and Carter the Fourth, stupid and ignorant.

 

Fascists only demand policy changes until they succeed in getting the damaging policies they need, and then those policies must never change, because fascists understand and love destruction for destruction's sake.

NOBODY believes the US public school system is intended to educate anyone. Especially not the fascists that run them. Public schools in the US are intended to expand ignorance, since only the ignorant vote for fascists.

 

No. You'd have the blood of millions on your hands. Think about all the newborns that pro-lifers fought so hard to keep alive; once they were born its like saying "ok now its ok to die".

 

Yes. ALL libertarians hate the Constitution, individual liberty, and freely made choices that don't get people killed.

That makes perfect sense.

Why do you waste time spewing your nonsense at the Mayor? All you do is illuminate your ignorance for everyone else to see, if they weren't already aware of it.

 

The Congressman is assuming that everyone believes in his brand of religion; not everyone subscribes to that line of thinking; in fact not everyone believes in religion period, so its a flawed rationale on his part.

 

No if the rich would have had their way, we would have been the Mexico of today in the late 1940's and probably wouldn't have came out on top in WWII. I don't worship him at all, I just understand how certain decisions had to be made to put the country back on the right track, just like today certain decisions that neither of the corporate owned parties of today are willing to make, need to be.

 

Why do repeat nonsense you have heard from propagandists with an agenda? And why do you speak of yourself in 3rd person?

You realize this could be the first stages of a mental disorder. Maybe you are just seeking attention. Possibly from guilt/shame/embarrassment, that deep down you know you are wrong and inadequate. Possibly low self-esteem is the key. You may feel like an outsider, that you don't fit in, as this would be a symbolic way to represent yourself in a disasociated manner. People who do this may be coping with some issues that need to be brought into light. You should look at other aspects of your behavior. If this behavior is deliberated towards some and not others, those who you direct this impersonal self-reference towards may be people who you feel neglected by. You may be sanely trying to say, in an oblique manner, "You don't acknowledge me, and so now neither do I." How sad.

 

Yeah, it's gotta be awful, growing up mentally disabled AND a public school graduate in this day and age.

The things they fill those empty heads up with, these days. No wonder the Low Information Touchy Feely Voter likes RATS.

- - - Updated - - -

The Mayor doesn't post for your edification.

He posts to people smart enough to not support Obama.

 

Got any clue how Jamestown Colony was saved from starvation?

No, of course you don't.

YES.

 

Oh I wouldn't worry any about mass starvation. It's coming soon enough. And it won't be coming from the fat bible thumping hand of some smug republican congressman. Nor will it apply only to welfare recipients. The Goddess of Life has Her Cosmic Rolling Pin out and is getting ready to use it against every one of us. Rich, poor, black, white, republican, democrat, gay, straight, man, woman, adult, child,...all of us. She'll be paying us back for the seven crimes of man. Which crimes? Oh you know, the usual. War, Pollution, Overpopulation, Genocide, Rape, Tyranny, and Despoliation.

Extinction is Her way when a species destroys its habitat.

Mark Twain - The Art of Inhumation
"With the above brief references to inhumation, let us leave the subject. As for me, I hope to be cremated. I made that remark to my pastor once, who said, with what he seemed to think was an impressive manner--
'I wouldn't worry about that, if I had your chances.' "

 

The people who would let most of the poor starve are the ones who think that they will be on the top of the food chain and able to benefit from the masses willing to work for slave wages just to have something to eat.

They ignore that fact that they taste like pork.