There isn't. The point it was tring to make is to show the double standard on how feminists and society that wants to please them thinks it's okay to abuse men and that to see men suffering from violence is funny to these feminists and their supporters. If these things were done to women, people would be all outraged. And, has already been expressed earlier in this thread, many people don't like men even expressing any form of dissent and call it whining and say that we have to man up and shut up and just accept it.
Ah, common! It's good to be a man in this world. Feminism can be stupid sometimes but oppressive? No.
The OP is still just hasty generalization .. unless of course the author can show that every feminist or even the majority of feminists are radical. Every single group that has ever existed has had radical elements, to judge all of that groups members by that is just plain disingenuous. As to the issues involved concerning men then why not take a leaf out of other's books and if you really feel that the pendulum has swung to far then form your own group dedicated to addressing the imbalance . .sitting at a computer and basically moaning about it will not change a damn thing.
Fully understand the point .. but do you think posting on a internet forum is going to change anything?
Oh, so now you're claiming you care if one little thing is unfair to men despite writing you don't care if one little thing is unfair to men-eh??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
That's really disingenuous to dismiss the radical fringe who have trumped the word for themselves. The actual term is called Equity Feminist as coined by Christina Hoff Sommers in her book "Who Stole Feminism". it's a good book that you should read sometime. And people like Madonna refuse to use the term Feminists and instead prefer to call them a humanist because of the radical feminists hurting the term.
Yes, it was a generalization, but it wasn't hasty. It was based on the behavior of countless feminists-including feminists on this board
I remember a guy said that in a room with many women. As soon as he made a reference to 'penis envy', all the women erupted into a spontaneous, unstoppable, raucous laughter. The guy left the room, red-faced. Sigmund Freud is dead. Died of mouth cancer. A lot of the stuff that came out of his mouth WAS cancerous. Particularly to women. Far more reason for there to be womb envy given its incredibly miraculous abilities... Feminism
Did you just say penis envy? Zero credibility. You have zero credibility now. Using outdated terms like... penis envy. omg! - - - Updated - - - Enlighten me.
Penis envy is a real thing. If it wasn't real why else would radical feminists want to emasculate men?
As I understand it, the OP isn't worried about being emasculated... he's worried about being beaten up. Never seen a man so scared of women. A shrink would have a good time with this one.
Aren't you the woman who thinks men who don't hit pregnant women are wimps?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
The only spoiled ignorant brats are feminists. Those women are principled, intelligent, and moral. I wish I could say the same thing about feminists.
Experience and Facts are both great teachers. Particularly other people's experience, and facts like: over 50% of marriages end in divorce over 70% of those are no fault and are initiated by women and family/divorce courts are openly hostile towards men
So a man must not be afraid of women? He must accept that all women are better than men? He must be social with them? Even if all his life he's been abused by them and around women who hate him? Isn't that a huge double standard? I really don't understand this expectation. This is basically a cry for conformity and intolerance. Especially if you believe in individualism. I;ll never understand this constant demonization of people. In short is, we can treat you badly as we want to, and you (general not specific) have to man up and shut up and not protest in any way shape or form and you can't leave because we really enjoy hurting you any way we can.
I meant men in general, not you personally. We've discussed this topic before... and I walked away thinking that you actually believe men are being physically threatened by women. You believe 'radical feminists' are beating and torturing men all the time. Am I close?
"""I;ll never understand this constant demonization of people. In short is, we "".... (men)........... "" can treat you badly as we want to, and you (general not specific) have to man up and shut up and not protest in any way shape or form and you can't leave because we really enjoy hurting you any way we can."""" Ever realize how many thousands of years women were told exactly that.
lol. You are the simple minded one who brought up religion. Presumably , that's what you were referring to when you made the analogy.
