Yes I do, put that's a poor justification, especially in the modern age where you have ll kinds of people running around yelling about tolerance. Two wrongs do not make a right. And the biggest problem with this is that it creates a never ending circular argument. People have limited vision, they see only what they want to, and see only things what are done to them not what they do to others. And eventually this will just cause another backlash against women down the road. it's already happening as there are men who are already shunning American women for this sort of thing. And of course, people who don't deserve it will get hurt. Abuse should never be all right just because somebody did it you. Abuse should never be justified in a tit for tat. Abuse, from either man or woman, is wrong, period, and should be stamped out before things get any worse. And I things always have to get worse before they get better. The only way to stop the cycle is to stop the abuse, but people are too emotionally invested in themselves and their victimhood to see that.
Uh,it's a LOT more than two wrongs....it's almost the entire history of the world.....and if you think poor little men have it so bad then do what women did, stand up and fight back and quit whining, men will NEVER EVER have it as bad as women had it ...NEVER.
Never say never. In tyrannies men who disagree with the party line are put in prison, tortured, or executed, by other men.
People are confusing suffragists with modern day feminists. Suffragists worked to get women the vote and equality under the law in terms of employment, education, etc. Many modern day feminists are deluded ding bats that completely ignore all the data in biological sciences when they claim that women can do anything men can do and just as well. That is just complete and utter nonsense when it comes to many physical activities.
... Okay, dude, how many people are using your screenname? Or do you have Alzheimer's disease? Why are you re-responding to older comments you've already responded to?
Never knew there was a rule against replying to a post more than once - - - Updated - - - Never knew there was a rule against replying to a post more than once.
Slave mentality, that's all. The women all laughed - merely a collective form of defence mechanism and denial.
It only appears 'outdated' because it falls foul of the political correctness laws. But, the penis is still the number one player in this game.
Agreed, and one could also ask why many fems feel the need to use an artificial penis during their lovemaking. (this especially applies to lesbians)
Garbage - because women can get sex whenever they want, yet men have to often go without. That's not equality for a start, so it's the women that should stop the whining here. - - - Updated - - - So you're complaining about nature now are you - sounds like utopian fem socialism to me, lol
How can a penis whine anyways? Nope, it's the fems and lesbos who can't stand the thought of lacking an external organ, which makes them blame men for nature's creation
Dude, I'm not the f-ing forum police. There's no rules you have to answer to me about. It's just a little weird. I responded once, you responded to my comment, then I responded again and we've been going back and forth, then you decide to respond to my first comment... as if it was the first time seeing it.
Someone takes things a little too literally. Guess I can't be surprised, but... wow, mother of holy crap, dude. You and others here are also not getting what feminism is about, and your comments about "penis envy" is exhibit A. Feminism is teaching women to be proud of their bodies. You've been mistaking the comments for complaining, when in fact it's object of their deserved pride, nothing to complain about (except pain... but what human is not going to complain about pain? Answer me that). This is why the penis envy thing is outdated. They're not envious of our bodies, they're just proud of their own. You want to know why lesbians use fake penises in their sexual activity? Maybe ask them, the answer you'll no doubt get is: because women know how to work a fake penis in a way that men can't work their real ones.
Here's what she said: In other words, something men can be grateful for. But women's bodies were built to withstand things men's bodies aren't equipped for. Feminism isn't about complaining about not having a penis, it's about being proud of the capabilities of the female body (feminism is more than just about that, of course, but on this issue, it acts contrary to your theory that it's about penis envy).
The denial would be yours. The penis is a part of the anatomy, it is not God. Sorry to break it to you. Laughter is good medicine in the face of IDIOCY. And god knows we love to laugh at IDIOCY.
Dude, the penis is a part of the anatomy. Wake up. Attributing the penis as a number one player to what? Wanking? That's what it sounds like reading your post.
