You Tube censorship of Der Feuhrer Hogg's campaign video

So a unarmed student should had try to take down someone armed with an assault rifle where the onsite police officer did not confront the shooter?

My guess is he and any numbers of others students might have some survivors guilt but that would hardly be called for.

 

Interesting given your writings on this website but I would love to know how you respond to question number 4

[/QUOTE]

 

Out of 37 traits, I have very few alexithymia traits.

Why do you think that it's so ?

I know why.



Are you honest enough to honestly take the test and post the real results ?

 

I already did that as a matter of fact on this thread today.

 

EXACTLY!!!

All these attacks the alt-right are doing is fantastic.

They maybe horrible for decent people to watch....and they are absolutely disgusting. But they are empowering more and more people to attack these people (politically) without mercy.

Every attack from the alt-right/NRA-lovers just helps them dig their own political graves just a little deeper.

And the fact that most of these people are middle-aged/old and their 'enemies' are largely younger - just further spells their inevitable defeat.

 

Yes I had gotten the impression that you would strangely feel better if far more then 17 students was killed and 15 wounded from an attack using one rifle;

Still not bad at all for one former student being able to put bullets holes, using one rifle, into 32 humans.

Assuming that the average victim was hit two times that would mean that the rifle was fired at least 64 times for the hits and adding the normal amount of miss rounds total fire would be a hundred rounds.

Nothing like having large magazines for those rifles.

I was wrong the news is reporting he fired around not a hundred times but a 150 times from that rifle.

 

delete

 

You Tube ???

 

I'm talking about all the other videos we posted in the parkland thread that were completely removed. No one has addressed all those.

 

I guess those who witnessed the death of their friends and teachers aren't survivors, they were merely the audience.

Going "godwin" on a 17 year old kid is just the thing to amuse the far right. OTOH, it saves having to find a microscope to examine the content of the author's character.

I believe in free speech. I also believe that if you want to dish it out, you better be prepared to get it back.

 

Exactly how many of the 3,1000 students witnessed death ? 50 ? 100 ? 125 ?

David Hogg saw no dead or wounded bodies, saw no blood and barely heard ****, he wasn't even sure what he was hearing because he was so far away from there the shootings were taking place.

 

I see. So the issue with Hogg et.al. is that they weren't close to the action and therefore... what exactly? Does this disqualify him speaking out? Does this disqualify his opinion? Does this qualify hi for the dispicable ad homs being flung at these kids?

Or are you just whining about the semantics of the "survivor" description?

 

Look at it this way. You're at the beach, Your're in the water. 50 yards away one swimmer get's caught in a riptide, panics and drowns.

Are you a survivor ?

3,000 of the students were never in harms way.

Many might have had a tragic experience and need some decompression but none are survivors.

 

Do you even know what Usenet is? I am just saying that because you are anonymous here, but people had a way of hunting down others on Usenet and causing havoc in their real lives as they exposed their easily butt hurt ways to the trolls. This is a very nice place where the mods keep some control over the conversation. Usenet was free speech on a level most cannot deal with. Places like 4Chan are just shadows of what that used to be. Just saying you have little idea what a Nazi or free speech actually is from the looks of things.

 

Your attempts to undermine his reputation are stellar, but they just come off petty and jealous. The kid was there and it was his school. It is not his job to go fight a machine gun wielding psychopath for an education. Your calls for him to have done something are absurd and even problematic. He had one job when the shooting began, and that was to go into lock down. The only thing acting like a cowboy gets you is dead and screwing up legitimate attempts to stop the shooter. You are not Rambo, and no one wants you wading into a gunfight and trying to play hero. That is because you are more dangerous to everyone but the shooters in a scenario like that. You are one of the problems thinking running off half cocked is a heroic or useful thing to do.

Let us just hope you never have opportunity to play hero because there will most certainly be innocent victims of friendly fire resulting from your interference.

 

You cannot refute the facts I have presented. The irony of a radical ilk screeching "Nazis!" actually having Nazis as their brethren in trumpery is blatant.

Attempting to smear survivors of a firearm massacre by resorting to "Nazi!" hysterics in no way discredits the students, nor their expressing the views of the majority of Americans.

The Daily Stormer, a Neo-Nazi and white nationalist news website, is throwing its support behind Donald Trump.
​

After Charlottesville:

The irony of extremists evoking their "Nazi!" nonsense is that their messiah was endorsed by neo-nazis, and they continue to promote his agenda:

 

Calm down I think you got what I was saying wrong.

 

I apologize if that is the case.

I note the irony of the fake attacks by hardcore Trumpies upon high upon school kids as "nazis" is amusing because their co-religionists in Trump worship are avowed nazis.

 

I am definitely aware of the obvious ties trump has to real Nazis and criminal syndicates including the Russian and American mob.

 

The issue with David Hogg is, his past is being exposed and that the Hogg was an anti gun activist long before the shootings at the Parkland high school.

 

So that means he was always this way and is not some opportunist who just decided to be anti gun. You are undermining your own insults.

 

Ends up the kid (Hogg) was an anti-gun activist back in 2017 way before the Parkland shootings.

Explains why he had a big hard-on in his pants and all of the video taking during the shootings.

David Hogg was just as happy as CNN was when the shootings were taking place.

 

That is an interesting lie, but no one was happy about the shooting.

 

So what? Does that make his opinions any less relevant AFTER such a horrific event?

There's a reason why free speech is the FIRST amendment.

 

What explains the one in your pants?