Zimmerman waives right to Stand Your Ground Hearing Part II

Could it be because "FELONY" was involved?

Which obviously it wasn't in the Martin/Zimmerman case.

 

Since Martin wasn't killed based upon a suspicion why do you make such a claim?

- - - Updated - - -

The assault Martin committed on Zimmerman would have been charged as a felony assault had he lived to be arrested for it.

 

This theory would work if George ONLY called 911 on blacks. Can that successfully be argued?

 

So, you are saying that the only interest you have in this case is based on your hatred of the President?

Nice to know. . . I was wondering where all the hatred you seem to have toward an innocent kid came from. Thank you for clarifying this for us.

What did I post about Z. . .except that he is a "WANNABE vigilante, and a loser?"

I believe you called the INNOCENT teenager a THUG, a "budding criminal," and that "society was better off with him being dead." You also spewed a lot of trash at his parents and even his girl friend.

Would you like to show what "horrible" things I said about Zimmerman?

 

I think you need to review the records of Zimmerman's calls to 911!

He even called in a 9 year old Black kid! But I would be happy to look at any call he made where he said he suspected a WHITE person!

Please provide a link.

 

I wonder how much attention this case would have gotten if Zimmerman was black instead of Hispanic .

 

If he was Black and he had shot an unarmed teenager then been sent home without even a slap on the wrist. . . I am pretty sure that any one knowing about this injustice would have reacted.

However, it is pretty clear that, if he had been Black, and especially if he had shot a White kid, he would have been send to jail immediately, so there wouldn't have been a public outcry needed to pursue an investigation of the case.

 

I find it funny how many blacks have killed blacks but yet no coverage . When a Hispanic who looks white kills a black who was trying to bash their brains in , it gets attention . One thing to note is how far away black leaders have ran from this case .... Very telling .

 

If you can prove that George only called on black people, then awesome!

 

No, dear. YOU are the one who brought up this "theory."

If you can prove that George called as many (or close to it) White or Hispanic "suspects" in than Black people. . .pleased do so.

If you can't, we will all know what it means. . .once again you will have spoken without factual basis to your statement.

 

I wonder if the defense will ask the DeeDee if Martin discussed calling the police at all. Maybe she will slip and tell the courtroom that Martin wanted to set up an ambush. Maybe she wont even show up? Should be interesting.

 

I assume that insult means that you do not have any means to prove your point?

Does that mean you can't find a factual link showing that Zimmerman called in as many (or even close to it) "NON Black" suspects than "Black suspects?

 

She says on tape Trayvon wanted to BEAT Zimmerman. Its so over.

 

Could it be because many whites like yourself don't really see that as news.

I guess his white father really doesn't matter at all in the equation does he.

I thought you labeled them as "race baiters" when they did run to it. Btw who are the black leaders you are speaking of?

 

I am pretty sure you would have, I was speaking to Rosepopl

Oh I agree, anytime I see a grown man that is definitely larger than a teenager shoot and kill said teenager I have a problem with that.

I haven't seen too many GROWN MEN that can't handle a 158lb teenager.

Of course, I am still trying to figure out what is "suspicious" about a teenager walking down te street talking on a cellphone.

That is a no brainer.

You hit the nail right on the head.

 

That is a lot of "wonder" and "maybe's!"

Aren't you the one who found it so strange that I should engage in "speculation?"

What I do agree with is. . .that the trial WILL BE very interesting!

 

Nope, thats definitely not it.

 

It has been provided to you based on the evidence and done so repeatedly why do you pretend otherwise. Martin was not killed because he was acting suspiciously he was killed because he had assaulted Zimmerman and had him pinned to the ground and was threatening him with serious bodily harm or death. That is the weight of the evidence and you have nothing to refute it beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

I'm sorry, but the ONLY person who states that is Zimmerman. . . who is obviously the person who has the most reason to lie about what really happened.

Unless you have a more factual link, I prefer to see the REAL evidence presented at trial.

Until then, and unless you provide something else as evidence than Zimmerman's self-serving (and changing) statements, I will assume that you have no credible sources for your statement.

 

You still have the problem of the SYG law. Martin had legal justification for beating the crap out of a boy bumper chasing him at night.

Z had no right to harm Martin until he had made reasonable efforts to disengage, like telling martin that he was Neighborhood Watch and that the cops were coming.

If that little pansy could get his hand on his weapon, why couldn't he get Martin's hands off his face?

Combine that with the fact that his owies do not look like they were from hitting his mushy little head on concrete and the boy looks like a whiney little school yard bully lying to cover up his assault on another student.