Senate Intel Dems Admit There May Be ZERO Evidence Of Collusion Between Russians And Trump Campaign

WRONG!

It is the classifier's call as to whether something is classified. The Classifier in this case was the Secretary of State. As noted in your source "The decision to mark a document is more art than science and leads to bureaucratic in-fighting on whether something should be classified or not," said Gary Bass, Bauman Foundation executive director and former director of OMB Watch, a government accountability organization." The classification of an item three years after its creation is not and indicator that it should have been classified earlier. THAT is the decision of the Classifier.

 

AG Sessions open to using outside counsel to probe Obama DOJ

Hopefully, the Democrats have cheesed off Sessions enough to follow through with the above, it's a target rich environment.

 

Here you go...

http://www.secnav.navy.mil/dusnp/Security/Information/Documents/Quick Reference Guide for Marking Classified Information.pdf

"STANDARD MARKING ELEMENTS apply to all documents, including those processed in an electronic environment such as email, and are as follows:
• BANNER LINE (Examples provided in Figure 1): o Specify the highest level of classification (Confidential, Secret, Top Secret) contained in any portion of the document. o Classification level must be spelled out...."

Just placing a (C) at the beginning of a sentence does not mean the section is classified ESPECIALLY if the document is not properly marked. and more ESPECIALLY if the system is not classified.

It can also mean Copyright (C)

 

She broke laws, the DOJ refused to do anything about it. You know that little discussion on the tarmac.

Two more Clinton classified emails discovered in FBI documents

The State Department this week deemed two more of former Secretary Hillary Clinton’s emails to contain classified information, releasing redacted versions Friday, just days before Election Day.

The messages appear to contain U.S. government policy memos toward Afghanistan and the United Arab Emirates, preparing
Mrs. Clinton for phone calls with leaders of those two nations. Information gleaned from foreign governments, as well as U.S. information about other governments, is supposed to be considered classified from the start....

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/nov/4/two-more-clinton-classified-emails-discovered-fbi/

She was schooled that this type of information was classified although you don't have to be a fool to not know that.

 

Only on the stuff she originated.

 

And on stuff she received...

No proper classified markings and not on a classified system. Without the proper markings there's no reason to suspect a document is classified especially when it is on an unclassified system.

I'm not saying she could not have recognized that a leakage had occurred but given the fact that classification was not her expertise, she'd had no training on classification, and the fact that this was an unclassified system, she had no reason to suspect that the emails she was receiving contained classified information.

 

There's no need for proof!

Let's dog Trump until he resigns.

 

LOL....I come from America. How about you? Aren't you Canadian?

In this country we usually don't stand by while a legally and constitutionally elected president is made the subject of endless
unsupported slanders and charges in order to nullify his election and cripple his nascent presidency.

James Clapper lied through his teeth to Congress regarding NSA spying.
James Comey blatantly lied in order to give political cover to Hillary Clinton.
These are the people you are holding up as virtuous incorruptible authorities? I don't think so.

How do you propose a "fair" investigation given there is no solid evidence of any sort that would actually trigger an investigation?
And why do you maintain two ethically challenged dwellers in the murky swamps of our intelligence community, both tied and beholden to the Obama administration, are to be trusted and taken at their words (which has never been all that good before)?
http://www.investors.com/politics/e...fbi-director-comey-lied-and-the-scandal-died/
http://www.redstate.com/streiff/2017/03/05/james-clapper.-lied-congress-believe-today/

Don't pretend you can lecture others on patriotism. Left wing shills don't get to
cover themselves in the flag.

 

Yup. Trump terrifies the dying Left.

The liberal myth of a progressive utopia brought about by surrender of the individual to state control – is at risk of being swept away by a great movement to free consciousness from the controlling ideas of the liberal past. We stand “at the end of something,” that something being the radical mindset that has dominated so much of American intellectual life since the 1960s.

“The jig is up.” Liberalism no longer possesses the moral authority to control our national politics.

Liberals are terrified of Trump because they know that their great myth, once the light of consciousness has been shined on it, will dissolve as quickly as a grain of salt in water. The “president rolls his eyes when he is called a racist, and we all – liberal and conservative alike – know that he isn’t one.” Elizabeth Warren’s Jeff Sessions rant was just that: a hysterical rant, and everyone knows it. “White guilt,” and all that goes with it, is now just tiresome noise. There is no reality to liberals’ mental myth of the enlightened state.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2017/03/the_end_of_the_worldfor_liberals.html

 

No it is not we get LOTS of information that is classified AT BIRTH no one needs to lift a finger.

 

She like everyone who receives clearance are SCHOOLED in what is classified information and are SCHOOLED that is may not be marked with anything but it is STILL CLASSIFIED INFORMATION and their responsibility to treat it accordingly. Comey testified it was clearly classified information and her responsibility to treat it accordingly.

 

Delete

 

With all the oil and gas that Russia exports, now coal is an issue.

The UN condemn all the invasions.

 

It can also mean copyright.... are you serious?

the (c) was at the beginning of the paragraph. The fact that someone was apparently copying, either by hand or some other way, emails or documents from classified systems into an unclassified one doesn't declassify. If you strip the headers from a classified document, it's still classified. I can't believe for one moment that someone who is experienced working with classified material would see that and not realize that was meant as a classification, even with headers stripped off.

 

Yes, copyright.
As pointed out...

"STANDARD MARKING ELEMENTS apply to all documents, including those processed in an electronic environment such as email, and are as follows:
• BANNER LINE (Examples provided in Figure 1): o Specify the highest level of classification (Confidential, Secret, Top Secret) contained in any portion of the document. o Classification level must be spelled out...."

Without the banner and the proper classification on an unclassified system the symbol (c) is more likely to refer to a copyright than it is to a classification.

 

Just to be clear, you are arguing that if you scan a classified document with all of the classified headings, remove the headings, then the document is no longer classified? You're quoting the requirements for sending classified email. Hillary is a case study on sending it incorrectly, and on an unauthorized system.

I find it really amazing that you guys will go to any lengths to defend grandma felony. It's just stunning to me.

 

Law's a bitch ain't it?

If you scan a classified document on an unclassified scanner you've committed a violation.
If you then remove the headings you've committed a violation.
If you know to do that and don't then also remove the paragraph markings you're ...

If someone goes to that effort and then emails the document on an unclassified system how is the receiver of the email to know that (C) is a marking for "Classified" and not the expected, given the environment, symbol for "Copyright?"

And if you're going to keep beating that dead dog I will most certainly be happy to make you look the fool for doing it.

 

And you're defending this...why?

Your claiming that a (c) at the beginning of a paragraph on a government document would look like "copyright" to you? And you are going to make me look like a fool?

 

N

No, I'm not making you look like a fool. I'm just helping you do it.

What you are claiming is that an improperly marked document on an unclassified system should be recognized as classified even though it contains no classified markings.

Yeah, fool is the right word.

 

I believe insulting someone on the forum is against the rules of this place. But I'm perfectly content to have you think you would read that and think, "Hmm, this paragraph has a copyright! Imagine that!"

 

The claim was Clinton or her supporters started the birther movement. I corrected the claim.

 

No, not at all, this is the © copyright symbol. It's in a circle not parenthesis.

 

You are, as is usually the case, wrong.

 

lol

very rarely, am I wrong.

 

(C) is not the symbol for copyright. © is.