The difference between feminism and misandry is only noteworthy to people who believe feminism does and should stand for gender equality. Otherwise you are one of two people: a.) A misandrist who thinks the only true feminist is one who believes men are obsolete and women are superior. or b.) A sexist who thinks feminism is wrong, because women should know their place, and are not equal to men, but mask it behind your fear (whether real or faked) that feminism IS misandry, and it (like all other conservative fears of the "liberal agenda") is out to getcha.
That sounds kind of like the "Stereotypes have some truth to them" defense that racists and sexists use. Just sayin.
Imaginary in my post referred to "matriarchy" , not courts or feminism (and thank goodness both of them are real!). So a "real" man would be a man who takes responsibility for his short comings rather than blame them on the imaginary matriarchy ? You seem to disagree that men have any shortcomings...all their problems are because of something else (how convenient and weak)....that's not taking responsibility
Really, how many women were there do you know? Of those how many were "cheering" on those that were assaulting the men? Of that total what percentage of the total number of feminists are they? come back when you have the actual figures.
Men generally take responsibility for their shortcomings, and they're also made to take responsibility for the shortcomings of others who aren't men thanks to feminism.
Women generally take responsibility for their shortcomings, and they no longer have to take responsibility for the shortcomings of men thanks to feminism.
There were 1 billion feminists. 1 billion feminists were either taking part in the sexual and physical assault of the men peacefully and passively protecting their church or they were cheering on those feminists sexually and physically assaulting those men peacefully and passively protecting their church. 100% of those women either physically or sexually assaulting those men peacefully and passively protecting their church or cheering on the feminists physically and sexually assaulting those men identify as feminists Source: George Washington (yeah that George Washington, Americas first president)
This, of course, is pure fantasy. Your objective in confusing accurate perception with fear is obvious, but in my case you fail miserably.
Foxhastings didn't you once write: "I apologize for it and I guess we will never agree on this issue mainly because I honestly don't care if one little thing is unfair to men.... I can't even pretend to care since I know so much of history and how this world has treated women." So you're saying you don't believe in, "fairness," and you identify as a feminist. So wouldn't that mean either feminism doesn't stand for equality or like migadaulcardon has claimed you're not actually a feminist but a misandrist????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
"Hey, women against feminism: Feminism still has your back so youre welcome Lucky for you, the cultural and policy achievements of the movement don't only apply to members in the club" http://www.salon.com/2014/07/24/hey...eminism_still_has_your_back_so_youre_welcome/
This what I posted: " I honestly don't care if one little thing is unfair to men.... I can't even pretend to care since I know so much of history and how this world has treated women." No, I never posted I don't believe in fairness, you are stretching and grasping or unable to comprehend English. No, I never posted that I represent what feminism is or isn't, you are stretching and grasping or unable to comprehend English. No, I never said I hated men, you are stretching and grasping or unable to comprehend English.
Is that why feminists take responsibility for women generally getting paid less than men because women are more likely to chose easier majors at University that result in them being qualified for less lucrative careers than men who are more likely to choose more difficult majors at University that result in them being qualified for more lucrative careers rather than say..... blaiming their choices and the consequences of their choices on say... the, "patriarchy". http://www.payscale.com/career-news/...aximize-income
And if it happened while he was alive it's so relevant.... A billion ? Got stats? maybe call Ben Franklin or Paul Revere....
Yes, according to George Washington (yes that George Washington, the first president of the United States, and revolutionary war hero) there were exactly 1 billion feminists at that uh riot, er i mean rally, not 1 billion and 1 not one less than 1 billion, but exactly 1 billion feminists.
You never replied to post #64 why is that eh????? This one: Is that why feminists take responsibility for women generally getting paid less than men because women are more likely to chose easier majors at University that result in them being qualified for less lucrative careers than men who are more likely to choose more difficult majors at University that result in them being qualified for more lucrative careers rather than say..... blaiming their choices and the consequences of their choices on say... the, "patriarchy". http://www.payscale.com/career-news/...aximize-income
Ah, so you don't believe in gender equality. May I ask why? Of course, everyone wants that their beliefs, their "perceptions" are the accurate ones. You'll have to provide more proof that these perceptions are accurate. Until then, I perceive the failure is yours.
He probably just hasn't stopped laughing about George Washington and the 1 Billion Feminists yet..... Your posts do have a lot to do with fallacy though.... - - - Updated - - - He has the video!!! George can be seen on the far left.....
A woman who knows how to live and love, how to give and take, without turning every little thing into a hate fest.
so you don't know .. fair enough, that only means what I said in the first place is correct .. your original response was nothing more than a hasty generalization; a fallacy and therefore incorrect.
