11-Year-Old Boy Dressed In Drag Dances At Gay Bar, Gets Dollar Bills Thrown At Him

You can point to thousands of examples of right wing individuals (and leaders) that have been charged and convicted of child / infant molestation, rape or outright murder and it’s immediately ignored or screamed it’s a one off — not representative of the larger group.

But two gay men have been accused of sleeping with individuals that are over the age of consent in several US states and it has to be repeated on every thread that these idiots can attack gays.

I for one and glad they are so ridiculous, non-factual, or just simply making intellectually dishonest claims as society has largely swung away from this excrement. It really couldn’t have happened without their hard work...



It’s even more stark polling people by age group or party affiliation, all that’s pretty much left are evangelicals (a declining population group), the silent generation (a rapidly declining population group) and the undereducated (increasing unfortunately).

Thanks bigots!

 

I just said that and its the point. You question my percentage of the population that supports my argument with no evidence of your own to back your argument. Then once again I proved my estimates right on the money and you still can't admit it. Typical.

With no evidence and no reference to the study. I've posted multiple. Try again to be even more vague to hide your lack of facts for your argument.

Still waiting for you to quote which study and your evidence backing you up. Don't worry its clear you can't do it.

And what a shock pure opinion no evidence. And one of my first studies was crime stats of victims not a survey. Please read more carefully next time.

Once again pure opinion no evidence.

And for the trifecta. Pure opinion no evidence

I have no idea and neither do you. Its another worthless opinion with no factual backing.

Come back when you actually have evidence to go along with your unsupported theories. Until then its all meaningless and unsupported.

I can promise you the children could care less who their assaulter allegedly had sex with before them or some false proclamation of what they claim to be. All they know is their attacker.

I must say it is quite amusing watching you flail about from one unsupported theory to another pretending its my job to provide the evidence you can't to support yourself.

 

Still can't point to any post where that occured. Same old story. All talk no facts.

 

Trump's parents are dead.

 

...

 

Really, the parents should be beaten to death.

Because all skinny kids are anorexic.

 

Oh.

My.

 

In this case, correct.

 

^ Forum-breaking thread win.

 

Not anorexic.

No two daddies.

But other than that, another post matching the quality of others from you.

 

You don't get to wiggle out of responsibility and accountability for your disingenuous allegations via semantic squirming.

Your own words are DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE that you are dishonestly CONFLATING gays and pedophiles throughout this entire thread.

 

That you persist in spouting this DISHONEST CANARD without any shred of credible scientific evidence to support it says volumes.

 

So you don't actually dispute the evidence that shows that homosexuals are more likely to be pedophiles, you just limit it to homosexuals who are ONLY attracted to children?

So what you meant to say was, men attracted to other men are not more likely to be attracted to children?

 

Pedophiles are more likely to molest boys (ie homosexual pedophile) even though most homosexual pedophiles identify and live as heterosexual teleiophiles.

Homosexual teleiophiles are no more likely than heterosexual teleiophiles to molest children. Some studies actually put them has having lower offense rates than heterosexual.

Some base this on ease of access or other factors. I really don’t care, pedophiles damage children for life. Those children are more likely to have emotional issues, depression, suicide — and are more likely to molest other children. It’s a vicious cycle of pain. No matter their orientation or the gender of the child they need to be delt with immediately and permanently.

So no, homosexuals are not more likely to be pedophiles, pedophiles are however more likely to be homosexual (toward children) — which is why I disagree with the concept of banning openly gay men from teaching or children’s events because it isn’t based on statistics, it’s based on bigotry only.

Correct. Studies listed here that prove that narrative.

I don’t think heterosexuals, bisexuals, or homosexuals are more at risk as someone that is attracted to gender, are attracted to specific elements of that gender... not children.

 

To confirm, are you saying that he didn't have any internal suffering?

 

What if they are Homosexual teleiophile pedophiles?

 

@notme seems to think that he can.

 

It's ****ing hilarious watching you flail around on after having your bullshit debunked for the 100th time. You have been given NUMEROUS peer reviewed scientific papers and journals, by various posters, myself included, which have demolished your argument. Your moronic and psychotic obsession with Harvey Milk causes you to make baseless and slanderous claims against him, which have been thoroughly proven false, using the very citations you keep providing in support of your case, lol.

 

There is no way to be a teleiophile pedohile as they are inverse definitions. The papers I have read label the gender attraction first followed by the chronophilia second. So the closest we could arise at is homosexual teleiophile homosexual pedohile — meaning a man that is attracted to men and prepubescent boys. Absolutely they exist, but as research has indicated homosexual teleiophiles; that is your typical gay male, is not more likely to molest children — Per Capita — than a heterosexual teleiophile.

 

I think they do exist but to no higher percentage within their self-reported sexual orientation percentage. Most present as heterosexual. Think Jerry Sandusky. Pedophiles in general don't openly broadcast their sexual orientation and for obvious reasons. cd8ed has published the confirming studies in this and numerous other threads, numerous times. I'd rather not go through the motion of doing that all over again.

 

I'm not interested in disproving any conspiracy theory that you can come up with. That's up to you to prove.

 

It's up to you to prove your conspiracy theories.

In the meantime....
Seeing how a dad brings his son to the nudybar is rated PG

 

It's like watching an outraged Energizer Bunny...

 

Are you saying you're not interested in disproving any conspiracy theory that he can come up with, and that it's up to him to prove? (Just trying to save our friend's question mark key...)

 

Its up to you to prove that he was not suffering.

What is the relevance of this?